> Can you tolerate soft contacts better, especially the new silcone
> hydrogels? I cant tolerate soft contacts and many people say I wont
> have luck with the rigid ones either. One lady insists I have no say in
> if I can or cant until I try them. Its $2000 to find out and even if I
> can tolerate them ill still need reading glasses and eyedrops several
> times a day!
$2K seems a little high for RGPs. A lot high, in fact. I paid $450 for
multifocal RGPs including fitting a few years ago -- they didn't work out
after 8 tries so I got a year's worth of single-vision softies, most of which
fit -- and I thought I paid too much for that.

Signature
Cheers, Bev
===============================================================
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely and in a
well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, totally worn out,
and shouting HOLY sh.t!!! WHAT A RIDE!!!
acemanvx@yahoo.com - 18 Dec 2005 05:26 GMT
well its $150 for the eye exam, $600 to get the blueprints for zwave
RGPs and $300 each pair of contacts. Thats over $1000 if they fit and
work the first try then its $300 each remake. I have decided not to
bother because I will still need reading glasses and eyedrops. I
however am looking into ortho-k which is less hassle than RGP and ill
ask to be undercorrected so I only need distance glasses 10% of the
time. No eyedrops needed
Jan - 19 Dec 2005 16:08 GMT
> however am looking into ortho-k which is less hassle than RGP
LOL.
What do you think Ortho-K lenses are (made off)?

Signature
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
Dan Abel - 19 Dec 2005 21:32 GMT
> > however am looking into ortho-k which is less hassle than RGP
>
> LOL.
>
> What do you think Ortho-K lenses are (made off)?
I was going to post something about this, but realized that I really
don't know anything about Ortho-K.

Signature
Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA
Dan Abel - 19 Dec 2005 21:30 GMT
> well its $150 for the eye exam, $600 to get the blueprints for zwave
> RGPs and $300 each pair of contacts. Thats over $1000 if they fit and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> ask to be undercorrected so I only need distance glasses 10% of the
> time. No eyedrops needed
It's always nice to read the advice of an expert.
:-(
You ask for advice, and then either you don't read it or you totally
ignore it, I don't know which.

Signature
Dan Abel
dabel@sonic.net
Petaluma, California, USA
Soft lenses won't solve my problem. I had LASIK which led to poor
night vision. The RGPs are the only thing I've found that improves the
halos. I have several pairs of RGPs from three different
optometrists, one a specialist in fittng post-LASIK eyes. His lenses
fit the best but none are tolerable for more than a few hours at a
time.
Maybe I'm being too picky? I use drops hourly when wearing the lenses.
Is that standard with RGP wear? I've tried everything in the
pharmacy. Aquify works best for me.
The Real Bev - 19 Dec 2005 00:31 GMT
> Soft lenses won't solve my problem. I had LASIK which led to poor
> night vision. The RGPs are the only thing I've found that improves the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Is that standard with RGP wear? I've tried everything in the
> pharmacy. Aquify works best for me.
I tried 8 pair of RGPs before giving up. Some/many gave me excellent vision
for the 1 second out of 60 they stayed in place, but none was comfortable and
most hurt/itched all the time and hurt intolerably after 4 or 5 hours. Drops
made no difference, although I guess the anaesthetic drops they give for
glaucoma tests might have worked.
Some people are just unlucky.

Signature
Cheers,
Bev
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While you can't fool all the people all the time, you can fool
enough of them most of the time to make the rest impotent.