> I spend a good part of my day in front of dual 21" monitors
> at a distance of about 32" and the 1 mm center segment
> only covers maybe1/3 of the monitor vertically. So... I was
> thinking it would be nice to have "upside down" progressives
> for the PC with the top 3/4 intermediate leaving only the
> bottom 1/4 for reading.
Another solution would be smaller monitors closer. Then you
could sleaze by with cheap bifocals. Of course, no one will be
impressed by cheap bifocals or small monitors.
To me, a practical solution for indoors would be add 1.0D for
the room and 2 or 2.25 for the closer work. One could
consider the half-and-half lenses. I think they are called "Franklin"
(after Ben) or "Library". But, heck, you cannot mail-order that
kind. They are, however, unique, and somewhat fashionable.
Poets and scholars use them.
Gloriously, IOL implants have left me seeing quite sharply at ~ 1M, and
with apparently only about a half diopter of unresolved astigmatism. So
I am doing just fine with little Walgreen half-pane +1.25D reading
glasses. But basically my biggest problem is being able to read
the schedule while watching the TV. Here, the smaller-and-closer
solution is also applied to TV sets.
In a couple of weeks, the time will be right for refraction and the
fitting of eyeglasses. So I need to make my decisions carefully as
SS will only pay for one pair of eyeglasses, and, case of bifocals,
with visible edges between the panes.
> I suppose I could be dead before we got everything tweaked properly...
When you are dead, you can see everything clearly again.
--
Dicky
(Saving up for the trip)