Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Can't tolerate rigid lenses

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
crvc - 17 Dec 2005 18:49 GMT
I've had RGP lenses for 4 years but have never been able to wear them
more than half a day.   I've been to four different optomentrists and
have five different pairs.  None are better or worse than the others
for wearablility.   The doctor says it's a poor tear break up time.
Restasis did not help.  Meibomian gland therapy did not help.  I asked
about testosterone eyedrops and the doctor shrugged.  Is anyone using
androgen eyedrops and seeing improvent?
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 17 Dec 2005 19:01 GMT
Can you tolerate soft contacts better, especially the new silcone
hydrogels? I cant tolerate soft contacts and many people say I wont
have luck with the rigid ones either. One lady insists I have no say in
if I can or cant until I try them. Its $2000 to find out and even if I
can tolerate them ill still need reading glasses and eyedrops several
times a day!
The Real Bev - 18 Dec 2005 02:42 GMT
> Can you tolerate soft contacts better, especially the new silcone
> hydrogels? I cant tolerate soft contacts and many people say I wont
> have luck with the rigid ones either. One lady insists I have no say in
> if I can or cant until I try them. Its $2000 to find out and even if I
> can tolerate them ill still need reading glasses and eyedrops several
> times a day!

$2K seems a little high for RGPs.  A lot high, in fact.  I paid $450 for
multifocal RGPs including fitting a few years ago -- they didn't work out
after 8 tries so I got a year's worth of single-vision softies, most of which
fit -- and I thought I paid too much for that.

Signature

Cheers, Bev
===============================================================
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely and in a
well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
and shouting HOLY sh.t!!! WHAT A RIDE!!!

acemanvx@yahoo.com - 18 Dec 2005 05:26 GMT
well its $150 for the eye exam, $600 to get the blueprints for zwave
RGPs and $300 each pair of contacts. Thats over $1000 if they fit and
work the first try then its $300 each remake. I have decided not to
bother because I will still need reading glasses and eyedrops. I
however am looking into ortho-k which is less hassle than RGP and ill
ask to be undercorrected so I only need distance glasses 10% of the
time. No eyedrops needed
Jan - 19 Dec 2005 16:08 GMT
> however am looking into ortho-k which is less hassle than RGP

LOL.

What do you think Ortho-K lenses are (made off)?

Signature

Jan (normally Dutch spoken)

Dan Abel - 19 Dec 2005 21:32 GMT
> > however am looking into ortho-k which is less hassle than RGP
>
> LOL.
>
> What do you think Ortho-K lenses are (made off)?

I was going to post something about this, but realized that I really
don't know anything about Ortho-K.

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

Dan Abel - 19 Dec 2005 21:30 GMT
> well its $150 for the eye exam, $600 to get the blueprints for zwave
> RGPs and $300 each pair of contacts. Thats over $1000 if they fit and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ask to be undercorrected so I only need distance glasses 10% of the
> time. No eyedrops needed

It's always nice to read the advice of an expert.

:-(

You ask for advice, and then either you don't read it or you totally
ignore it, I don't know which.

Signature

Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA

crvc - 18 Dec 2005 17:26 GMT
Soft lenses won't solve my problem.  I had LASIK which led to poor
night vision.  The RGPs are the only thing I've found that improves the
halos.   I have several pairs of RGPs from three different
optometrists, one a specialist in fittng post-LASIK eyes.  His lenses
fit the best but none are tolerable for more than a few hours at a
time.

Maybe I'm being too picky?  I use drops hourly when wearing the lenses.
 Is that standard with RGP wear?    I've tried everything in the
pharmacy.  Aquify works best for me.
The Real Bev - 19 Dec 2005 00:31 GMT
> Soft lenses won't solve my problem.  I had LASIK which led to poor
> night vision.  The RGPs are the only thing I've found that improves the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>   Is that standard with RGP wear?    I've tried everything in the
> pharmacy.  Aquify works best for me.

I tried 8 pair of RGPs before giving up.  Some/many gave me excellent vision
for the 1 second out of 60 they stayed in place, but none was comfortable and
most hurt/itched all the time and hurt intolerably after 4 or 5 hours.  Drops
made no difference, although I guess the anaesthetic drops they give for
glaucoma tests might have worked.

Some people are just unlucky.

Signature

Cheers,
Bev
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While you can't fool all the people all the time, you can fool
enough of them most of the time to make the rest impotent.

CatmanX - 17 Dec 2005 19:44 GMT
Tear break up is not a big deal with RGP lenses as there is minimal
tear loss increase over your normal eye.

The initial things I would be thinking of are lens design, diameter,
material and edge lift.

dr grant
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.