>>>I have a perscription for -2.50 bc: 8.3 dia: 14.0
>>>in both eyes for acuvue advance.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>You do not know my mail address though.
You're right.
>Please email me if you are an od and can write me a perscription.
I'm not.
You're asking for an optometrist to do something that is certainly
silly and unethical, and probably illegal: prescribing without ever
having seen you.
Ask Otis. I'm sure he can prescribe something for you. He's been
practicing medicine around here for quite a while without a license.
It doesn't seem to bother him one bit.
Good luck.

Signature
Live simply so that others may simply live
otisbrown@pa.net - 18 Feb 2006 21:08 GMT
Neil> Ask Otis. I'm sure he can prescribe something for you.
Otis> False!
Neil> He's been
practicing medicine around here for quite a while
Otis> False! I suggest that the person study the second-opinion,
and look for a "preventive" OD to help them in the use of the
plus FOR PREVENTION. It is a matter for the individual
to juxtapose these two cotradictory methods and decide
WHICH method best meets his requirements.
i.e., clear vision (from 20/70 to 20/40 or better), or
wear a full-strength minus and develop stair-case myopia.
Neil> without a license.
Otis> Suggesting that a person review or evaluate the
second-opinion does not constitute "practicing medicine".
Sorry -- your understanding is screwed up.
Neil> It doesn't seem to bother him one bit.
Otis> Slandering anyone who suggests that you
investigate "alternatives" does not seem to
"bother" Neil.
Best,
Otis
A Lieberman - 18 Feb 2006 22:24 GMT
> Neil> without a license.
>
> Otis> Suggesting that a person review or evaluate the
> second-opinion does not constitute "practicing medicine".
> Sorry -- your understanding is screwed up.
WRONG OTIS.
See
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.vision/browse_thread/thread/69e05aa2239ff
aa1/37ed5382ebf142e6?lnk=st&q=otis+brown+medical+advice&rnum=3&hl=en#37ed5382ebf
142e6
You gave medical advice in the above link.
> Otis> Slandering anyone who suggests that you
> investigate "alternatives" does not seem to
> "bother" Neil.
WRONG OTIS
Neil is telling the truth. No slander can be found when somebody tells the
truth. See above link.
Allen