Ace,

As usual, you open your mouth without the benefit of a brain backing
you up.

What we have here is a very concerned parent trying to do what's best
for his/her child.

Please don't feel compelled--just because Otis hasn't yet--to add your
two cents to every single post.  You have no idea what you're talking
about.

Very young children have significant accommodative amplitudes.  This
will diminish as the child ages.  Placing reliance on an infantile
accommodative system to overcome refractive error is a recipe for
accommodative and convergence disaster down the road for this child.
It seems to me that these parents are considering all logical options
here.

STFU.

For someone who likes to get all warm and fuzzy with post-LASIKs with
complications and sound like someone concerned with the visual problems
of others, you are awfully rude and uncaring to this concerned parent
who's trying to figure out what's best for the child. What do you know
about the child's condition other than what you've read here or
elsewhere on the internet? What are your qualifications to make such
disparaging remarks to a parent? I think this one deserves a huge
apology.