> > if it is not dense, can we avoid surgery or is surgery the only answer.
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> -MT, OD
> The doctor said that it is developmental cataract which he developed
> within the last 6 months. I have been looking at his new born pictures
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> thanks
> Arun
There's no technical/surgical reason that you couldn't wait until
adulthood for surgery, in fact it would be easier for the surgeon in
many ways... HOWEVER your son would always have a lazy eye with quite
blurred vision, even after successful cataract surgery as an adult. This
is because the brain has not learnt to process vision from that eye and
so it has learned to partly ignore that eye (in laymans terms). (More
correctly: amblyopia). Cataract surgery needs to be done as a young
child to give the brain a chance to learn to process vision from the
(ex-)cataract eye.
This is all assuming the cataract is bad enough to affect vision, which
most are, and which the doctor will know by just looking at the
cataract. If the cataract was very mild then there could be an argument
for leaving it there.
Dom
> i remember reading some posts here where a user has said that his
> parent/himself and his son have congenital cataract and they left it
> alone till they were adults before performing surgery. is that true for
> congenital cataract, can those with congenital cataract wait till
> adulthood to perform surgery
_Some_ congenital cataracts, like anterior polar cats, have amazingly little
effect on visual acuity, and the retina is not blurred when we look inside
the eye.
More commonly, though, congenital cataract in one eye devastates the vision
and will surely cause deep amblyopia if not removed.
When the kid can't see out of the eye (and we can't see in) then surgery is
appropriate, and sooner is better. Age 6 is somewhat tardy and age 9 is too
late.
-MT
concerned parent - 03 Mar 2006 20:45 GMT
to the group
if a lens is removed due to a cataract what is expected for vision. cuold a
person with cataract surgery wear contact if needed. what are the problems
that could arrive. one doctor told me that glaucoma could be an issue. the
other doctor said it could happen but is not likely.
>> i remember reading some posts here where a user has said that his
>> parent/himself and his son have congenital cataract and they left it
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>-MT
Dom - 04 Mar 2006 12:04 GMT
> to the group
> if a lens is removed due to a cataract what is expected for vision. cuold a
> person with cataract surgery wear contact if needed.
yes even a 16 month old can wear a contact lens.
what are the problems
> that could arrive. one doctor told me that glaucoma could be an issue. the
> other doctor said it could happen but is not likely.
even if your son did get glaucoma it's treatable, unlike amblyopia.
without knowing the details of how bad the cataract is, amblyopia is
probably guaranteed with no surgery, while glaucoma is only a risk with
surgery, and then a treatable risk at that.
dom
David Robins, MD - 05 Mar 2006 02:20 GMT
On 3/3/06 5:59 AM, in article
iZXNf.6634$5M6.1859@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net, "Mike Tyner"
<mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote:
>> i remember reading some posts here where a user has said that his
>> parent/himself and his son have congenital cataract and they left it
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> -MT
Actually, for a true congenital cataract (at birth, fairly opaque), even 3
months is usually too later and leads to nystagmus and intractable
amblyopia. These are removed as urgent surgery at 1-3 weeks of age. Silicone
contacts are then usually placed immediately.
Juvenile cataracts, acquired later on, are removed when vision reaches the
point that the surgical risk is worth it. Generally around 20/60 - 20/70 or
so. The age is not usually an issue. The above ages mentioned are regarding
treatment of amblyopia, which depends also on how much the cataract-caused
vision had declined.