> I've only tried the Advance on a few patients but so far none have been
> very enthusiastic about it. I haven't heard too many good stories about it
> from others either.
Here's one. I have a lot of patients wearing AV283, and for the past year
I've sent many of them home wearing an AVA trial on one eye, AV2 on the
other, to compare and choose. With a sample of around 200 patients, roughly
40-50% prefer AVA for comfort, to the degree that AV2 has fallen behind AVA
in sales at one office.
There's a small number, maybe 5%, who find the AVA distinctly _less_
comfortable than the AV2. I don't have an explanation for that.
I haven't used Oasys as much, but it does seem to outpace the Advance, at
least a little.
-MT
Dr. Leukoma - 02 Feb 2006 14:12 GMT
> > I've only tried the Advance on a few patients but so far none have been
> > very enthusiastic about it. I haven't heard too many good stories about it
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I haven't used Oasys as much, but it does seem to outpace the Advance, at
> least a little.
I sent all of my Acuvue Advance back for the Oasys, and I don't
dispense any AV2's anymore.
DrG
> -MT
LarryDoc - 02 Feb 2006 16:48 GMT
> I sent all of my Acuvue Advance back for the Oasys, and I don't
> dispense any AV2's anymore.
>
> DrG
Likewise, on both accounts. If you a/b the AA and Oasys on the same
patient (allowing for adaption and dissipation of the slick stuff in the
storage solution), AA always looses. It'll be gone in no time. The lens
has no place in my practice, especially considering the superior
alternatives.
LB, O.D.