Dr. G was right when he said the center of her eye/lens is highly
myopic. If one doctor says operate and the other says leave it, then
the decision is yours. An operation is indeed a risky thing, that
everyone can agree. If her vision is functional and she has no trouble
getting about, then no hurry to operate. Lots of people arent
correctable to 20/20, I for one am not and I dont remember ever being.
I do see 20/30. My dad and brother correct to 20/25. If you have
questions, ask away
Neil Brooks - 02 Mar 2006 01:47 GMT
> If you have
> questions, ask away
That comes as a great comfort to the rest of us.
Quick - 02 Mar 2006 01:55 GMT
> If one doctor says operate and the other says
> leave it, then the decision is yours.
What?!?!
Yes, they could both be right, one might be
very wrong, it might be preference, it might matter,
it might not. Don't you think it might be a good
idea to understand?
If it were me I would go back to both doctors,
tell them what the other doctor suggested and
ask them to explain it so that you can understand
and make an informed decision.
I suppose if you live on the internet, perpetually
under the influence of halucinogenics you might
only be able to flip a coin but I would want to make
an informed decision.
-Quick
concerned parent - 02 Mar 2006 03:16 GMT
the one doctor feels that to many problems could occur with the lens removal.
even though the surgery has a high success rate. the other doctor feels that
since the lens is seeing two different ways and is also causing a high
astigmatism he thinks surgery is a good option not to mention it would take
away most if not all of her myopia. but if something did go wrong it would
bother me for the rest of my life because of the decision i made.
>> If one doctor says operate and the other says
>> leave it, then the decision is yours.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>-Quick
Quick - 02 Mar 2006 04:39 GMT
> the one doctor feels that to many problems could occur
> with the lens removal. even though the surgery has a high
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> but if something did go wrong it would bother me for the
> rest of my life because of the decision i made.
Tough decision. If I were to make a decision like that
for my own kids I believe my approach would be first
become as well informed as possible and then would
be along the lines of "would I do that for myself" and
temper it with the child's personality. If you have balanced
the risks with the rewards and made what you feel to
be the right decision there should be no regrets.
Maybe not the same but I would liken it to letting
my kids go outside to play every day. If they were
to be harmed I would not regret the decision to
have let them go out.
-Quick
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 02 Mar 2006 06:43 GMT
Maybe ask more doctors for more opinions on what they say? I cant and
wont decide for you, only you and your doctors can. Does your daughter
get a say on this? Remember if her lenses are removed, she will need
bifocals full time.
Neil Brooks - 02 Mar 2006 16:31 GMT
> I cant and
> wont decide for you,
...primarily because I have absolutely no knowledge, no qualifications
to advise, and a documented history of hallucinogenic drug use.
Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln ... how'd you like the play??
concerned parent - 03 Mar 2006 07:53 GMT
from another post that i was reading a father talked about how pictures of
his son showed a white dot in the eye that was determined to be a cataract.
the one doctor thought that my daughter could have the start of a lamellar
cataract while the other doctor thinks it is imposssible because he does not
see it. anyways my wife have always noticed that the left eye in pictures
appears to be different than the other eye. the left always looks white where
the right eye will be normal or red in the same picture. could this mean
anything?
>> I cant and
>> wont decide for you,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln ... how'd you like the play??
concerned parent - 03 Mar 2006 20:47 GMT
if the lenses were removed what problems could she have later on. is some
problem likely to occur or could she have a normal life?
>from another post that i was reading a father talked about how pictures of
>his son showed a white dot in the eye that was determined to be a cataract.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>
>>Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln ... how'd you like the play??
Dr. Leukoma - 04 Mar 2006 04:08 GMT
Dear concerned,
One of my patients had congenital cataracts along with congental
esotropia. After her lenses were removed, she was placed into contact
lenses. I inherited her when she was a bit older, putting her into
better contact lenses. She is correctable to 20/20 today, her eyes are
healthy, and she is getting ready to graduate from college. Life is
good.
The situation at present is that your daughter sees 20/80 best estimate
with a very strong lens. The alternative is to have her crytalline
lenses removed, thereby correcting the optical defect, and perhaps
giving her the opportunity to have close to 20/20 vision, albeit with
another very strong lens.
I hope this helps.
DrG