> He/she (or his tech) scans a particular area. Usually the optic disc (to
> measure cupping or the retina nerve fiber layer) or the macula. Depends on
> what he/she is looking for.
>> He/she (or his tech) scans a particular area. Usually the optic disc (to
>> measure cupping or the retina nerve fiber layer) or the macula. Depends
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the cup-to-disc ratio by noting how big is the optic disk and
> the cupping. So what do you mean measuring cupping in particular?
The doctor does measure by estimating the ratio, but using the OCT actually
gives a 3 D image with 6 different views. With the OCT you can actually see
the cupping from the back of the eye (optic nerve) towards the retina. The
retina nerve fiber layer scans around the optic disc and measures the
thickness of the nerve layers to check for thinning.
> Is there any chance (even 0.01%) or no matter how tiny as it may seem
> that the laser can damage the rods and cones.
I haven't read up that much on risks, but I believe it is more like
ultrasound. I will check the manual and get back to you.
> Also it is possible to scan the entire retinal surface from the
> macula to optic disk to peripheral portions in one sitting. How
> long would this take?
We have only scanned the optic disk and macula. This can be done in one
setting. It is a very quick procedure (less than 5 minutes per eye), unless
the patient has trouble with fixation. The periphery isn't scanned, at
least not as far as I know (but I'll look into it too).
> Tnx.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> >
>> > Kyle
Dr. Leukoma - 31 Oct 2005 14:49 GMT
> I haven't read up that much on risks, but I believe it is more like
> ultrasound. I will check the manual and get back to you.
The OCT is not an ultrasonic device, but utilizes a beam of light in
the 700-800 nm range. While I have not had it performed on me, I have
observed that patients have not displayed any signs of discomfort. The
peak senstivity of the rods is in the 500-600 nm region.
DrG
gudrun17 - 31 Oct 2005 19:18 GMT
There must
> >> He/she (or his tech) scans a particular area. Usually the optic disc (to
> >> measure cupping or the retina nerve fiber layer) or the macula. Depends
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> retina nerve fiber layer scans around the optic disc and measures the
> thickness of the nerve layers to check for thinning.
> > Is there any chance (even 0.01%) or no matter how tiny as it may seem
> > that the laser can damage the rods and cones.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> the patient has trouble with fixation. The periphery isn't scanned, at
> least not as far as I know (but I'll look into it too).
My doctor said OCT measured 16 different sectors of the retinal nerve
fiber layer. Is that what you mean by different views? My HRT's have
measured cup to disk ratio but I didn't know OCT would do this. All my
doctor mentioned was thickness of the nerve fiber layer in each sector,
but presumably that's all he was looking for. When my husband had OCT
it was to examine subretinal fluid.
-Gudrun
EyeTech - 02 Nov 2005 03:41 GMT
> There must
>
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> it was to examine subretinal fluid.
> -Gudrun
The retinal nerve fiber layer and the macula scans both scan 6 different
angles. It is not the same as the sectors your doctor refers to. (Maybe
sectors are layers of the retina??) By scanning in different angles we can
then choose to scan just one particular angle at a higher resolution to get
a better view of something, like subretinal fluid.
The optic nerve scan makes one 360 degree scan around the nerve.
Kyle - 01 Nov 2005 01:00 GMT
> >> He/she (or his tech) scans a particular area. Usually the optic disc (to
> >> measure cupping or the retina nerve fiber layer) or the macula. Depends
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> retina nerve fiber layer scans around the optic disc and measures the
> thickness of the nerve layers to check for thinning.
Is it possible to have thin retina nerve layer yet the nerve fiber
going to the optic disk is normal?? For example. A person has an
average cup to ratio of 0.3. Is it possible the nerve layer beneath
the retina is thin yet the nerve fiber going into the optic disk
is normal?
kyle
> > Is there any chance (even 0.01%) or no matter how tiny as it may seem
> > that the laser can damage the rods and cones.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> >> >
> >> > Kyle
EyeTech - 02 Nov 2005 03:32 GMT
Kyle:
Your question about risks, the manual was pretty vague, I read a portion of
it today (meant to bring it home, but forgot it), but to summarize you would
have to scan the exact same portion of the retina for a long period every
day to cause any risk. No percentages were given. The OCT is not
ultrasound, it is like ultrasound in that it measures the light reflections,
whereas the ultrasound measures sound reflections.
It is only used for the portions previously discussed (not the periphery).
I don't know if there are any "off label" uses.
When we measure the RNFL (retina nerve fiber layer) it measures 360 degrees
around the optic nerve. We are usually checking for thinning of the RNFL
caused by glaucoma. We also do the ON (optic nerve) scan to check the
cupping at that time. I'm not sure what you're asking in your last posted
question regarding a thin retina nerve fiber layer with a normal nerve fiber
going into the optic disk. That would be a question for your doctor to
answer. If you or a family member has a question about test results - the
best thing to do is ask. We have patients who even bring a list of
questions in with them so they don't forget to ask them all. It's your
right to be informed.
If indicated we scan the macula. Usually done in patients who have macular
degeneration, macular edema, macular hole, macular pucker, premacular
fibrosis, the list goes on. It is very sensitive and can detect early
holes, fluid (edema), holes, etc..
>> >> He/she (or his tech) scans a particular area. Usually the optic disc
>> >> (to
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>> >> >
>> >> > Kyle
Don W - 06 Nov 2005 16:36 GMT
. If you or a family member has a question about test results - the
> best thing to do is ask. We have patients who even bring a list of
> questions in with them so they don't forget to ask them all. It's your
> right to be informed.
Just wondering... how is that right defined? Sometimes it's very difficult
to even buttonhole the doc.
Don W..
EyeTech - 07 Nov 2005 04:31 GMT
Maybe I should have said "your right and your responsibility to stay
informed about your health." Doctors do have a huge demand on their time,
but for the most part if you ask questions they answer them. Some patients
want the information in the simplest terms possible, others want more
complex. Either way, it's hard for the doctor to read the patient's level
of understanding in a short time while being pushed for time and making a
diagnosis (and sometimes determining a treatment plan). So slow things down
and ask questions. It's your time. When he walks in the room and the door
closes behind him, he's on your time. I hate to say this, but if your
doctor isn't willing or able to take time to explain things to you or answer
your questions, maybe you need a different provider. The doctor I work for
is guilty of running behind schedule (who isn't), but for the most part, by
the time he's done with the patients they don't mind, they feel they were
treated right and not rushed through just because he was behind.
>. If you or a family member has a question about test results - the
>> best thing to do is ask. We have patients who even bring a list of
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Don W..