Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

16 year old with thousand degree glasses contemplating suicide

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
youidiota@yahoo.com - 27 May 2005 01:25 GMT
As a child my windows had cloudy stickers on them similar to the color
of a plastic bag.  So the farthest distance my eyes were exposed to
were around 5 feet.  I received glasses when I was 7.  I played
computer games and all that, now I'm 16.  I've removed the cloudy
sticker from my windows.  It was only when I tried to participate in
sports teams that I realized how much trouble my glasses were to me.
My contacts say 7.5 diopters left eye 9 diopters right eye.  My glasses
are way stronger.  My mom says they are 1000 degrees.  I wore them for
a while and they were really hard to wear because when glasses are that
high of diopters they are really hard to break in to.  After reading
all the things about myopia reversal I have started to wear weaker
glasses.  Thus the glasses I wear now are very weak and I have two
pairs that are stronger.  In school I have to walk up and sit on the
floor if my seat is in the back.  I have dropped these glasses a lot
and when I look through them it is really annoying to see all these
scrapes and cuts on the lense.  I am the only 16 year old I know who
has eyes this bad.  It sucks.  The part where the suicide thoughts come
in is this.  I've been coming to think that myopia reversal is
impossible.  People say that it takes years.  I think this is unfair,
that I had no control over how my vision became.  No one told me about
they eyes.  The schools just said read read read.  I think the schools
are very evil that they tell us to study but yet they yell at us when
we cannot see the board, when they were the ones who told us to read so
much which made us get myopia.  My parents' parents come from hong
kong.  I wish I lived in China where they make the children do eye
exercises.  Too bad this government isn't like that.  I don't know what
I'm going to do.  I figure that these glasses will one day break, then
I cannot get another one.  I think it is illegal right?  Does anyone
know if it's possible to get another weak pair of glasses like the ones
I'm wearing?  Or if these break do I have to wear the really strong
ones?  I know that doctors prescribe prescriptions, and I don't think
my parents have the old prescription.  I don't know the prescription of
these glasses.  I don't even know if I should be wearing these old
glasses.  I don't see any improvement, and I've been wearing them for
like 2 months or around there.  I do not know what to do and am
contemplating suicide because if I do wear those really strong glasses
my eyes will get even worse and later on I will get macular
degeneration, retinal detachment, glaucoma, or cataracts.  I do not
want to get these diseases.  I do not want to wear the really strong
glasses or contacts.  The contacts hurt so much that I tense up my face
and I force my eyes to bulge because of the pain.  They bulge so much
that my grandma called me ugly and that my eyes bulge.  At least that's
what I think she said.  She said it in a language that I do not
understand.  I do not want any messages that say I am not ugly, or it
doesn't matter how you look.  Even if it is true, that is not why I'm
posting this message.  I want to know, which pair of glasses should I
wear.  On top of that many many many people call me ugly, my parents
hint that I am unattractive, or just say it outright.  I'm not being
paranoid, I'm not being defensive.  This is just my life.  I live in
San Francisco, and as you all can see, I have very little to live for.
The best moments in my life have been online, playing Diablo 2
Expansion.  Those were good times.  I am the only person I know who
wants to play that forever and ever.  I do not want anyone to tell me
that there is something to live for, because there is not.  I cannot
afford college, and if I could my transcript sucks, and also I wouldn't
be able to see the blackboard.  I seriously have nothing to live for,
and may be jumping off the golden gate bridge onto concrete, only
idiots go into the water.  If I were to do that I would go head first
and spread out my legs to maintain my body position.  This wouldn't be
so bad if I were a goodlooking girl, so I could just golddig men, but
this is not the way it is.  Please, I need someone to respond, my
thoughts are unstable.
NN - 27 May 2005 01:32 GMT
> As a child my windows had cloudy stickers on them similar to the color
> of a plastic bag.  So the farthest distance my eyes were exposed to
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> this is not the way it is.  Please, I need someone to respond, my
> thoughts are unstable.

play WoW and the good old times are back.
Signature

------------------------------------------------
http://hackerboard.de - Support& Community

youidiota@yahoo.com - 27 May 2005 05:15 GMT
> > As a child my windows had cloudy stickers on them similar to the color
> > of a plastic bag.  So the farthest distance my eyes were exposed to
[quoted text clipped - 63 lines]
> ------------------------------------------------
> http://hackerboard.de - Support& Community

my parents won't let me live here if all i do is play games.  I have
56k.  I'm not paying that monthly fee.
nothing - 27 May 2005 02:43 GMT
heh well..heck im bored.
i have poor eyesight, have worn glasses since kindergarten and i can
remember the first day i wore glasses to school, or at least a small
part of that day of sitting on the teachers lap her telling the class i
wear glasses now. duh dont announce it lady. one boy who i was friends
with raised his hand and told me his mother and aunt wear glasses too.
anyway, my glasses are weak but thats because i dont have money for the
eye drs, and i dont like going anyway.
but ive worn very weak glasses for my eyes for almost two years and all
i get are headaches, not improving eye sight, because as the two years
have gone by, i see worse now. so i dont know if a dependency on
glasses is a true theory, that glasses that are the right prescription
make your eyes worse. i dont believe that, i think its just like the
rest of your body that ages. but what do i know. your eyes will stop
getting worse for a period, usually around 18-20, then it gets bad
again for maybe a couple years, then you wont need a new rx, then a few
years later you will, etc.
anyway having glasses or not, really doesnt make such a big difference
in your appearance imo.
and as for going to college, you can go to a community college, no
matter how bad your highschool has been. haha trust me, because that
was me. and community colleges are very cheap, and if you get good
grades there, you get a lot of help to transfer to a four year school
if thats what you want to do.
youidiota@yahoo.com - 27 May 2005 05:24 GMT
you've worn glasses ever since kindegarten?  That's horrible.  Maybe
that means myopia is inherited?  Is the reason why your vision is
deteriorating because of close work or not enough distance vision
practice?  Or did you try all that?  What do you mean you're eyes are
getting worse?  How bad are they and how old are you?  My eyes are so
bad I can't read a book normally at all.  With these weak glasses on I
need to put my head really close to the computer.
William Stacy - 27 May 2005 06:02 GMT
So sci.med.vision has turned into a chat room for unhappy adolescent
myopes?  I think it's time for another sabatical...

w.stacy, o.d.

> you've worn glasses ever since kindegarten?  That's horrible.  Maybe
> that means myopia is inherited?  Is the reason why your vision is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> bad I can't read a book normally at all.  With these weak glasses on I
> need to put my head really close to the computer.
William Stacy - 27 May 2005 06:05 GMT
oops I see this is cross-posted to a suicide group.  sorry.

I'll be more careful next time.

w.stacy, o.d.
~ vera ~ - 27 May 2005 17:30 GMT
> So sci.med.vision has turned into a chat room for unhappy adolescent
> myopes?  I think it's time for another sabatical...
>
> w.stacy, o. d.

Why don't you simply ignore this thread if you do not like it? This young
person needs help, and you are heartless. I am glad that not all people are
like you. I hope you do not practice as a doctor and have to deal with
people.

~ vera ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ http://www.acc-growing-deeper.de ~
~ http://www.acc-growing-deeper.de/Israel.htm ~
~ http://groups-beta.google.com/group/Growing-Deeper ~
~ http://www.e-sword.net ~

>> you've worn glasses ever since kindegarten?  That's horrible.  Maybe
>> that means myopia is inherited?  Is the reason why your vision is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> bad I can't read a book normally at all.  With these weak glasses on
>> I need to put my head really close to the computer.
William Stacy - 27 May 2005 18:33 GMT
a cross post.

I answered her on the alt.suicide.holiday group.  Anyone can go there to
see my response.

w.stacy, o.d.
youidiota@yahoo.com - 28 May 2005 04:33 GMT
I am not a girl Vera.  I am glad I'm not a girl because girls who are
ugly are treated much worse than bad looking guys.  I'm just saying
from a guy's point of view, that if I were a really hot girl, my life
would be a hell of a lot better.  Not only am I an asian male who only
speaks English, I'm also an anti-feminist, because there is no one I
know that is as dumb as my bipolar mom.
~ vera ~ - 28 May 2005 13:56 GMT
> I am not a girl Vera.  I am glad I'm not a girl because girls who are
> ugly are treated much worse than bad looking guys.  I'm just saying
> from a guy's point of view, that if I were a really hot girl, my life
> would be a hell of a lot better.  Not only am I an asian male who only
> speaks English, I'm also an anti-feminist, because there is no one I
> know that is as dumb as my bipolar mom.

Sorry that I misinterpreted that. Maybe you should have added your first
name that I could see you are male. I am sorry about your mom, and I know it
is difficult to live with bi-polar people.

Oh dear, so you have just said you decided to hate half of the population?

How will you know what life is like for a hot looking girl? Be sure, they
have their problems, too.

I have found out that it does not matter much how things or people look
like, but what is under the cover is what really matters, and how we deal
with things and people.

Peace,

~ vera ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
otisbrown@pa.net - 27 May 2005 04:03 GMT
Dear Youidi,

In general 10 "degrees" of myopia
is stated as 10 diopters of myopia.

A plus lens of 1 diopter has
a focal length of 1 meter.

There is a doctor in Hong Kong
working on prevention with
the plus -- to be started
early into nearsighedness.
He web site is:

www.chinamyopia.org

You might contact him
for his advice.

Best,

Otis
Engineerr
A Lieberman - 27 May 2005 04:28 GMT
> Dear Youidi,

> You might contact him
> for his advice.

Dear Youidi,

Please ignore Otis.  

He is not in the medical profession nor is he in any position to give you
medical advice or medical referrals.

Thank you!

Allen
youidiota@yahoo.com - 27 May 2005 05:16 GMT
no a degree is one hundreth of a diopter.  Therefore a diopter is a
hundred degrees.  I saw it on a website saying that myopes 800 through
1300 degrees were cured by intacs.
Dr. Leukoma - 27 May 2005 19:27 GMT
That's good, Otis.  Real good.  This young person has 10 diopters of
myopia and you are referring them to a site on myopia prevention.  Your
myopia prevention ideas aren't worth the bytes they are printed on.
Misguiding people into false hope isn't the way to go through life,
Otis.

DrG
youidiota@yahoo.com - 28 May 2005 04:47 GMT
As cynical as Dr. Leukoma sounds, I have to agree.  I MEAN COMMON.  Do
you think it's possible to reverse 9 years of wearing glasses non-stop
all the time.  I only know one other person with really bad eyes.  And
she thinks that going to sleep with your glasses on is an acheivement.
That's why she's so bad.  Now why am I so bad?  Look even if it took 9
years to reverse the 9 years of damage, I don't know what I'm saying
anymore...  The point is, I'm not wearing these really strong glasses!
Dr. Leukoma - 28 May 2005 13:28 GMT
Why do you say I am cynical, when Otis is clearly the cynic?  He is
deliberately using your tragic plight to make another grandstand about
his so-called "prevention."  Or perhaps you agree that false hope is
better than no hope.  Read on, and you will find just how cynical and
remorseless Otis really is, and just how harmful his arguments can be.
If you can find an effective way to shrink an eyeball, we would all
love to hear it.

There are much more effective ways of reducing the need for eyeglasses
such as eye surgery or contact lenses.  There are ways of obtaining
them.  Contact lenses aren't that expensive, my friend.  I know of
young people with higher prescriptions than yours, Asians, Indians, who
lead happy and productive lives.  Change the things you can change and
let go of the rest.  You cannot change the shape of your eye, but you
can change your attitude about it.

DrG

DrG
youidiota@yahoo.com - 28 May 2005 04:48 GMT
But yeah I mean, it's like... on all these sights they talk about
reversing myopia for CHILDREN.  Well, what am I, THE 10 DIOPTER PERSON
supposed to do?  Do they have any advice?
Doug - 28 May 2005 04:54 GMT
> But yeah I mean, it's like... on all these sights they talk about
> reversing myopia for CHILDREN.  Well, what am I, THE 10 DIOPTER PERSON
> supposed to do?  Do they have any advice?

Go here, NOW!
http://www.feinermanvision.com/

Lemme know what you think of this.

It is costly but what is money for?

Doug
youidiota@yahoo.com - 28 May 2005 05:03 GMT
you jerk, intacs will just make my eyes seem more bulging.  And lasik?
With my luck in life something will probably go wrong.  Seven out of
ten get injuries.  Howard stern interviewed that lady from regus and
kelly.  She had 4 operations and the surgeon says that he will do
surgery and then everything will be fine and then he says he has to
operate again.  Part of the reason why I hate glasses is how they made
my left eye extrodinarily large and bulging.
Doug - 28 May 2005 05:22 GMT
> you jerk, intacs will just make my eyes seem more bulging.  And lasik?
> With my luck in life something will probably go wrong.  Seven out of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> operate again.  Part of the reason why I hate glasses is how they made
> my left eye extrodinarily large and bulging.

Goodbye.

Doug
phyknapp@yahoo.com - 29 May 2005 07:05 GMT
Do as Dr. G says.  You cannot think your way out of myopia.  It will
not kill you.

You need to grow up a little (16 is very young) and accept that you can
be helped by contact lens or better fitting glasses. In a few years,
you will have your own means of income and not have to rely on your
parents.   I started wearing glasses at 7 and ended up -10.  You can
and will live a full and productive life.  I was not ugly either.
Dr. Leukoma - 29 May 2005 13:27 GMT
> But yeah I mean, it's like... on all these sights they talk about
> reversing myopia for CHILDREN.  Well, what am I, THE 10 DIOPTER PERSON
> supposed to do?  Do they have any advice?

Those sites are selling snake oil.  There have always been snake oil
salesmen.

You should get to know other people who are -10 myopes.  Why not start
a NG for 10 diopter myopes?

DrG
SOL_Express - 27 May 2005 04:07 GMT
> As a child my windows had cloudy stickers on them similar to the color
> of a plastic bag.  So the farthest distance my eyes were exposed to
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> this is not the way it is.  Please, I need someone to respond, my
> thoughts are unstable.

While I'm not an inspiration for stability, I know that you can order
contact lenses online without a prescription.
http://www.coastalcontacts.com/ is one site. Perhaps a different kind
wouldn't hurt as much.

I don't know about glasses.
youidiota@yahoo.com - 27 May 2005 05:20 GMT
thanks i didn't really check out the site cus it's nighttime and i'm
tired.  I'm not sure what my prescription is though.  Hey that other
guy just said wearing weak glasses is pointless.  Maybe the minute you
start wearing glasses you're screwed.
SOL_Express - 27 May 2005 06:06 GMT
> thanks i didn't really check out the site cus it's nighttime and i'm
> tired.  I'm not sure what my prescription is though.  Hey that other
> guy just said wearing weak glasses is pointless.  Maybe the minute you
> start wearing glasses you're screwed.

It'll be there if you want to check. What I did was get my contacts fit
professionally, obtained my prescription, and then just ordered a
year's supply online. It was a heck of a lot cheaper than buying
straight from the optometrist.

Customer service at that site told me that (in Canada) a prescription
is not required to purchase contacts, but it is required to make
returns or exchanges on unused contacts.
Marginal Product - 27 May 2005 05:56 GMT
Glasses are only intended for two I's. Sorry, but you do go on a bit
about them, very much in the first person. This is me being insensitive
but what's the fuss? The good thing is that technology in this field is
always improving. In a few years, corrective surgery may be available
for the most severe cases.

Your optician should be able to advise you on lenses and glasses- tell
him/her that you have irritation!

> As a child my windows had cloudy stickers on them similar to the color
> of a plastic bag.  So the farthest distance my eyes were exposed to
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> this is not the way it is.  Please, I need someone to respond, my
> thoughts are unstable.
youidiota@yahoo.com - 28 May 2005 04:20 GMT
> Glasses are only intended for two I's. Sorry, but you do go on a bit
> about them, very much in the first person. This is me being insensitive
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> > this is not the way it is.  Please, I need someone to respond, my
> > thoughts are unstable.

You wonder why I am worried about glasses?  Lemme ask you, what is YOUR
prescription and how bad are YOUR eyes?  If they are nowhere above 6
diopters then you don't know how I feel.  How would you like being in
your house and when you take your glasses off and you misplace them.
Then you can't find them and you get all scared.  How would like being
judged by other people, having bulging eyes, and them acting like it is
your fault when it is not.  How would you like to be highly at risk for
glaucoma, macular degeneration, cataracts, or detached retina at 30
when you KNOW it was all preventable?  Have you ever tried glasses on
that are too strong?  Why don't you try some really strong glasses on
for a few hours and then you'll see what I mean.  How would like being
a little kid and them giving you glasses, and telling you that you look
okay, that if you worry about your image, then there's something wrong
with you, that you shouldn't worry about the way you look.  This is
exactly the opposite of the truth.  We care about how we look.  If we
didn't care, then we would be attracted to the ugliest person and then
have ugly kids, because looks don't matter.  But we're not, we all
strive for perfection, we want to look the best possible, and when
you're asian, and you got a flat face, glasses will make you look much
much worse.  If you're white and have defined facial features, maybe
you're okay, but if you're asian you're screwed.  If I didn't wear
glasses a lot less people would call me ugly.  They act as if it's my
fault I wanted to wear glasses.  People say you should take
responsibility for yourself.  How do I take responsibility when the
world is full of lies, and when you think you're taking responsibility
for yourself by "studying hard" you're just making your life worse.
How would you feel if you argued with your mom, and because she is
bipolar and a women, she just tells you to "shut up" and to stop
worring about this you can't change and to start worrying about things
you can change.  What if she doesn't even take responsibility for your
myopia?  What if when nudity is on a movie she puts her hand over your
eyes?  Thats like her wishing that you were temporarily blind when
there is a nude scene?  See how stupid women and our government and the
optometric community is?  And Christians, they suck too.  Really, am I
going to have myopia in hell?  Really, is it God who made me blind?  I
must have done sins, when the only sin I did was being born into a
house with no windows.  Give me a F'ing break...
Marginal Product - 28 May 2005 06:15 GMT
>>Glasses are only intended for two I's. Sorry, but you do go on a bit
>>about them, very much in the first person. This is me being insensitive
[quoted text clipped - 105 lines]
> must have done sins, when the only sin I did was being born into a
> house with no windows.  Give me a F'ing break...

I'm sorry you have all this anger, and you're right that I can't
understand that level of shortsightedness but I'm sure your feelings are
valid. It's kind of interesting that you talk so much about appearances
being important because obviously appearances mean nothing here. The
overall _image_ you give people is based partly on your appearance but
also on your manner, attitude, actions and so on. There are heaps of
good looking but totally conceited people and to many of us I'm sure
they are the most repulsive. The nicer kind of people around find that
the nature of a person is of far more importance than sheer appearance.
I know it sounds like empty platitudes to you because your experience
has so far revolved perhaps exclusively around bad luck. But it's true!

Now, I can't see you're going to get a girl fancy you while you're still
hating all women. Do you like girls as things to look at and nothing
more? Sure, there are loads of silly, superficial, stupid girls (as
there are boys) who seem to be abundant in the teenage years. But the
more mature ones can make lovely company! Of course, the teenage years
are frought with difficulty for many people but it usually just takes a
bit of patience.

Regardless of how you feel about yourself and people around you, you're
young and everything about you has plenty of change to occur yet,
appearance, demeanor and opinions. And in addition to that, I don't
think you've given any reason why you'd have to wear glasses indefinitely.

I'm sorry about the way you've been treated but it's in the past. Your
mum has her own problems and IF she had anything to do with your
condition she wasn't to know about it. Can you imagine what it's like
for her to deal with bipolar as well as feeling helpless over your
suffering? I bet she would even appreciate some support herself.

And at the end, you've just got to move on man! You've been stewing
about having no windows in your room for the last decade or more? You
can't change it. It's too late to blame everyone. Falling back on that
anger is like falling back on thin air. What are your goals and why
would you let anything get in your way?
~ vera ~ - 27 May 2005 14:37 GMT
> As a child my windows had cloudy stickers on them similar to the color
> of a plastic bag.  So the farthest distance my eyes were exposed to
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
> could just golddig men, but this is not the way it is.  Please, I
> need someone to respond, my thoughts are unstable.

Hi (((((((Whateveryournameis)))))))),

when I was 16 - which is long ago - I had the same proplem you are having
now. No, I will not tell you it is no problem. I know it is a very big
problem. I am short-sighted, too, and had to we glasses. But I tried the
contacts, and I can tell you, the first week or two was a horror. But then
after that my eyes got used to them, and I am still wearing contacts. How
long have you tried to wear them? I know it hurts in the beginning, but it
could really be worthwhile trying it again, just ignoring the pain and bad
feeling, knowing what you will get. I think this would be the best solution
there is.

But I am also sure that you can get new light glasses. Maybe there is a
possibility to repair the surface of yours??? You should simply ask the
specialist. If you want to, I can also do some research in the Internet for
you and try to find ways.

Being short-sighted does not come from reading at school, by the way, but
you are usually born with it - as far as I know.

Did you know that surgeons can replace complete lenses in the eye, and that
this is a rather simple surgery, as I have heard??? Would that be possible
maybe? But one had to be very brave for a while.

Did you also know that my diopters were reduced by 1, and I think by wearing
contacs? But nobody can really tell you why.

What is "Diabolo 2 Expansion"? A computer game? Some years ago I also liked
to play computer games with my son. He will be 15 in August.

Okay, the worst thing that might happen now is that you cannot continue to
wear the glasses you are wearing now - is that right? I am sure that you can
get new ones. I am sure there will be a way to get them if necessary. Maybe
we could even try to have a collection for it here or on my website. I would
start and give money for that, too.

Maybe we could find a church and a priest in California who takes care of
this collection. I am sure there is a way that people know that the right
person will get the money. That is a problem, of course.

Bye for now,

Vera
Wooly - 27 May 2005 15:27 GMT
I suspect there are other things going on in your life that are
causing your apparent depression.  The wearing of glasses, for most of
us with Rx's as strong as yours, is a good thing, not a bad thing.

If you are unable to wear your spectacles because they don't improve
your vision adequately (or possibly because they overcorrect your
vision, equally uncomfortable) then you need to see your optometrist.

Myopia reversal is so much bullshit.  The quacks on the list who push
their theories of "myopia reversal" and "self-treament of myopia"
cannot produce any reputable studies to back up their claims and their
supposed succes stories never do check in with testimonials and
scientific documentation of their vision improvement.  

Find a mental health professional, have your spectacles Rx checked.

Wooly "a progressive myope since age 3" Grrl

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET.
This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%.  
Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
youidiota@yahoo.com - 28 May 2005 04:30 GMT
I don't believe myopia reversal is bullshit, I just believe that it is
to late for me.  I know someone who is now 20/15.  He wore glasses in
China and had been through 3 pairs.  He lost it for 2 months and in
that time his vision healed.  He was around 10.  10 seems to be the age
that you can heal 10 and below.  Any age above that is probably going
to take really long, like decades or something.  I'm sure that people
who have myopia that are low can heal it.  But I've worn glasses 9
years straight.  To "heal" seems impossible.  Yes that is nine years
straight without ever taking them off.  I was afraid of the blur.
Nowadays people's eye doctors tell them not to wear glasses in fear of
making myopia worse.  HOW COME LENSCRAFTERS NEVER TOLD ME THAT?  You
know I wouldn't mind being a low myope, but being a severe myope, and
it's not even my fault, that's just depressing.
And no I don't think anything else is causing my depression.  Maybe
because I am badlooking I am depressed because it will be harder to get
a job or something, but I can assure you all of my problems are caused
by myopia.  They all go back to it.
Wooly - 28 May 2005 14:08 GMT
>Nowadays people's eye doctors tell them not to wear glasses in fear of
>making myopia worse.  HOW COME LENSCRAFTERS NEVER TOLD ME THAT?  

I don't know of any reputable opthalmologist or optometrist who
subscribes to the theory that not wearing one's glasses will
miraculously cause one's myopia to improve.  It will, however,
encourage premature wrinkling about the eyes from all the squinting
required.

My last Rx was for -975 and -625 so I'm not too sympathetic to your
steep Rx.  I wouldn't dream of getting out of bed without my
spectacles, let alone trying to function outside the shower without
them.  I've been wearing spectacles for more than 30 years.  I view
them as a necessary appliance that allow me to enjoy a quality life.
My retainer, which I wear to bed every night more than 20 years after
my braces came off, is more of a pain in my a.s than my spectacles
are.

The fact that I wear spectacles has never been a burden, except in the
few sports limitations I've had to adjust to over the years.  I
certainly never considered damaging myself merely because I wear
spectacles.

I really do think you've got other stuff going on and you're blaming
your poor eyesight for whatever else is truly the core issue behind
your depression.  Have your Rx checked, have correct spectacles made,
and decide to deal with your problems in a more mature fashion.  I
think you'll find you'll be perfectly able to function with some
plastic bits on your face.

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET.
This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%.  
Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
Dr. Leukoma - 28 May 2005 17:45 GMT
You can believe what you want to believe.  Unfortunately, when one's
beliefs do not correspond to physical reality, there is bound to be
dissonance.  Of course it is not your fault that you are myopic.  In
your case, it is genetic.  You are what you are like a stone is a stone
and water is water.  There is nothing you could have done to change the
outcome, and so do not keep blaming yourself, your parents, or
Lenscrafters.  You are a living organism, with a purpose, and you just
have to figure out what that purpose is.

In all probability, you are highly intelligent.  Many myopes are.
Because of their intelligence, they like to read, and there is an
association between reading and myopia in susceptible individuals.  Use
your intelligence to figure out a pragmatic solution to your situation.

DrG
youidiota@yahoo.com - 29 May 2005 05:32 GMT
So it's normal to only be able to see 4 inches away from my face?
That's genetic?

If you ask me...

Anyone with myopia that bad would have been elminated a long long time
ago.  Obviously no one can function with a maximum focal point of 4
inches.  You cannot read a book with the book on the desk, because it's
too blurry.  The only thing I can do is read a book on a bed, which,
ironically is how I got myopia in the first place, that, and... not
having a window.

Also, I have affirmed that almost everyone in 11th grade says that
their doctor tells them not to wear glasses all the time or else it
will get worse.  These are the low myopes.  There are some people,
however, who wear glasses all the time.

So why do some people wear glasses all the time and so people wear them
not all the time?  The answer?  It all depends on what their doctor
told them.

And think about it anyway, if the doctors admit that too much glasses
wearing is bad, then why won't they admit that a little glasses wearing
is bad, and that any glasses use at all is bad.  Glasses are, afterall,
homeopathic.

It all depends on what your doctor tells you.  When you first get your
glasses you say that it hurts and then they say, you'll get used to it.
You take this on as a homework assignment and then you get used to it.
Then you wear it all the time, because the doctor implied that you
should be able to, if you work hard enough, by which I mean making your
eyes working hard enough.

I have never had a doctor tell me that wearing glasses all the time
would be detrimental.  I have never been that lucky.  It seems like all
the people with severe myopia wear glasses all the time, while the
people with light myopia don't.

Also, if glasses don't hurt the eyes, then what is that great pain
caused by accomodation when you try them on?  What exactly is happening
there?
Dr. Leukoma - 29 May 2005 13:22 GMT
> So it's normal to only be able to see 4 inches away from my face?
> That's genetic?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ironically is how I got myopia in the first place, that, and... not
> having a window.

Funny how homo sapiens survived as a species.  We're not particularly
strong, we're not particularly fast, but we are clever.

> Also, I have affirmed that almost everyone in 11th grade says that
> their doctor tells them not to wear glasses all the time or else it
> will get worse.  These are the low myopes.  There are some people,
> however, who wear glasses all the time.

Maybe most of the 11th graders in your class go to the same eccentric
eye doctor.

> So why do some people wear glasses all the time and so people wear them
> not all the time?  The answer?  It all depends on what their doctor
> told them.

I've worn glasses all the time since age 7 years, and I read alot, too
(or at least I did as a kid).  I never got worse than -4.00.  I am now
-3.25.

> And think about it anyway, if the doctors admit that too much glasses
> wearing is bad, then why won't they admit that a little glasses wearing
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> caused by accomodation when you try them on?  What exactly is happening
> there?

I never had any pain from accommodation when I wore eyeglasses.
Perhaps there is something wrong with your particular
accommodative/convergence system.  I seldom, if ever, hear that
complaint from my patients.

Now, it looks to me like you have cobbled together some anecdotal
information combined with just plain bad information.  If you would
spend more time doing scientific research instead of internet surfing,
I think you can begin to get the picture, which is that high myopia
tends to be hereditary, and that reading makes some myopes worse at
different rates.  However, the conclusion from most scientists who make
their careers out of studying this problem is that there is
insufficient evidence about what causes myopia to warrant any change in
the philosophy about prescribing eyeglasses.

DrG
Wooly - 29 May 2005 14:07 GMT
>Now, it looks to me like you have cobbled together some anecdotal
>information combined with just plain bad information.

It seems to me as tho the kid has decided to blame his woes on his
poor eyesight and his dislike of corrective lenses.  If he can just
"fix" his eyes every other problem in his life will miraculously
disappear.

Wooly
with a freshly-laundered microfiber cleaning cloth

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET.
This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%.  
Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
Mike Tyner - 29 May 2005 22:03 GMT
> Also, I have affirmed that almost everyone in 11th grade says that
> their doctor tells them not to wear glasses all the time or else it
> will get worse.

Then they might all have the same doctor with antiquated views. These days,
medical and optometry schools teach something different.

> And think about it anyway, if the doctors admit that too much glasses
> wearing is bad, then why won't they admit that a little glasses wearing
> is bad, and that any glasses use at all is bad.  Glasses are, afterall,
> homeopathic.

The problem is that we most conditions, we can't measure any different in
the rates of deterioration between those who wear glasses and those who
don't.

> Also, if glasses don't hurt the eyes, then what is that great pain
> caused by accomodation when you try them on?  What exactly is happening
> there?

Nearsighted people don't have to accommodate so they get spoiled.

-MT
youidiota@yahoo.com - 01 Jun 2005 01:07 GMT
> > Also, I have affirmed that almost everyone in 11th grade says that
> > their doctor tells them not to wear glasses all the time or else it
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> -MT

Let me make this clear.  It is not accomodative pain.  But there is a
great amount of pain associated with  trying on glasses.  There is more
pain the stronger the glasses are.  I'm just wondering, if they fully
correct your eyes, then there should be no pain at all right?
Mike Tyner - 01 Jun 2005 04:32 GMT
> Let me make this clear.  It is not accomodative pain.  But there is a
> great amount of pain associated with  trying on glasses.  There is more
> pain the stronger the glasses are.  I'm just wondering, if they fully
> correct your eyes, then there should be no pain at all right?

Accommodation isn't the only thing that changes when you put glasses on, but
it's the most likely explanation if you have several pair and they all hurt
in progressive degrees. "Accommodative pain" can be as bad as a toothache.
How is that different from your pain?

Two questions. It's important to know if your temples are tight enough to
leave a groove in your skin. And do you tend to see double when you relax
with the glasses on? If not, accommodation is pretty much the only rational
cause, other than emotional reactions.

Otis Brown is a cruel man and he's worked his magic on you. The Chinese
don't successfully "treat" myopia. So far they haven't published any
successful techniques in the journals we get outside China. The Chinese (and
Singaporeans and Japanese) have more myopia and so they have more motivation
to find a treatment. But they still haven't found any special lenses that
improve it, nor have they found those wearing glasses get more nearsighted
than those who don't. It just doesn't happen. Instead, you'll find
considerable excitement over a drug called pirenzepine, which *DOES*
reliably slow myopia. It *DOESN'T* reverse it.

If you could go back and start over, about the only thing you could do is
avoid reading and writing. That *MIGHT* help. But you should ignore the
flakes and read real articles written by real (PhD, OD, MD) researchers who
don't sell glasses. The higher your myopia, the more likely it is genetic.

-MT
John Yasar - 01 Jun 2005 10:30 GMT
>The Chinese (and
>Singaporeans and Japanese) have more myopia and so they have more motivation
>to find a treatment.

What a true statement! I am in Korea and boy these guys wear some thick
glasses. Hereditary or they read a lot? However their life standards
show me that it is probably not due to a lot of reading!

Signature

PV2 Yasar, M
U.S. ARMY
AH-64D "Armt Dawg"
A Co/602d ASB/2ID/EUSA - South Korea
Wednesday, 01 Jun 2005 / 18:30:47 Korea Standard Time (+0900)

Dan Abel - 01 Jun 2005 19:09 GMT
> Also, I have affirmed that almost everyone in 11th grade says that
> their doctor tells them not to wear glasses all the time or else it
> will get worse.

Next time I need vision advice, I'll seek out an 11th grader.  No sense
paying good money to see a doctor if I can get just as good advice for
free.

:-(

> And think about it anyway, if the doctors admit that too much glasses
> wearing is bad, then why won't they admit that a little glasses wearing
> is bad, and that any glasses use at all is bad.  Glasses are, afterall,
> homeopathic.

Salt is an essential nutrient.  Too much salt is bad for you.  Calories
are an essential nutrient, too many calories are bad for you.  Besides,
I've never had a doctor say that too much wearing of glasses is harmful.

> It all depends on what your doctor tells you.  When you first get your
> glasses you say that it hurts and then they say, you'll get used to it.

I've never had glasses make my eyes hurt, and never met anybody else with
that problem.  That's not to say that it doesn't happen, but I don't
believe it is usual.

> I have never had a doctor tell me that wearing glasses all the time
> would be detrimental.  I have never been that lucky.  It seems like all
> the people with severe myopia wear glasses all the time, while the
> people with light myopia don't.

People with broken or otherwise damaged legs use crutches to get around.
People with normal legs don't use crutches.  Why not?

Signature

Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net

youidiota@yahoo.com - 02 Jun 2005 00:06 GMT
People with normal legs don't use crutches because they don't need
them, yet.  Don't use the crutch analogy on me.  I believe eyesight is
much more important than legs.  Also, legs can heal, eyes cannot, eyes
can only get worse.

You say you never had glasses hurt your eyes, are you even nearsighted?

You say you were highly myopic.  So, when you put on glasses, you feel
NOTHING?
Dan Abel - 02 Jun 2005 17:57 GMT
> People with normal legs don't use crutches because they don't need
> them, yet.  Don't use the crutch analogy on me.  I believe eyesight is
> much more important than legs.  Also, legs can heal, eyes cannot, eyes
> can only get worse.

Eyesight is much more important than legs, I agree.  However, glasses
almost completely correct vision.  Crutches are a poor substitute for
having two good legs.  Sometimes legs can heal.  Some problems never heal
and never can.  How many times have you heard of a missing leg growing
back?  Doesn't happen.  Also, eyes often get better.  My myopia decreased
when I got older.  It was totally eliminated as a byproduct of cataract
surgery.


> You say you never had glasses hurt your eyes, are you even nearsighted?

No, I am not nearsighted any more.  I had surgery (see above).  I was -10D
and -12D at the worst.  Glasses never hurt my eyes.


> You say you were highly myopic.  So, when you put on glasses, you feel
> NOTHING?

I felt no pain or physical pleasure.  I was certainly happy that I could
see with my glasses.  The farthest away I could focus without glasses was
about one inch.  I could not even read without glasses, except by closing
one eye and moving the book back and forth in front of the other eye.

I wore glasses constantly, except for sleeping and bathing, for 35 years.

Signature

Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net

youidiota@yahoo.com - 03 Jun 2005 00:39 GMT
It's nice to know that you can be myopic and still be successful Dan
Abel.
Dan Abel - 01 Jun 2005 21:02 GMT
> Glasses are, afterall,
> homeopathic.

My dictionary says that homeopathy is a drug treatment.  Glasses are not
drugs.  I don't understand what you are saying here.

Signature

Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net

youidiota@yahoo.com - 02 Jun 2005 00:12 GMT
Do glasses not get you addicted?  Think about it.  Glasses are worse
than any other drug in the world.
Dr. Leukoma - 02 Jun 2005 03:14 GMT
If you mean addicted to clear vision, then yes, I agree.

DrG
Wooly - 02 Jun 2005 04:08 GMT
I've been wearing glasses for more than 30 years.  No
spectacles-induced cancers or other health problems.  I have, however,
managed to avoid being hit by cars, managed to avoid falling into open
manholes, managed to avoid hitting people while operating a vehicle.
I can participate in team sports, individual sports.  I can go out for
my morning run confident that I'll see the curbs coming and adjust my
stride to accomodate them.  These are just a few of the health
benefits of wearing spectacles that I've enjoyed

On a cosmetic front, since I wear spectacles and enjoy clear vision I
need not squint at things more than a few inches from my nose in order
to see them.  Not squinting has greatly reduced the development of
crows'-feet wrinkles around my eyes.  Prescription sunglass lenses in
a pair of spectacle frames will greatly help in this as well.

Shall I go on?

I went to elementary school with kids who smoked; three of them were
dead of lung cancer before they turned 35.

The guy I didn't go to senior prom with (I turned up with strep that
morning) got drunk after prom and drove into a phone pole at about
75mph.  He and four of my good friends didn't make it home that night.

The "chemist" I knew in college who fabricated the best LSD I ever had
piled into a bridge abutment when he was tripping.  He didn't go home
either.

The daughter of a friend of the family took one "taste" of crack at a
party in 1996.  She died of AIDS last year, which she probably
contracted through needlesharing, or possibly through the prostitution
she engaged in so that she could buy that next fix.

None of the people I described above wore spectacles or contact
lenses.

What were you saying about glasses being a bad drug?

>Do glasses not get you addicted?  Think about it.  Glasses are worse
>than any other drug in the world.

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET.
This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%.  
Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
youidiota@yahoo.com - 03 Jun 2005 00:27 GMT
> I've been wearing glasses for more than 30 years.  No
> spectacles-induced cancers or other health problems.  I have, however,
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%.
> Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...

Wooly.  You're stories of tragedies with drugs are very horrible,
especially the AIDS one.  But that just shows how great their lives
were.  They lived their golden years.  Us with myopia don't have golden
years.  Today I just saw some guy in my Chinese class wearing glasses.
I remember that he used to try on my glasses out of curiosity.

My entire life has sucked feeling ugly in glasses, not being able to
floss without grinning to keep the frames over my eyes, constantly
pushing my glasses up, always having a bad time in school because I
couldn't see the board because of staircase myopia.

Although your stories of drugs-gone-wrong, glasses are still the worst
drug in the world.  Doctors prescribe glasses, but yet they are
hesitant to prescribe marijuana.  Negative lenses are drug that do not
feel good.  The doctor assumes no responsibility for any damage that
they do to your eyes.  There is no way to "break the habit" of wearing
glasses "cold turkey".  At least it is possible to stop doing all
drugs.  What's worse is that glasses are seen as a sign of
intelligence, not as poison for the eyes.  Glasses are highly
addictive, costly, and impossible to break free from.  Glasses are the
most evil drug ever, they don't even feel good, they arn't cool, need I
say more?

There, I have proven you wrong.

And don't tell me you can look at the ground with your glasses, your
field of vision is severely limited.  Don't be a fool.
Dan Abel - 03 Jun 2005 19:26 GMT
> My entire life has sucked feeling ugly in glasses, not being able to
> floss without grinning to keep the frames over my eyes, constantly
> pushing my glasses up, always having a bad time in school because I

It's important to have frames that fit.  I would suggest that you visit
your optician and explain that your glasses won't stay up.  If this can't
be fixed, then get new frames.

> couldn't see the board because of staircase myopia.

There's no excuse for this.  I don't know what state you are posting from,
but here in California, it costs the state roughly US$5,000 per year for
an elementary school education.  Most states spend more, and I expect that
high school is also more.  I spend US$25.00 per lens.  Your frames, once
you get them adjusted or replaced, should last for years without
replacement.  Even if you get your lenses replaced every six months,
that's US$100 per year, less than the cost of one fancy coffee per week.
Don't throw away your education for lack of US$.50 per school day, a small
fraction of what the state is paying for your education.  Of course, if
you are in a private school, the cost is certainly much more.

Signature

Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net

Wooly - 05 Jun 2005 06:07 GMT
>Although your stories of drugs-gone-wrong, glasses are still the worst
>drug in the world.  Doctors prescribe glasses, but yet they are
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
>There, I have proven you wrong.

No, you've merely proven that your dislike of spectacles is at the
root of your self-loathing.  Good luck passing your DMV eye exam
without your spectacles.

>And don't tell me you can look at the ground with your glasses, your
>field of vision is severely limited.  Don't be a fool.

I'll tell you any damned thing I please.  My field of vision is
excellent.  My glasses are properly fitted and provide me with
excellent vision in nearly 100% of my peripheral field.  If I look
down, there's the ground; if I look up, there's the sky complete with
a bird, or a plane, or occasionally a jackass newscopter).

Thanks to decrepitude I'm beginning to have some change-of-focus
issues.  Bifocals are going to suck...

+++++++++++++

Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET.
This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%.  
Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...
Dan Abel - 02 Jun 2005 17:51 GMT
> Do glasses not get you addicted?  Think about it.

I've thought about it.  I'm not addicted to my car, even though I drive it
often.  I'm not addicted to my newspapers, even though I read them often.
I'm not addicted to my house, even though I've lived there for almost 30
years.  I'm not addicted to glasses, even though I wear them every day
(reading glasses now).

Signature

Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net

youidiota@yahoo.com - 03 Jun 2005 00:33 GMT
You're presbyopic?  I thought you were myopic.  If you are presbyopic
and are 20/20 I respect you, but if you are myopic and declare that you
are not addicted to concave lenses then that is a lie.  You know it's
true.  Or maybe you're financially secure and maybe you really don't
need glasses.  How old are you and what is your Rx?
Dan Abel - 03 Jun 2005 23:45 GMT
> You're presbyopic?  I thought you were myopic.

A person may be both, which I was.  I am now 55, and started presbyopia in
my early 40s.  I developed cataract in both eyes, and had surgery in both
eyes to correct it.  I was very myopic for most of my life, -10D and -12D
at the worst.  I wore glasses for 35 years, pretty much full time.  I wore
contacts for about 10 years after that.  For most cataract surgery, myopia
and hyperopia (but not astigmatism) can be corrected as a byproduct of the
surgery.  I am no longer myopic in either eye, and wear no distance
correction.

>  If you are presbyopic
> and are 20/20 I respect you,

I guess that you aren't going to respect me, then.  I had a retinal
detachment in my right eye about 10 years ago, and have suffered a minor
but permanent vision loss in that eye.  I can only be corrected to 20/25
in the right eye, and that number is deceiving, since I don't see nearly
as well with the right eye as with the left, even fully corrected.

> but if you are myopic and declare that you
> are not addicted to concave lenses then that is a lie.  You know it's

I simply didn't consider it to be an addiction.  Glasses and contacts were
tools that enabled me to live my life easier.  Perhaps this is just a
terminology issue.  They were certainly very important to me.

> true.  Or maybe you're financially secure and maybe you really don't
> need glasses.  How old are you and what is your Rx?

It doesn't matter whether you are financially secure or not.  Someone with
lots of money still wants to be able to see.  What good is it to have the
money to travel to exotic places (if that's what a person wants to do) if
you can't see anything while you are there?

I'm 55, and plano in both eyes, with 1.75D of astigmatism in the right
eye, and a +2.00 add.  Since the vision in my right eye is poor even when
corrected, I seldom wear my toric contact lens in that eye.  I need to get
a third opinion from an OD.  One OD said that correction would not help my
vision.  My OMD disagreed, and suggested that I see a different OD for
another opinion.

Signature

Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net

Dan Abel - 01 Jun 2005 19:13 GMT
> know I wouldn't mind being a low myope, but being a severe myope, and
> it's not even my fault, that's just depressing.
> And no I don't think anything else is causing my depression.  Maybe
> because I am badlooking I am depressed because it will be harder to get
> a job or something, but I can assure you all of my problems are caused
> by myopia.  They all go back to it.

I don't have a lot of sympathy.  I was a high myope myself for 35 years.
You just put on your glasses (or contacts) and deal with it.  The glasses
are a hassle, but they almost fully correct the problem.  I see people who
have uncorrectable vision, who are missing a leg, or missing an arm.  They
have much more severe problems, but most of them lead fully functional
lives.  They compensate for their problems.  You barely need to do any
compensation for severe myopia.  I know, I've been there.  I've had
cataract surgery in both eyes, and am no longer myopic at all.  It's nice
and it's convenient, but I'm still the same person, and still do the same
things.

Your problem is not with mypia, it is with your mind.  You need to seek
counseling to learn to live with what you were born with.  For those
people born without a leg, it wasn't their fault either.  It *is* their
responsibility to learn to live with it.

Signature

Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net

KelleyandHall@gmail.com - 27 May 2005 18:58 GMT
Youidi,

I noticed that you also recently posted a question about alternative
methods of suicide,  and more specifically, your thoughts about jumping
off
the Golden Gate bridge.

Please, please, please talk to someone--a real live person, not just a
faceless person on the Internet chat board--about these feelings.
Please realize that the feelings of self-hatred and unhappiness and
despair are COMPLETELY NORMAL for someone your age. Everyone goes
through bad patches. But you are so young and you have no idea how much
the future holds for you.  You have so much to live for that you
don't/can't even realize at this point in your life.

Is there someone that you can talk to? A
friend/counselor/teacher/family member?
youidiota@yahoo.com - 28 May 2005 04:44 GMT
You f.cking idiot.  You're email sounds like a girls.  See this is why
women are stupid.  Look my problem is NOT NORMAL.  I told you already,
no one has SEVERE MYOPIA like me.  It is very rare in San Francisco,
and it is NOT NORMAL OKAY?  I've went to a psychologist who is a women.
Remember women are the idiots who tell us not to masturbate and look
at porn and want us to be blind so we can't look at porn.  Well I'm
blind.  Oh yeah and to all the teachers.  Look I'm blind, now I can't
cheat on tests and look at other people's papers who sit next to me.
Now I have a limited field of vision.  HAPPY NOW?  Look it is very rare
for someone to HAVE NO WINDOWS.  My psychologist is a women who does
not wear glasses.  Maybe she had lasik.  My couselor has presbyopia and
might have had lasik but i don't think so.  WHY ARE WOMEN GIVEN JOBS?
Look if I tried to talk to her about glasses, she should say that I am
depressed, that I have low self esteem, which is basically calling me
ugly because only ugly people have low self esteem.  WHAT?  A woman
would say that people should have high self image even if they are
ugly, that looks don't matter, skin color doesn't matter.  Did you know
that my mom's skin tone is so dark people think she's philipino?  Do
you know I have the darkest skin in my class in 7th grade?  And I'm
from Hong Kong, not Africa.  People who think looks don't matter are
stupid.  And they always have to be so vague.  You say looks don't
matter?  CAN YOU BE MORE SPECIFIC?  Excuse me but looks don't matter in
ahem, which situations, jobs, relationships?  Okay then go marry an
ugly person on purpose.  What'd you say?  We're all equal?  Yeah I'm
sure we all have the same amount of money.  Idiot.  Second thing about
women, when they talk they talk and only care about how they feel, not
how you feel, so you could go to a psychologist and they will just call
you ugly over and over again, I'm not kidding.  Women suck.
~ vera ~ - 27 May 2005 20:19 GMT
> As a child my windows had cloudy stickers on them similar to the color
> of a plastic bag.  So the farthest distance my eyes were exposed to
[quoted text clipped - 58 lines]
> this is not the way it is.  Please, I need someone to respond, my
> thoughts are unstable.

Dear one,

I have asked my friend in California, and she had the following ideas that
might help you:

========start quote======

"The Lyons Club donates glasses to people all the time. They have been doing
it for years. I am sure there is a local chapter, perhaps many in San
Francisco. They especially like to donate to children because they are the
most needy.

There are also solutions that you can put on the lenses that will remove the
scratches, but everytime you wash the lenses you must reapply the solution.
I have seen it advertised on HSN (home shopping network.) HSN.com might have
it too.

Who know, the Lyons club might even be able to do more, buy new
glasses/contacts, or perhaps help with the needed surgery. It never hurts to
ask and plead her case."

========end quote======

And she thinks that "beauty is not something we put on our eyes, it is what
we put in our eyes. Beauty is more than make up, it is being useful,
compassionate, understanding, loving, and loveable."

I bet you have these things.

She also gave me an ancient Chinese Proverb for you:

If there is right in the soul,
There will be beauty in the person.
If there is beauty in the person,
There will be harmony in the home.
If there is harmony in the home,
There will be order in the nation,
If there is order in the nation,
There will be peace in the world.
(Ancient Chinese Proverb)

Maybe that helps, but I know what it is like at the age of 16, too.

So maybe the Lion's Club could be of help for you. Shall I find out for you
if there is a chance?

Peace,

~ vera ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
youidiota@yahoo.com - 28 May 2005 04:53 GMT
So you're saying that because I do not have outer beauty, my soul is
wrong?  WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?  See what I mean when I say all these
feminist things are so vague?  "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder".
Really?  Then why are all the popular kids goodlooking?  I mean common
what the hell does that phrase mean?  All I know is that it gives false
hope to ugly people.

And about the Lion's club, well, I don't even know my prescription and,
so far, I still have these glasses, also I don't know if I can get a
job with glasses this blurry, we will have to see.  Time will tell my
destiny.
Tom - 29 May 2005 11:39 GMT
>So you're saying that because I do not have outer beauty, my soul is
>wrong?  WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?  See what I mean when I say all these
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>job with glasses this blurry, we will have to see.  Time will tell my
>destiny.

You don't think you can get a job because you are myopic?  Good grief
man.  How do you think the rest of the world copes?

Many of your American peers will be fat... that's far more revolting
to look at than a pair of glasses.

Tom
~ vera ~ - 29 May 2005 23:59 GMT
> So you're saying that because I do not have outer beauty, my soul is
> wrong?  WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?  See what I mean when I say all these
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> get a job with glasses this blurry, we will have to see.  Time will
> tell my destiny.

Beauty is very relative. Have you watched that cyber movie - what was thast
name - where the ugly guy married the ugly princess in the end... hey, I
mean the movie with the donkey, you will know it. Was it an Ork? I have
forgotten. Bad memory. The one with those ears - oh, you will surely know.

Hm... who says that all popular kids are good-looking? YOU think they are,
while others might think YOU are good-looking. What are "ugly" people? I
really cannot say there are such people. I for my part have found out that
it does not mean much to be good-looking.  It is your mind and heart that is
important.

So and if you have to wear these glasses - why not simply stand behind it?
You are not your glasses, are you? If people just see your glasses, they are
not worth to be seen by you.

Head up, and get a bulb.

=O

:-)

Ask the others if they do not feel naked without glasses.

Or try the contacts again, maybe a different sort. I am also sure that you
could find out your prescription. Maybe you just go there where you got your
glasses from and ask there. Hey, you are 16!

Oh, but do not remind me... it was a terrible age for me. I always was in
love and had heartache, because I fell in love with those who were not
interested in me while others wanted to date me, but I did not want to go
out with them... It was a terrible time, really. But it became better when I
was a little older. Much better.

Peace,

~ vera ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
youidiota@yahoo.com - 01 Jun 2005 01:22 GMT
If beauty is so relative, then why does everyone call me ugly?

Think about it, define popularity.  Popularity is something that you
want.  If you see a member of the opposite sex that you want, but
cannot get, they automatically become popular.  You can look at a
person and determine whether they are popular or not.

Why don't you get an ugly girl and see how popular she becomes?  The
guys won't want to have anything to do with her.

Also, the movie you're talking about, "Shrek", they looked like black
people.  Giant foreheads, giant noses.

If you think about it black people are the ugliest people.  Skin
complexion represents about 50% of beauty.  The rest is facial
structure.  Just face it, for some reason dark skin is ugly and looks
like dirt.

And why don't I wear contacts?  I told you my grandma called me ugly in
some language that I don't understand.  And people say I look angry and
call me ugly even when I wear contacts.  In fact they make fun of me
more, scoffing at the fact that I'm trying to improve my vision.  Just
today someone kept talking about my eyes, and how giant they are.  Do
you know what caused this?  Glasses.  That's right.

And to wooly, wooly ... look there are some people who wear glasses and
don't have severe myopia and are goodlooking.  But most people are
really ugly and put on glasses and get even uglier.  I guess you could
put me in this category.  If I never wore glasses, I would look
slightly better, I would save myself a lot of embarrassment from
walking up to the board.  Blah blah blah...

I'm starting to think that glasses are a byproduct of civilization.
It's not normal to have no windows, and then get glasses and make it
worse infinitely.  And no one except me sees this as a serious problem,
while the rest of us don't give a damn.  I just wish I could have gone
back in time, and gave myself a chance to be 20/20.

But only in China do they prevent myopia.  I guess when nations are
civilized and the public is uneducated about the eye, it is inevitable
for them to prevent myopia.  When eye doctors just want to make more
money, it's disgusting.  My question again is why the glasses hurt so
much to break into...
Dr. Leukoma - 01 Jun 2005 02:22 GMT
> If beauty is so relative, then why does everyone call me ugly?
>
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> money, it's disgusting.  My question again is why the glasses hurt so
> much to break into...

OK.  You say they prevent myopia in China?  Well, what about his
article:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Myopia is the most common physical deficiency in the Chinese school age
children and youth. The incidence of myopia are 20.6%, 49.8%, and 65.0%
in the primary school, junior middle school and senior middle school
students, respectively. Moreover, the incidence of myopia still shows a
generally rising tendency, especially in the school girls and
especially among the rural populations. (e.g., it rose from 10.4% to
11.3% in the primary school boys and from 14.4% to 15.7% in the primary
school girls, and it rose from 37.9% to 44.6%, and from 59.29% to 64%
in the junior and senior middle school girls respectively, during the
1985-1995 period). The incidence of myopia is even as high as 76.74% in
the college students, and has risen in the last ten years from 63.9% to
71.7% and from 67.2% to 77.6% in the males and females, respectively.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

It doesn't look they are doing such a great job of preventing myopia in
China.

DrG
youidiota@yahoo.com - 01 Jun 2005 23:25 GMT
> > If beauty is so relative, then why does everyone call me ugly?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>
> DrG

Yeah but at least everyone has it.  People understand in China.  In
fact so many people in China have it that they are starting to see that
it is a problem.

In America if you look ugly with glasses, people will treat you like
you brought this upon yourself.  They will ostracize you.
~ vera ~ - 01 Jun 2005 02:53 GMT
> If beauty is so relative, then why does everyone call me ugly?

Hey, that is a good sign. :-)

> Think about it, define popularity.  Popularity is something that you
> want.  If you see a member of the opposite sex that you want, but
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Why don't you get an ugly girl and see how popular she becomes?  The
> guys won't want to have anything to do with her.

Good for her. All these guys would only want to have to do with her because
she is beautiful??? They would not ask about her soul.

> Also, the movie you're talking about, "Shrek", they looked like black
> people.  Giant foreheads, giant noses.

Shrek! Yes. That was the name I was looking for. I did not see any black
people in them.

Indeed, the most beautiful woman I have ever seen in my life was black. I am
not gay at all, but I stood there when she passed along, and simply wanted
to tell her how beautiful she was. I have never seen such a beautiful woman
again. But id does not say much about the happiness of people. Beautiful
people can be very depressive, too. And, as you said, what is beauty anyway?

> If you think about it black people are the ugliest people.

Oh no! That is absolutely wrong to say - see above.

> Skin
> complexion represents about 50% of beauty.  The rest is facial
> structure.  Just face it, for some reason dark skin is ugly and looks
> like dirt.

No, it does not. Why should western white people sunbathe all the time in
summer just to get tanned if that was the case?

> And why don't I wear contacts?  I told you my grandma called me ugly
> in some language that I don't understand.  And people say I look
> angry and call me ugly even when I wear contacts.  In fact they make
> fun of me more, scoffing at the fact that I'm trying to improve my
> vision.  Just today someone kept talking about my eyes, and how giant
> they are.  Do you know what caused this?  Glasses.  That's right.

Oh really? I have always thought that glasses for short-sighted people make
the eyes look much smaller, not bigger. :-) Hey, you must really have some
special glasses there, right?

> And to wooly, wooly ... look there are some people who wear glasses
> and don't have severe myopia and are goodlooking.  But most people are
> really ugly and put on glasses and get even uglier.  I guess you could
> put me in this category.  If I never wore glasses, I would look
> slightly better, I would save myself a lot of embarrassment from
> walking up to the board.  Blah blah blah...

So it is not the glasses, but how you feel in general?

Be comforted, if people call you ugly, you are surely NOT! One does not tell
people who one thinks to be ugly that they are. I think you might have a
problem which most teenagers have. You just THINK you are ugly. And others
agree - so you are not. :-)

Look, that is me with glasses:

8-)

or with contacts, you see:

:-)

But you say you look angry -> -> -> that's it, maybe. You do not like
yourself, so you look angry. Others do not want much of you because of that,
maybe. If you try to forget your glases for a week... maybe things
change...???? Why not try it out? Just have a look at the other people and
think how funny they look without glasses. Paint them some imaginary, and
you might smile at them. Just watch what happens.

I do not think you are ugly. Nonononono. You are only not self-conscious.

> I'm starting to think that glasses are a byproduct of civilization.
> It's not normal to have no windows, and then get glasses and make it
> worse infinitely.  And no one except me sees this as a serious
> problem, while the rest of us don't give a damn.  I just wish I could
> have gone back in time, and gave myself a chance to be 20/20.

Okay, but you can't, but you can look into the future where people will be
able to operate such things easily. Everything will be fine one day, you
will see.

> But only in China do they prevent myopia.

Why do you keep up yourself with things you cannot change? Why not see what
you can really do to solve this problem??? You can do it. You are old
enough.

> I guess when nations are
> civilized and the public is uneducated about the eye, it is inevitable
> for them to prevent myopia.  When eye doctors just want to make more
> money, it's disgusting.  My question again is why the glasses hurt so
> much to break into...

You see, everybody has a weak spot. Everybody. You can see badly, others may
not feel good for other reasons.

Have you ever thought of meeting other people who have myopia like you? Why
do you not start a meeting with others? You could tell each other how very
ugly you are.

[No, you are a sweetheart, and surely not ugly. Best proof: They tell you!
:-)]

Peace,

~ vera ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
youidiota@yahoo.com - 01 Jun 2005 23:46 GMT
There is no such thing as a soul.  If there is I do not know why it
would have chosen my vessel.

Really?  You really don't believe shrek looked like that guy from the
green mile?

Did that beautiful black women you saw happen to be Zora Neale Hurston?
The women who wrote "How it feels to be Colored Me"?  The one who
brags that, unlike her fellow blacks, she has high self esteem,
confidence, and happiness?  The one who IMPLIES that she is not only
equal to white people, but is superior to them?  The one who wrote that
essay, as if to say, "look at me, I'm black and I have self esteem, I
don't know why other blacks arn't this way, I'm just better than them!
What's their problem?  Why can't you all be like me, I'm goodlooking
AND black, therefore I have confidence!  What is wrong with all you
other niggers?  Why can't you all be like me?"

See white people DO spend more time outdoors, be it tanning or
whatever.  Maybe they are "sunning".  What do us asians do, study?

You are wrong again.  Yes, glasses do make your eyes look smaller.  But
when you take them off they look very strange, something called "mole
eyes".  You will also notice some permanent damage caused by glasses
making your cornea huge.  Having any type of skin color of melanin
whatsoever automatically makes your eyes look huge.

I'm sorry I can't look into the future and hope for a time machine, I
have myopia.  Myopes do not look into the future, they look into the
past.

I told you why I look angry, the contacts are so strong, that my eyes
have to strain a lot.  Bulging my eyes seems to alleviate the pain
slightly.  Obviously you know nothing about this.  I believe
Lenscrafters has overprescribed me.
youidiota@yahoo.com - 02 Jun 2005 01:01 GMT
That's the problem.  I'm not old.  I'm only 16.  Did you ever read in
To Kill a Mockingbird how the black maid didn't look as old as the
white lawyer?  That's because people with melanin always look old, they
never look youngm while white people pass through the stages of age.
People with skin tone already have the same deformed chins that old
people have.  Again the worst part is that I am very young, but yet my
eyes are 4 times as worse as my teacher who is twice my age.  Young, I
am, in numbers, but physically I have many injuries that only old
people have.
silverblue001@hotmail.com - 02 Jun 2005 02:06 GMT
*Many* people have high myopia.  Stop feeling sorry for yourself.
Things could be a lot worse.
William Stacy - 01 Jun 2005 05:45 GMT
Now maybe you really wrote this, and maybe you didn't.  But if you did...

> If you think about it black people are the ugliest people.  Skin
> complexion represents about 50% of beauty.  The rest is facial
> structure.  Just face it, for some reason dark skin is ugly and looks
> like dirt.

So I was right the first time I read a post from you.  You are nuts.

Crazy.

Lunatic.

Psychotic.

Give it up.  Crawl back into alt.suicide.whatever and stay there.  rot
there.

The rest of you guys on s.m.v.:  stop cross posting to alt.whatever.
You are polluting the environment.  Go back and check all your posts to
this group and see where else your posts have gone.

Yuk.

w.stacy, o.d.
John Yasar - 01 Jun 2005 10:38 GMT
youidiota@yahoo.com wrote:

>> If you think about it black people are the ugliest people.  Skin
>> complexion represents about 50% of beauty.  The rest is facial
>> structure.  Just face it, for some reason dark skin is ugly and looks
>> like dirt.

This is so sad. I am a white guy who has faith in God and I get offended
with racial slurs like this. Even teenagers should not talk like this
unless they have some kind of messed up parents. I feel sorry for you
kid, a lot of black brothers are serving with me FAR FROM their homes
for the country, they might be different, but they are people, next time
you watch a movie like Rush Hour with Chris Tucker in it, or Cosby Show
reruns, slap yourself on the face! Furthermore, cut this crap on
sci.med.vision! I don't want to read it!

Signature

PV2 Yasar, M
U.S. ARMY
AH-64D "Armt Dawg"
A Co/602d ASB/2ID/EUSA - South Korea
Wednesday, 01 Jun 2005 / 18:37:47 Korea S