>Anyone have an opinion on this Claroxan stuff?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>vision. I'd just try it since it doesn't seem dangerous or anything,
>but it's pretty darned expensive.
Well ....
The one "test" they cite on their website is fatally flawed
(longitudinal, lacking any meaningful controls), and even *they* admit
to the confounding variables.
I just wouldn't have any unreasonable expectations for miraculous
improvement.
My (non-medical) $0.02

Signature
Live simply so that others may simply live