Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Contact lenses not well adjusted

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 01 Jan 2006 03:00 GMT
I was disappointed when I received my new disposable contact lenses
because I see blurry from the left eye. I can still read, but sometimes
with difficulty. In 6 months I will go for another eye exam, but will
visit a different doctor this time. Should I go as soon as possible
instead? I don't have headaches or any other obvious problems. Thanks.
Neil Brooks - 01 Jan 2006 03:05 GMT
>I was disappointed when I received my new disposable contact lenses
>because I see blurry from the left eye. I can still read, but sometimes
>with difficulty. In 6 months I will go for another eye exam, but will
>visit a different doctor this time. Should I go as soon as possible
>instead? I don't have headaches or any other obvious problems. Thanks.

Are you happy with blurry vision?

If not, I would go back to the prescribing doctor and discuss the
problem with him/her.

Not much downside to that....

Happy New Year!
Signature

Live simply so that others may simply live

Amanda - 01 Jan 2006 03:30 GMT
How often did you change them?

>I was disappointed when I received my new disposable contact lenses
>because I see blurry from the left eye. I can still read, but sometimes
>with difficulty. In 6 months I will go for another eye exam, but will
>visit a different doctor this time. Should I go as soon as possible
>instead? I don't have headaches or any other obvious problems. Thanks.

Signature

http://www.bzpharmacy.com/cialis.php

mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 01 Jan 2006 05:08 GMT
New pair every 30 days.

> How often did you change them?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Message posted via MedKB.com
> http://www.medkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/vision/200601/1
mikesmith9999@hotmail.com - 01 Jan 2006 05:35 GMT
I don't mind seeing blurry when I drive. The most annoying thing is
when I need to read something in a dark place like in the car or at the
restaurant, or at work where I look at a computer screen all day.

Denis

> I was disappointed when I received my new disposable contact lenses
> because I see blurry from the left eye. I can still read, but sometimes
> with difficulty. In 6 months I will go for another eye exam, but will
> visit a different doctor this time. Should I go as soon as possible
> instead? I don't have headaches or any other obvious problems. Thanks.
The Real Bev - 01 Jan 2006 06:24 GMT
> I don't mind seeing blurry when I drive. The most annoying thing is
> when I need to read something in a dark place like in the car or at the
> restaurant, or at work where I look at a computer screen all day.

Go back to the doc.  Now.

I have a similar problem.  The doc finally arrived at a good prescription,
but the contacts that I ordered are all different.  I conclude that the
manufacturing tolerances are far sloppier than my eyes demand, but I have
no actual confirmation of that.

Out of 4 pair of lenses, 1 is good, 2 are bad in different ways, and the
third is unknown.  I went back to the doc last week, who is ordering me
something different.

My previous lenses were Cooper Preference Torics (6 or 8 out of 12 lenses
bad).  These are Sunsoft Multiples Torics (4 out of 6 bad, so far).

Nothing is ever easy.

>> I was disappointed when I received my new disposable contact lenses
>> because I see blurry from the left eye. I can still read, but sometimes
>> with difficulty. In 6 months I will go for another eye exam, but will
>> visit a different doctor this time. Should I go as soon as possible
>> instead? I don't have headaches or any other obvious problems. Thanks.

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
***********************************************
"A complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
 that the conspiracy is working."   -- Tanuki

Only Have Eyes For You - 01 Jan 2006 06:29 GMT
>"A complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
> that the conspiracy is working."   -- Tanuki

Got that, Uncle Otie??
Neil Brooks - 01 Jan 2006 06:31 GMT
>>"A complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
>> that the conspiracy is working."   -- Tanuki
>
>Got that, Uncle Otie??

Hey ... that's supposed to be my line ;-)
Signature

Live simply so that others may simply live

The Real Bev - 01 Jan 2006 06:36 GMT
>>>"A complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
>>> that the conspiracy is working."   -- Tanuki
>>
>>Got that, Uncle Otie??
>
> Hey ... that's supposed to be my line ;-)

So we both stole from the same guy?

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
***********************************************
"A complete lack of evidence is the surest sign
 that the conspiracy is working."   -- Tanuki

TG - 02 Jan 2006 22:48 GMT
> I have a similar problem.  The doc finally arrived at a good prescription,
> but the contacts that I ordered are all different.  I conclude that the
> manufacturing tolerances are far sloppier than my eyes demand, but I have
> no actual confirmation of that.

ANSI Z80.20 and ISO 8321 standards lay down tolerances for contact lens
power.  For 0.00D to 10.00D, the tolerance is +/- 0.25D, and above 10.00 the
tolerance is 0.50D.

In manufacture, lenses that fall outside of these tolerances wil probably be
reassigned.

In the US certainly, incorrect labelling of lens power is a recall situation
Quick - 02 Jan 2006 23:22 GMT
>> I have a similar problem.  The doc finally arrived at a
>> good prescription, but the contacts that I ordered are
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> tolerance is +/- 0.25D, and above 10.00 the tolerance is
> 0.50D.

ick... We've been working on fitting my trifocals for months
now and we're making .25 adjustments. Doc was even
considering a .125 this last time if they could do it... Maybe
that's why some of the adjustments have bought some
surprising results.  By the standards we could order a
-.25 difference and end up with a -.75 actual.

I would hope with computer controlled manufacture that,
in practice, tolerances are much tighter than the standards.

-Quick
The Real Bev - 03 Jan 2006 00:34 GMT
>> I have a similar problem.  The doc finally arrived at a good
>> prescription, but the contacts that I ordered are all different.  I
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> In the US certainly, incorrect labelling of lens power is a recall
> situation

My suspicion centers on the angle of the astigmatism correction (-2.25x80 and
90).  I could bring the right lens of the first bad pair into the proper
position by pulling on the skin around my eyelids in various ways.  It always
bounced back within seconds, though.  The right lens of the second bad pair
couldn't be repositioned correctly by anything I tried to do in the morning
before I took it out.

Sunsoft Multiples Toric
8.5 R:  +3.50 -2.25 x 90 (6/27/05)
    L:  +5.75 -2.25 x 80 (6/20/05)

I had a similar problem with Cooper Frequency 55 Torics.

Signature

Cheers, Bev
===================================================================
Teamwork:  A bunch of people running around doing what I tell them.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.