Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / August 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

High index material technology?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
salmonegg@sbcglobal.net - 13 Aug 2005 02:41 GMT
Optical glasses were once classified as light (crown) and dense (flint)
glass. The denser (mass per volume) glasses had higher indexes than the
light glasses. Except for some special formulations, expensive rare earth
glasses for example, it was difficult to get lighter lenses of the same
optical power by increasing the index. Is that still true? Are such glasses
used for eyeglasses?

Does the same relationship between density and index hold for plastic? Where
can I get such data on plastic? What is the mechanism that allows higher
index without a corresponding increase in density? In glass, it usually
depends upon the density of electrons that are excited by light.

Bill
BC - 16 Aug 2005 15:15 GMT
> Optical glasses were once classified as light (crown) and dense (flint)
> glass. The denser (mass per volume) glasses had higher indexes than the
> light glasses. Except for some special formulations, expensive rare earth
> glasses for example, it was difficult to get lighter lenses of the same
> optical power by increasing the index. Is that still true? Are such glasses
> used for eyeglasses?

Virtually all of the dense flint glasses based on lead have been
replaced with much lighter titanium-based glasses having identical
refractive index and Abbe number.  The main motivation for doing this
was to avoid lead poisoning, but the lower density is certainly a good
thing for most applications.

Brian
salmonegg@sbcglobal.net - 16 Aug 2005 20:05 GMT
On 8/16/05 7:15 AM, in article
1124201714.417514.139040@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "BC"
<brianc1959@aol.com> wrote:

> Virtually all of the dense flint glasses based on lead have been
> replaced with much lighter titanium-based glasses having identical
> refractive index and Abbe number.  The main motivation for doing this
> was to avoid lead poisoning, but the lower density is certainly a good
> thing for most applications.

That is interesting. Is there any evidence that such glass was a problem for
the user of optical goods? Was the problem with producers and fabricators of
glass?

Bill
Johannes Swartling - 17 Aug 2005 08:36 GMT
> On 8/16/05 7:15 AM, in article
> 1124201714.417514.139040@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "BC"
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> of
> glass?

Check out Optics & Photonics News, August 2004:

http://www.osa-opn.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPN-15-8-36

Johannes
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.