Dear Reader,
Before you consider paying attention to anything that Otis Brown
(otisbrown@pa.net) writes, I invite you to review all of his previous
posts.
Not only is there no scientific data on humans to support his fantasy,
but there IS plenty that proves him wrong.
Otis gets the basis of his warped, disproved ideas from concepts
written a century ago and one study done on CHICKENS!
Any of you folks chickens ?
Otis Brown is more than simply bizarre. He's wrong. See the weekly
(Mondays) "welcome to sci.med.vision" for information on how to
block his ramblings.
If you can find a shred of evidence or scientifically accepted proof
of the efficacy of using plus lens therapy to prevent the progression
of myopia in humans then, by all means, follow his advice, but do so
only under the care of a licensed optometrist or ophthalmologist.
"Scientifically accepted proof" results from experiments conducted
within the "scientific method" explained here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
Otis's posts tend to fall into the category of anecdotal (or made up):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
Otis's posts can be reviewed at:
http://snipurl.com/e77s
http://snipurl.com/fe3d
Robert Martellaro - 09 Jun 2005 18:31 GMT
>Otis Brown is more than simply bizarre. He's wrong. See the weekly
>(Mondays) "welcome to sci.med.vision" for information on how to
>block his ramblings.
The need to believe in phony wonders sometimes exceeds not only logic but,
seemingly, even sanity.
--The Rev. Canon William V. Rauscher
Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
robopt@execpc.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field."
- Niels Bohr