Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

new glasses

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ms99 - 11 Feb 2006 03:47 GMT
whats up everybody, i'm new  here, and i've been wearing contacts for 6
years, and just got my 1st pair of glasses, finaly.

my prescription for glasses is OD -4.75 C SPH OS -4.75 C -0.50 axis 178

i went to pearl vision and they recomended their polythin
lenses(polycarb), with anti glare.  i received them today, and they
look kind of thick, it is very noticable the overlap on the lenses.  I
noticed other people glasses today, and they dont seem as thick as
mine, and i have the polycard lens.  Is this right???  is -4.75 that
strong that even with the poly lenses they look kind of thick????? the
lady told me it was because i have a strong prescription.
they also feel wierd and of course, blury on the sides, way different
from my contacts.
Does this seem right??? and what else can i do to make them thinner???
are they supposed to look kinda of thick at my prescription????

here is the link to myframes..
http://www.theyedoctor.com/products/_cid_10001-pid_28733__product.aspx
thanks.
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 11 Feb 2006 07:45 GMT
smaller frame, higher index will make them thinner. If you dont like
glasses, you can go back to contacts and wear glasses around the house
Dom - 11 Feb 2006 11:48 GMT
> whats up everybody, i'm new  here, and i've been wearing contacts for 6
> years, and just got my 1st pair of glasses, finaly.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> http://www.theyedoctor.com/products/_cid_10001-pid_28733__product.aspx
> thanks.

-475 is stronger than the average person's prescription, so you'd expect
it to be thicker than most pairs of glasses you'd see on other people.

Also the bigger your frame the thicker your lenses will be. Your frame
is not very small... but I don't know how big your head is, maybe you
can't afford to go any smaller!!

If it's blurry on the sides (ie. when not looking through the centre of
the lens) that's a quality of polycarbonate.

To make them thinner you can take them back and ask if you can upgrade
to a 1.67 or 1.7 material. Or better still get them cut down into a
smaller frame.

Dom
ms99 - 11 Feb 2006 18:03 GMT
> > whats up everybody, i'm new  here, and i've been wearing contacts for 6
> > years, and just got my 1st pair of glasses, finaly.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Dom

I do have a nice size head, so most glasses looked too small on me, and
I wanted the rimless kind, but my rx is too strong.  their not that
thick, but i was suprized when i saw them, i knew they wouldnt be the
thinnest, but i was surprised.   I'm not gonna wear them all the time,
but i dont wanna have the lens look that thick, becasue i will wear
them sometimes in public.   I asked if their was anything else thinner
than micro thin (poly), she said it was the thinnest avaialable,  no
mention of high index.  so....i dont know.
ms99 - 11 Feb 2006 19:13 GMT
do you think it is worth to upgrade to hi index, will i notice a big
difference????
Dom - 12 Feb 2006 08:38 GMT
> do you think it is worth to upgrade to hi index, will i notice a big
> difference????

hard to say if it's worthwhile, but possibly not as the difference may
not be that great. cutting the lenses down into a smaller frame may make
a bigger (& cheaper) difference.

Dom
Mark A - 11 Feb 2006 22:04 GMT
> I do have a nice size head, so most glasses looked too small on me, and
> I wanted the rimless kind, but my rx is too strong.  their not that
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> than micro thin (poly), she said it was the thinnest avaialable,  no
> mention of high index.  so....i dont know.

Here are some representative indexes of commonly used materials:

1.50 Regular Plastic (AKA CR-39 or hard resin)
1.54 Mid-index such as Sola Spectralite
1.59 Polycarb
1.60 Plastic
1.66 Plastic
1.70 Plastic

The higher the index, the worse the optics as determined by abbe value,
which is a measure of chromatic aberration (the higher the abbe value, the
better the optics). Usually the higher the index, the lower the abbe value,
except for polycarb which has the lowest abbe value of any commonly used
material. In short, polycarb sucks from an optical point of view, but it is
considered to be a "safety" lens because of its high impact resistance and
high tensile strength..

The best place to get discount lenses is Costco or Wal-Mart/Sams. They carry
much better quality brands than Pearl Vision. If you want good lenses, you
will have to pay a bit more.
Helene - 13 Feb 2006 21:41 GMT
Dom, what would you call average?

>> whats up everybody, i'm new  here, and i've been wearing contacts for 6
>> years, and just got my 1st pair of glasses, finaly.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Dom
Dom - 14 Feb 2006 10:05 GMT
> Dom, what would you call average?

In my practice the most popular contact lens powers we dispense are
between -250 and -400. It seems to me that many teenage & young adult
myopes seem to stabilise around -400 and only some progress beyond that.

Strictly speaking I am referring to the mode rather than the average.

As far as a statistical average (or modal) refraction for myopes is
concerned - I don't know. But if you took 100 myopes off the street at
random I'm sure the majority of them would be less than -475.

Dom
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 14 Feb 2006 22:54 GMT
dont forget that -4 contacts are around a -5 in glasses depending on
the person. Contacts appear to behaive differently for each eye. You
could take two people with -5 glasses pescriptions, one may see fine
with -4 contacts(such as me for example) while another may need -4.25
or even -4.5 contacts!

You are right that most are less than -4.75, in fact most will be less
than -3. I know lots of myopes and id say near 2/3 of them are less
than -3, in fact a good potion of them have such low myopia they dont
regulary wear glasses. This lady was only -1 and seeing 20/40 UCVA so
she had absolutely no need for glasses unless she actually loves
wearing glasses(which she doesnt)
Ann - 18 Feb 2006 11:33 GMT
>dont forget that -4 contacts are around a -5 in glasses depending on
>the person. Contacts appear to behaive differently for each eye. You
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>she had absolutely no need for glasses unless she actually loves
>wearing glasses(which she doesnt)

I guess your sample is greater than the previous poster who tests
patients every day.  Ho hum!

Ann
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.