>>I just got a new prescription that's -2.25 and -2.75. My doctor says this
>>is
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>-MT
Dear lise,
What is your concern about a
"strong prescription"?
That you will not longer be able
to get along without your -2.5 diopter
glasses?
Best,
Otis
(Engineer)
A Lieberman - 07 Aug 2005 21:12 GMT
> Dear lise,
>
> What is your concern about a
> "strong prescription"?
Dear Lise,
Please disregard Otis's postings. He is not in the medical profession and
not in any position to give medical advise.
Thank you!
Allen
> I'm pleased to hear that for a couple of reasons - he seemed surprised
> that I
> didn't already wear them all the time (I was -2.25 then) and I read that
> beyond -2 its often the case that people need to. Is that your experience
> also?
"Need" is pretty subjective - it's obvious you don't "need" them for
everything.
Mostly people wear glasses full time because it's a hassle taking them off
and on.
My advice is don't worry about the effect on your eyes. Human research shows
that myopia follows pretty much the same pattern whether you wear glasses or
not.
Wear them to drive. Otherwise use common sense. Be skeptical when anyone
tells you there are major effects either way - wearing or not wearing
glasses.
-MT, OD
lise J - 08 Aug 2005 20:28 GMT
Thanks Mike that's good to hear. I don't need them for everything like you
say just for more challenging visual activities but when people are pointing
things out and you have to admit you can't see them, it makes you wonder if
you'r going blind!
>> I'm pleased to hear that for a couple of reasons - he seemed surprised
>> that I
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>-MT, OD