Acuvue advance for astigmatism compared to B&L soflens 66

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

greg.kandra@sbcglobal.net - 01 Dec 2005 18:56 GMT

Any feedback from folks out there on which is better or more preferred?
I'm on the fence as to which I'm going to go with and want to ping the
audience for additional experiences out there. Thanks.

Reply to this Message

Wooly - 01 Dec 2005 20:19 GMT

I wasn't happy with either one, but I'm blessed with two moderately
steep Rxs and a fair bit of astigmatism.

I'm also picky about *my personal* comfort level, so even when the doc
said "Oh, those fit well!" they didn't FEEL as if they fit well.

>Any feedback from folks out there on which is better or more preferred?
> I'm on the fence as to which I'm going to go with and want to ping the
>audience for additional experiences out there. Thanks.

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET.
This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%.
Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...

Reply to this Message

CatmanX - 01 Dec 2005 21:12 GMT

Personally, I hate the B&L lens as the material dries out all the time.
Purevision is a much better material.

Instead of asking for advice over the net, get your OD to trial some
lenses and see which is most comfortable for you. Besides there are
many other good toric lenses on the market besides these two.

dr grant

Reply to this Message