Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

IOL diplopia cause/cure?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Wayne Stidolph - 03 Jul 2005 02:33 GMT
Ahhh, my poor left eye - first it was hyperopic and I disliked contact
lenses, so I had a Staar ICL put in ... which had zero vault and the eye
got a cataract. (Same thing on the right eye, but haven't had that
treated yet) Doctor removed ICL and crytalline lense, put in normal
acrylic IOL. Saw OK, but then developed PCO, had YAG treatment. Now I
see a double-image, superimposed slightly up and to the right of the
"main" image. Very annoying at night, light objects against dark
background are significantly blurred (for instance, I can't read text on
a TV screen, or a street sign)

I can make the double image go away from the central field by looking
through a pinhole or blocking the lower edge of my field of view. In the
remaining "viewport" the image is quite sharp.

I'm wondering, what might cause this? What might be treatments for this?
I'm getting ready to go back and have the right eye ICL/cataract
removed, wondering if there's anything I can do to prevent or minimize
this problem in that eye.

Thanks in advance,
  Wayne
William Stacy - 06 Jul 2005 06:27 GMT
> Ahhh, my poor left eye - first it was hyperopic and I disliked contact
> lenses, so I had a Staar ICL put in ... which had zero vault and the eye
> got a cataract.

From what follows, I suspect you're in the presbyopic age group.  I
cannot understand why a surgeon would put a ICL in when refractive lens
exchange is the obvious and best solution.

 (Same thing on the right eye, but haven't had that
> treated yet) Doctor removed ICL and crytalline lense, put in normal
> acrylic IOL. Saw OK, but then developed PCO, had YAG treatment. Now I
> see a double-image, superimposed slightly up and to the right of the
> "main" image. Very annoying at night, light objects against dark
> background are significantly blurred (for instance, I can't read text on
> a TV screen, or a street sign)

Sorry to hear that.  Have a careful refraction done and hope for an
optical solution (glasses).

> I can make the double image go away from the central field by looking
> through a pinhole or blocking the lower edge of my field of view. In the
> remaining "viewport" the image is quite sharp.

The idea of the above refraction advice is the hope that a best VA
refraction would maximize the stong image, while minimizing the weaker,
ghost image.  During the refraction process, try to pay more attention
to the good image, and try to ignore the ghost. Time also will no doubt
help.

> I'm wondering, what might cause this? What might be treatments for this?

I call it "double refraction" meaning that there are now 2 pathways for
incoming light, probably due to irregular shaped holes in the posterior
capsule from the YAG. For treatment see above, and as a last resort, if
all else fails, consider gas perm lenses with a clear pupil inside an
opaque (artificial) iris.

> I'm getting ready to go back and have the right eye ICL/cataract
> removed, wondering if there's anything I can do to prevent or minimize
> this problem in that eye.

Go to a better surgeon, one who is comfortable doing sutureless clear
cornea incisions, and who does a lot of them (>300 per year). If you are
anywhere near the west coast or don't mind traveling for the best, go to
 http://www.changcataract.com

w.stacy, o.d.
Wayne Stidolph - 06 Jul 2005 08:29 GMT
>> Ahhh, my poor left eye - first it was hyperopic and I disliked contact
>> lenses, so I had a Staar ICL put in ... which had zero vault and the
>> eye got a cataract.
>
>  From what follows, I suspect you're in the presbyopic age group.

50 now, I was about 45 when the adventure began :)

  I
> cannot understand why a surgeon would put a ICL in when refractive lens
> exchange is the obvious and best solution.

The hope was that I would get my hyperopia adjusted-for whilst retaining
some accomodation (since I was just at the early stage of presbyopia);
sounded feasible to me, so I enrolled in the study

>  (Same thing on the right eye, but haven't had that
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Sorry to hear that.  Have a careful refraction done and hope for an
> optical solution (glasses).

That *does* seem like the safest response now!

>> I can make the double image go away from the central field by looking
>> through a pinhole or blocking the lower edge of my field of view. In
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> incoming light, probably due to irregular shaped holes in the posterior
> capsule from the YAG.

That would explain the sudden onset, then. And nothing much to be done
about that, would there be...

For treatment see above, and as a last resort, if
> all else fails, consider gas perm lenses with a clear pupil inside an
> opaque (artificial) iris.

I'll keep thatoption in mind ... but my point in *starting* this mess
was that I found contact lenses to be a tremendous hassle :(

>> I'm getting ready to go back and have the right eye ICL/cataract
>> removed, wondering if there's anything I can do to prevent or minimize
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> anywhere near the west coast or don't mind traveling for the best, go to
>  http://www.changcataract.com

I live in Santa Cruz, so Los Altos is close ... thanks for the guidance!

Wayne

> w.stacy, o.d.
William Stacy - 06 Jul 2005 14:58 GMT
> That would explain the sudden onset, then. And nothing much to be done
> about that, would there be...

Not really, IF my diagnosis is correct. There is always a chance that it
is also a bad IOL or a tilted one, so I also wouldn't rule out
completely the idea of a lens exchange later.  But first, get that other
eye done correctly and see what you end up with.

BTW I know that as part of studies he's doing Dr. Chang has implanted
some newer focusing lenses that you, being the adventurous type, might
be interested in.  I wasn't, and opted for the Tecnis prolate silicone
lenses in January. IMO they give the crispest vision possible at this
point in time, and are relatively immune from the PCO problem.

w.stacy, o.d.
kemccx@gmail.com - 06 Jul 2005 21:09 GMT
I wonder if there is a Dr. Chang equivalent in the NYC area.  Anyone
know ?
William Stacy - 06 Jul 2005 23:18 GMT
> I wonder if there is a Dr. Chang equivalent in the NYC area.  Anyone
> know ?

Probably, but none I know about.  The day of one of my surgeries a
thoracic surgeon from NYC was out here having his done.  We both stayed
at the Holiday Inn Express that has a free shuttle to the surgery center
and to Chang's office, along with a discount rate he's arranged there...

w.stacy, o.d.
Wayne Stidolph - 08 Jul 2005 19:40 GMT
>> That would explain the sudden onset, then. And nothing much to be done
>> about that, would there be...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> completely the idea of a lens exchange later.  But first, get that other
> eye done correctly and see what you end up with.

Yeah, I'll do that.

> BTW I know that as part of studies he's doing Dr. Chang has implanted
> some newer focusing lenses that you, being the adventurous type, might
> be interested in.

I *was* interested in the accomodative IOLs, but I want to train to be a
private pilot (being adventurous!) and the FAA won't let you have any
accommodative lens implant. I asked specifically about the Eyeonics lens
and they said 'no'

I wasn't, and opted for the Tecnis prolate silicone
> lenses in January. IMO they give the crispest vision possible at this
> point in time, and are relatively immune from the PCO problem.

I have read about those and the theory sounds very very good. The only
worrisome part I an across was that (if I understood what I read) they
are somewhat finicky to implant properly, and if tilted or something are
susceptible to 'coma' aberration ... so finding a really really good
surgeon is (as always) critical.

Wayne
William Stacy - 08 Jul 2005 20:08 GMT
> I have read about those and the theory sounds very very good. The only
> worrisome part I an across was that (if I understood what I read) they
> are somewhat finicky to implant properly, and if tilted or something are
> susceptible to 'coma' aberration ...

Haven't seen that; where did you see it? I read that decentration of the
Tecnis iol is significantly less problematic than with standard iols.

 so finding a really really good
> surgeon is (as always) critical.

For sure.

w.stacy, o.d.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.