> > whats up everybody, i'm new here, and i've been wearing contacts for 6
> > years, and just got my 1st pair of glasses, finaly.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Dom
I do have a nice size head, so most glasses looked too small on me, and
I wanted the rimless kind, but my rx is too strong. their not that
thick, but i was suprized when i saw them, i knew they wouldnt be the
thinnest, but i was surprised. I'm not gonna wear them all the time,
but i dont wanna have the lens look that thick, becasue i will wear
them sometimes in public. I asked if their was anything else thinner
than micro thin (poly), she said it was the thinnest avaialable, no
mention of high index. so....i dont know.
ms99 - 11 Feb 2006 19:13 GMT
do you think it is worth to upgrade to hi index, will i notice a big
difference????
Dom - 12 Feb 2006 08:38 GMT
> do you think it is worth to upgrade to hi index, will i notice a big
> difference????
hard to say if it's worthwhile, but possibly not as the difference may
not be that great. cutting the lenses down into a smaller frame may make
a bigger (& cheaper) difference.
Dom
Mark A - 11 Feb 2006 22:04 GMT
> I do have a nice size head, so most glasses looked too small on me, and
> I wanted the rimless kind, but my rx is too strong. their not that
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> than micro thin (poly), she said it was the thinnest avaialable, no
> mention of high index. so....i dont know.
Here are some representative indexes of commonly used materials:
1.50 Regular Plastic (AKA CR-39 or hard resin)
1.54 Mid-index such as Sola Spectralite
1.59 Polycarb
1.60 Plastic
1.66 Plastic
1.70 Plastic
The higher the index, the worse the optics as determined by abbe value,
which is a measure of chromatic aberration (the higher the abbe value, the
better the optics). Usually the higher the index, the lower the abbe value,
except for polycarb which has the lowest abbe value of any commonly used
material. In short, polycarb sucks from an optical point of view, but it is
considered to be a "safety" lens because of its high impact resistance and
high tensile strength..
The best place to get discount lenses is Costco or Wal-Mart/Sams. They carry
much better quality brands than Pearl Vision. If you want good lenses, you
will have to pay a bit more.
Dom, what would you call average?
>> whats up everybody, i'm new here, and i've been wearing contacts for 6
>> years, and just got my 1st pair of glasses, finaly.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Dom
Dom - 14 Feb 2006 10:05 GMT
> Dom, what would you call average?
In my practice the most popular contact lens powers we dispense are
between -250 and -400. It seems to me that many teenage & young adult
myopes seem to stabilise around -400 and only some progress beyond that.
Strictly speaking I am referring to the mode rather than the average.
As far as a statistical average (or modal) refraction for myopes is
concerned - I don't know. But if you took 100 myopes off the street at
random I'm sure the majority of them would be less than -475.
Dom
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 14 Feb 2006 22:54 GMT
dont forget that -4 contacts are around a -5 in glasses depending on
the person. Contacts appear to behaive differently for each eye. You
could take two people with -5 glasses pescriptions, one may see fine
with -4 contacts(such as me for example) while another may need -4.25
or even -4.5 contacts!
You are right that most are less than -4.75, in fact most will be less
than -3. I know lots of myopes and id say near 2/3 of them are less
than -3, in fact a good potion of them have such low myopia they dont
regulary wear glasses. This lady was only -1 and seeing 20/40 UCVA so
she had absolutely no need for glasses unless she actually loves
wearing glasses(which she doesnt)
Ann - 18 Feb 2006 11:33 GMT
>dont forget that -4 contacts are around a -5 in glasses depending on
>the person. Contacts appear to behaive differently for each eye. You
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>she had absolutely no need for glasses unless she actually loves
>wearing glasses(which she doesnt)
I guess your sample is greater than the previous poster who tests
patients every day. Ho hum!
Ann