Try reading some research for a change. Please explain why the National
Eye Institute is currently conducting a long term trial involving the
use of antioxidants. As for caloric restriction, the research on that
is overwhelming.
p.clar...@gmail.com wrote:
> Try reading some research for a change. Please explain why the National
> Eye Institute is currently conducting a long term trial involving the
> use of antioxidants.
Because they show evidence of slowing or preventing some diseases. They also
show detrimental side effects, when used indiscriminately.
> As for caloric restriction, the research on that
> is overwhelming.
Specific benefits for the eye aren't well known. Could you point us to some
findings relative to vision?
-MT
John H. - 26 Sep 2005 05:48 GMT
Mike,
1. Do this medline search: "caloric restriction" and retina. You will
come up with 8 hits, surprising results. No, not going to post them as
most will not read them. It confirms my earlier statement though,
caloric restriction does appear beneficial for the eyes. When I put up
the first post I didn't check it out but was extrapolating from the
known effects of CR so presumed there would be some benefit. Guess
what, there is. Common sense really, the retina is the brain and the
benefits of CR for the brain are very surprising indeed. PS. more than
cortisol, also increased protein turnover and increased expression of
heat shock proteins, both of which offer protection for neurons.
So thanks for the question, it is good to know that I am beginning to
understand some of this. Nonetheless it is too early to say
definitively if CR will help everyone's vision. As I stated in my first
post, it protects vision, I doubt it will improve it.
The last abstract points, showed bad results of CR for albino rats(with
qualifications by authors), all the others point to positive effect.
2.
Indiscriminate use of anything is potentially dangerous. NSAIDS are an
excellent example where recommended use can lead to a whole variety of
problems(kidneys, liver, and heart). However, your observation is
interesting and highlights the importance of balance. Can you direct me
to any references?
3.
As for fasting, I think this is a dangerous practice. It is not caloric
restriction.
4.
Now who is the quack? (directed to nitwit who labelled me so.)
Regards,
John.
> > Try reading some research for a change. Please explain why the National
> > Eye Institute is currently conducting a long term trial involving the
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> -MT