Hello!
I have a astigmatism developing in my eyes, -0.50 each eye.
I also use a telescope. I prefer to observe without my glasses on if
possible but this is getting to be a problem.
I do not have any test lenses to try, so I have to ask...
In theory, would it be possible to mount a test lens (let's say to correct
for -0.50 cylinder) BETWEEN the telescope eyepiece and the objective and
have it correct the view for me?? Could this lens be placed somewhere in
the barrel of the eyepiece?
(I am sure it would work between the eyepiece and the eye).
Would the distance between the test lens and the eyepiece lenses be critical
or would a centimeter either way be usable?
If this trial lens (-0.50 cyl) would work for one eyepiece of a given focal
length, would work for several eyepices of different focal lengths?
I was thinking of trying some "quality test lenses" but thought I would ask
my question here before I looked into where and how to obtain them.
Many thanks for your thoughts on this.
Waz
George - 21 Jul 2005 14:33 GMT
> Hello!
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Waz
You might try posting to sci.optics and sci.astro.ccd-imaging as I have
found people there are more versed in astronomy related vision issues
and lenses. George
waz - 22 Jul 2005 01:56 GMT
Thanks for all the input.
I did post on a few sci-optics type groups as suggested.
The overall consensus is that it seems feasible but should be placed between
the eye and the eyepiece.
I wanted to place it between the eyepiece and objective to reduce scratches,
dust and eyelash oil buildup.
I'll try both and see if results are acceptable.
Thanks all.
>> Hello!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> found people there are more versed in astronomy related vision issues
> and lenses. George
William Stacy - 21 Jul 2005 15:42 GMT
I'm pretty sure you could do this, although it will probably degrade the
optics more than the benefit of the astigmatic correction. I assume you
want to do it because one placed on the eyepiece might be rotated if
that's how the thing is focused. Do you notice a significant improvement
with the -.50 D.? That's a pretty small amount.
w.stacy, o.d.
> Hello!
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Waz
Repeating Rifle - 21 Jul 2005 20:17 GMT
On 7/21/05 1:55 AM, in article vpJDe.7936$je2.783387@news20.bellglobal.com,
> Hello!
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Waz
What you are asking for is almost available in devices or cameras. In many
models compensation is available for spherical refractive error.
Your approach is fundamentally correct. While not optimum, the lens can be
placed outside and adjacent to the eyepiece. Of course, you will have to
rotate the cylindrical lens or the combination to give best results. You
should be able to get lenses from Edmund Scientific or cozy up to an
optometrist to get ophthalmologic lenses.
Bill