Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

100, 120 and other super high plus diopter lenses? WOW!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 30 Dec 2005 15:41 GMT
http://www.msiprecision.com/catalog/images/OI-100M.jpg
http://www.msiprecision.com/catalog/images/OI-120M.jpg
http://lpoproducts.com/Products/images/LPO189.jpg

I never knew it was possible to make such high plus diopter lenses! I
researched into this when my ophthamologist used a +90 diopter lense to
look in my eyes. That thing was nearly spherical not unlike a marble!
If one were to look into a lens with a dioptric value higher than the
axial length of your eye, would light focus *outside* your eyeball? I
know an emmetropic eyeball is +60 diopters and placing a plus lens
makes light focus in front of the retina but as long as the lens is
less than +60 light would come to a focus still inside your eye. How do
the optics of a lens higher than +60 work if light now comes to a focus
*outside* your eye? Would there be a difference between a +66, +78,
+90, +100 or even +120? Would light of a super high plus come in focus
at a point still inside the lens? Or right after it finishes traveling
thru the lens? Would you be able to see clearly from 1cm away from your
eyeball itself or 1cm away from the surface of the plus lens when its
held to your eye? How high can plus lenses get really?
William Stacy - 30 Dec 2005 16:01 GMT
> If one were to look into a lens with a dioptric value higher than the
> axial length of your eye, would light focus *outside* your eyeball?

Yes. The real, inverted image forms between the lens and the observer.
This very common technique is called indirect ophthalmoscopy.

 Would there be a difference between a +66, +78,
> +90, +100 or even +120?

Yes.  Image size and field of view.  +20 D. lenses are only used with an
opthalmoscope, 78 and 90 are only used with a slit lamp.
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 30 Dec 2005 16:09 GMT
Thanks! So if one were to look thru say a +120d lense, would he be
seeing everything upside down?

Also whats the difference between dioptric value and magnification
times? Take a magnifying glass lens thats marked as 10x for example or
a microscope eyepiece marked as 10x, 15x, 20x or so? What dioptric
value would such lenses have?
William Stacy - 30 Dec 2005 16:36 GMT
> Thanks! So if one were to look thru say a +120d lense, would he be
> seeing everything upside down?

Yes, and it doesn't need to be that strong.  You get the same effect if
you hold any plus lens farther away from your eyes than it's focal length.

> Also whats the difference between dioptric value and magnification
> times? Take a magnifying glass lens thats marked as 10x for example or
> a microscope eyepiece marked as 10x, 15x, 20x or so? What dioptric
> value would such lenses have?

approximately 4 D. per x mag. applies to single lens systems, with
microscopes or other multiple lens systems you have to multiply the
components. (gross simplification/approximation)
William Stacy - 30 Dec 2005 16:44 GMT
 You get the same effect if
> you hold any plus lens farther away from your eyes than it's focal length.

(providing the object viewed is also beyond the lenses' focal length)
Salmon Egg - 30 Dec 2005 19:24 GMT
On 12/30/05 7:41 AM, in article
1135957294.960703.261070@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "acemanvx@yahoo.com"

> http://www.msiprecision.com/catalog/images/OI-100M.jpg
> http://www.msiprecision.com/catalog/images/OI-120M.jpg
> http://lpoproducts.com/Products/images/LPO189.jpg

What is the purpose of such lenses? Certainly, a 100D or even a 200D lens is
not all that difficult to get if the numerical aperture (or f/no.) is not a
problem. It is done for microscope lenses all the time.

Bill

-- Ferme le Bush
William Stacy - 30 Dec 2005 19:35 GMT
> What is the purpose of such lenses? Certainly, a 100D or even a 200D lens is
> not all that difficult to get if the numerical aperture (or f/no.) is not a
> problem. It is done for microscope lenses all the time.

In eye exams, +90 D lenses are used (although 78 is more common) in
conjunction with a slit lamp biomicroscope to get a nice, although
inverted, binocular view of the retina. Useful especially for fine 3-D
viewing of the macula.

I can't think of any use for 100 D or more single lenses.

w.stacy, o.d.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.