Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What does 20/20, 20/15, 20/10 or even better vision look like?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 22 Dec 2005 09:49 GMT
I cant stop thinking what perfect or supervision looks like! Can any of
you blessed with exceptional vision describe what your world looks to
you? I can imagine but I want an accurate idea :)
p.clarkii@gmail.com - 22 Dec 2005 12:06 GMT
its late, just go to bed.  you post too much anyway.
do you really think someone could explain this to you?
Scott Seidman - 22 Dec 2005 13:43 GMT
acemanvx@yahoo.com wrote in news:1135244981.157253.227770
@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> I cant stop thinking what perfect or supervision looks like! Can any of
> you blessed with exceptional vision describe what your world looks to
> you? I can imagine but I want an accurate idea :)

It's great.  You can clearly see the fnords.

Signature

Scott
Reverse name to reply

CatmanX - 22 Dec 2005 21:01 GMT
Well, I do have 6/3 acuity. It is fantastic. I can see flies on a dunny
door 300m away, number plates on cars 1km down the road, each hair on a
horses mane across a padock, the numbers on the back of a football
player at the other side of the paddock, the small writing on the back
of a watch from 10 feet. 6/3 acuity is brilliant.

The good part is that I can sit back and laugh at a loser like you.

Gee life is great.

dr grant
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 23 Dec 2005 05:16 GMT
If Dr. Grant isnt exaggerating, thats just amazing. Sorry but it looks
like you are. Only an eagle can see license plates from a kilometer.
Yea make fun of my vision, go ahead and laugh. Easy to do that if your
an optometrist.

clear vision isnt a good description. I get "clear" vision too with
glasses. I am talking about beyond the 20/30 I see with glasses. Whats
the differences? Id love for someone with good vision(even good
corrected vision) to describe to us!
CatmanX - 23 Dec 2005 11:14 GMT
Suffer in your crusty jocks space Ace, my dad has 6/3 acuity, my kids
alll have 6/3 acuity.

Just face the facts, god hates you because you play with your penis too
much.

Now zip your pants up and go to bed.

good boy.

dr grant
otisbrown@pa.net - 23 Dec 2005 16:19 GMT
Dear Aceman,

Subject: Respect for your intellectual search for scientific
(not medial) truth.

DrGrant> Just face the facts, god hates you because you play with your
penis too
much

Does Dr. Grant respect you and your intelligence on the
subject of the eye's dynamic behavior?

I suggest we need to learn to respect the facts behind
the natural eye's proven behavior -- and offer you
at least a CHOICE in the matter when you are
at -1/2 diopter.

You are not going to get an "informed choice"
from Grant -- are you?

It this man helping you understand "alternatives" -- or
"defending the minus-lens practice".

And who suffers the consequences?

Best,

Otis
Neil Brooks - 23 Dec 2005 17:04 GMT
>Dear Aceman,
>
>Subject: Respect for your intellectual search for scientific
>(not medial) truth.

Otis, you've got a live one.  

Would you and this aceman character kindly conduct the rest of this
conversation via e-mail, not in a public forum.  In the alternative,
you could always offer him a session on your XBox360 and a ride in
your Cadillac, like usual.
Signature

Live simply so that others may simply live

CatmanX - 23 Dec 2005 18:55 GMT
LOL Neil.

Some boiled lollies might add to the attraction.

dr grant
CatmanX - 23 Dec 2005 18:59 GMT
Otis, the thing about informed choice is the INFORMED bit. You have a
drum to beat, which is wrong and scientifically invalidated years ago.

Space ace is ill informed as he ignores 90% of what is said and holds
on to the 10% that is usually wrong. He may sound a little right, but
under it all, he has no idea.

The eye is but a part of a complex system. Silly ideas such as Bates
and all his followers are simply wrong. The science is wrong, the
hypothesis is wrong and all that derives from it is wrong.

dr grant
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 24 Dec 2005 07:50 GMT
There is some controversities reguarding the Bates idea and yes some of
his claims are a bit far fetched, but modern Bates supports are
relistic and believe in myopia prevention and clearing of pseudomyopia
and also how NOT to make your eyes worse. I have a hard time believing
6/3 vision. My sister's friend's optometrist said she was 20/10 but she
couldnt read a single 20/10 letter on my snellen chart. Shes a solid
20/15 however and a bit better than that but no way 20/10.
A Lieberman - 23 Dec 2005 00:23 GMT
> I cant stop thinking what perfect or supervision looks like!

maybe I am missing something, but clear vision would be the answer that
comes to my mind....

Allen
Mike Tyner - 23 Dec 2005 01:27 GMT
>> I cant stop thinking what perfect or supervision looks like!
>
> maybe I am missing something, but clear vision would be the answer that
> comes to my mind....

People express surprise seeing individual bricks in buildings, leaves on the
trees, and blades of grass instead of green blobs.

-MT
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.