> Optical glasses were once classified as light (crown) and dense (flint)
> glass. The denser (mass per volume) glasses had higher indexes than the
> light glasses. Except for some special formulations, expensive rare earth
> glasses for example, it was difficult to get lighter lenses of the same
> optical power by increasing the index. Is that still true? Are such glasses
> used for eyeglasses?
Virtually all of the dense flint glasses based on lead have been
replaced with much lighter titanium-based glasses having identical
refractive index and Abbe number. The main motivation for doing this
was to avoid lead poisoning, but the lower density is certainly a good
thing for most applications.
Brian
salmonegg@sbcglobal.net - 16 Aug 2005 20:05 GMT
On 8/16/05 7:15 AM, in article
1124201714.417514.139040@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "BC"
<brianc1959@aol.com> wrote:
> Virtually all of the dense flint glasses based on lead have been
> replaced with much lighter titanium-based glasses having identical
> refractive index and Abbe number. The main motivation for doing this
> was to avoid lead poisoning, but the lower density is certainly a good
> thing for most applications.
That is interesting. Is there any evidence that such glass was a problem for
the user of optical goods? Was the problem with producers and fabricators of
glass?
Bill
Johannes Swartling - 17 Aug 2005 08:36 GMT
> On 8/16/05 7:15 AM, in article
> 1124201714.417514.139040@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, "BC"
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> of
> glass?
Check out Optics & Photonics News, August 2004:
http://www.osa-opn.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPN-15-8-36
Johannes