Dear Reader,
Before you consider paying attention to anything that Otis Brown
(otisbrown@pa.net) writes, I invite you to review all of his previous
posts.
Not only is there no scientific data on humans to support his fantasy,
but there IS plenty that proves him wrong.
Otis gets the basis of his warped, disproved ideas from concepts
written a century ago and one study done on CHICKENS!
Any of you folks chickens ?
Otis Brown is more than simply bizarre. He's wrong. See the weekly
(Mondays) "welcome to sci.med.vision" for information on how to
block his ramblings.
If you can find a shred of evidence or scientifically accepted proof
of the efficacy of using plus lens therapy to prevent the progression
of myopia in humans then, by all means, follow his advice, but do so
only under the care of a licensed optometrist or ophthalmologist.
"Scientifically accepted proof" results from experiments conducted
within the "scientific method" explained here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Otis's posts tend to fall into the category of anecdotal (or made up):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
Otis's posts can be reviewed at:
http://snipurl.com/e77s
http://snipurl.com/fe3d
The results of clinical trials using plus lens therapy to prevent the
progression of myopia can be found at (hint: it did not work):
http://snipurl.com/fij0
otisbrown@pa.net - 11 Jun 2005 18:59 GMT
Dear Neil,
The study of Oakly Young showed
that the "minus group" went
"down" at a rate of -1/2 diopter
per year.
The "plus" group stopped further
movement into nearsighedness.
The suggests that the plus
MUST be used for true-prevention
if that is the person's goal.
Obviously you ignore ALL
objective scientific
data YOU DON'T LIKE
which makes you
extremely biased.
Fortunately there
are other ODs, (preventive)
who offer their clients a
CHOICE on the threshold.
But of even greater importance
they recognize the risks
of wearing an over-prescribed
minus lens all the time.
For that reason they put
their OWN CHILDREN in
a plus -- at the threshold.
That it the true measure
of a second opinion.
Best,
Otis