Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Torics for this Prescription

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
rmorea@satx.rr.com - 29 Jun 2005 04:05 GMT
Hi!

I have googled quite a bit to see what can be found about the
appropriateness of toric contact lenses for prescriptions like mine.  I
have tentatively concluded I might not be a good match...but I figure
the best thing to do is ask...

This is my eyeglass prescription...havent decided yet whether to go for
contacts.  With this eyeglass prescription I see better than 20/20.

   Sphere  Cyl    Axis
RE  +1.25   -2.25  019
LE  +1.25   -2.75  163

So, anyone have an opinion whether contacts are worth attempting?

Thanks,

rcm
William Stacy - 29 Jun 2005 06:08 GMT
I think it's a dandy Rx for toric soft lenses.  Have someone order some
trials in and go from there. Why did you think you might not be a "good
match"?

w.stacy, o.d.

> Hi!
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> rcm
rmorea@satx.rr.com - 29 Jun 2005 13:59 GMT
Thanks!  Glad to hear I am wrong.  My reasons were that almost all the
examples I saw had negative sphere numbers, and my sphere numbers are
positive.  Also, some people were talking about ideally wanting a 4:1
ratio of sphere to cylinder, which I don't have.  But...if those things
are not important I'm glad to hear it...

rcm

> I think it's a dandy Rx for toric soft lenses.  Have someone order some
> trials in and go from there. Why did you think you might not be a "good
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> >
> > rcm
William Stacy - 29 Jun 2005 15:21 GMT
The only thing that could be a slight problem is that not all toric soft
lens makers do plus, so you're a bit limited in brands.  I'd probably
start with a B&L 66 toric, which is readily available in your Rx, and is
reasonably priced for a new wearer. Good luck.

w.stacy, o.d.

> Thanks!  Glad to hear I am wrong.  My reasons were that almost all the
> examples I saw had negative sphere numbers, and my sphere numbers are
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>>>
>>>rcm
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.