Dear Aceman,
Subject: Respect for your intellectual search for scientific
(not medial) truth.
DrGrant> Just face the facts, god hates you because you play with your
penis too
much
Does Dr. Grant respect you and your intelligence on the
subject of the eye's dynamic behavior?
I suggest we need to learn to respect the facts behind
the natural eye's proven behavior -- and offer you
at least a CHOICE in the matter when you are
at -1/2 diopter.
You are not going to get an "informed choice"
from Grant -- are you?
It this man helping you understand "alternatives" -- or
"defending the minus-lens practice".
And who suffers the consequences?
Best,
Otis
Neil Brooks - 23 Dec 2005 17:04 GMT
>Dear Aceman,
>
>Subject: Respect for your intellectual search for scientific
>(not medial) truth.
Otis, you've got a live one.
Would you and this aceman character kindly conduct the rest of this
conversation via e-mail, not in a public forum. In the alternative,
you could always offer him a session on your XBox360 and a ride in
your Cadillac, like usual.

Signature
Live simply so that others may simply live
CatmanX - 23 Dec 2005 18:55 GMT
LOL Neil.
Some boiled lollies might add to the attraction.
dr grant
CatmanX - 23 Dec 2005 18:59 GMT
Otis, the thing about informed choice is the INFORMED bit. You have a
drum to beat, which is wrong and scientifically invalidated years ago.
Space ace is ill informed as he ignores 90% of what is said and holds
on to the 10% that is usually wrong. He may sound a little right, but
under it all, he has no idea.
The eye is but a part of a complex system. Silly ideas such as Bates
and all his followers are simply wrong. The science is wrong, the
hypothesis is wrong and all that derives from it is wrong.
dr grant
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 24 Dec 2005 07:50 GMT
There is some controversities reguarding the Bates idea and yes some of
his claims are a bit far fetched, but modern Bates supports are
relistic and believe in myopia prevention and clearing of pseudomyopia
and also how NOT to make your eyes worse. I have a hard time believing
6/3 vision. My sister's friend's optometrist said she was 20/10 but she
couldnt read a single 20/10 letter on my snellen chart. Shes a solid
20/15 however and a bit better than that but no way 20/10.