> Fair enough. I assumed that there may be strain involved, or
> difficulty with or aversion to near work.
Of course there would be symptoms if the problem is bad enough, but
individual tolerances vary, especially with age, so we don't assume
everybody needs correction. There are idiosyncratic reactions where
"accurate" correction leads to headache or diplopia or other discomfort.
> I was thinking of it as
> uncontrolled continuous exertion by the muscles, which might not be as
> desirable as having that stress unloaded.
It an intuitive assumption that doesn't always hold. There's little
difference between "continuous exertion," which sounds bad, and "muscle
tone," which sounds healthy.
> When it was mentioned, I wondered if I could have this problem (if it
> is one), since I also seem very light sensitive, and I have a low
> tolerance for reading for long periods. I recently got some computer
> glasses with extra plus power and it makes it so much more comfortable
> to read for long periods of time. It's probably nothing, but it got me
> thinking anyway.
Age is so important. That "extra plus" might do nothing for a 5-year-old,
but at age 50 it can change your entire workday.
-MT