Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

uveitis explanation - please

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
kemccx@gmail.com - 16 Apr 2005 03:51 GMT
I've been diagnosed with uveitis (as a result of cataract surgery).
I've used pred-forte drops and seem to be healing. My optometrist says
he still sees a few 'cells', indicating I'm not fully healed.  Can
someone explain what these cells are and what it means?
Mike Tyner - 16 Apr 2005 04:27 GMT
> I've been diagnosed with uveitis (as a result of cataract surgery).
> I've used pred-forte drops and seem to be healing. My optometrist says
> he still sees a few 'cells', indicating I'm not fully healed.  Can
> someone explain what these cells are and what it means?

Uveitis is a symptom, though sometimes the cause isn't known.

The iris, and parts of the ciliary body, and parts of the vascular coat
around the eye are so connected that together they have a name, the "uveal
tract".

When parts of this structure get inflamed it's called "uveitis". When it's
just the iris it's called "iritis."

When these structures are inflamed, blood vessels leak protein and the clear
aqueous fluid takes on a haze called "flare". White blood cells also migrate
out of the blood vessels into the aqueous, and in the microscope they can be
seen as tiny white dots floating around in the aqueous.

So "cells and flare" are common signs of uveitis and are often used to guage
your response to treatment, usually with prednisone drops.

Dilating or cycloplegic drops are often used if you're sensitive to light.
Although the wider pupil accepts more light, it doesn't constrict and
therefore light doesn't hurt so much.

-MT, OD
Jane - 16 Apr 2005 14:17 GMT
I have had recurring iritis for years (associated with ankylosing
spondyitis).  It has been come considerably less frequent and less serious
in recent years but I always have drops on hand to treat it when/if it
recurrs.  My experience is I know when it's coming.  My eyeball becomes
tender to the touch.  If I treat it immediately it is a very minor
occurence.  The longer I leave it until I treat it, the longer and more
severe the episode.  The problem I have is if I go to the doctor at this
stage there is no evidence of the problem at all and it always makes me
question my judgement about the "tender" eyeball as an indication.  The
doctor seems seems somewhat skeptical as well.  I'm don't really want to
leave it until it becomes full blown to prove anything but am curious to
know if anyone has had a similar experience.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com>
Newsgroups: sci.med.vision
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: uveitis explanation - please

> <kemccx@gmail.com> wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> -MT, OD
drfrank21@gmail.com - 16 Apr 2005 17:40 GMT
> I've been diagnosed with uveitis (as a result of cataract surgery).
> I've used pred-forte drops and seem to be healing. My optometrist says
> he still sees a few 'cells', indicating I'm not fully healed.  Can
> someone explain what these cells are and what it means?

How far out from your cataract surgery are you?  It is usual and
expected to have an anterior chamber reaction (cells) following cat
surgery(seen in post-op care) and this doesn't indicate a true iritis.

frank
kemccx@gmail.com - 16 Apr 2005 22:10 GMT
Thanks for the reply and followup question -
The surgery was on 12/14/04.  Per my surgeon, I stopped using drops a
month after the surgery.  He said I was completely healed - goodbye -
see you in 3 months.I've since left this doctor due to
non-communicative style. I still felt something was wrong, went to
another ophthalmologist a month later and he found the uveitis and put
me on pred-forte and acuvar (or acular) for 10 days. He said it looked
all clear - and to slowly wean myself off of the drops. This week, i'm
without the drops and will see him again on Monday.  I saw the
optometrist last week, when he saw the 'cells'.  I assume that 4 months
out, I should not still have this complication.   NOTE: I get more out
of this newsgroup than from my own docs!    Karen
drfrank21@gmail.com - 17 Apr 2005 05:48 GMT
> Thanks for the reply and followup question -
> The surgery was on 12/14/04.  Per my surgeon, I stopped using drops a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> out, I should not still have this complication.   NOTE: I get more out
> of this newsgroup than from my own docs!    Karen

Karen, one can have a persistent uveitis after cataract surgery but if
the initial
anterior chamber completely cleared up it's hard to say if this episode
is from the surgery or just co-incidental. If the O.D. just saw a
couple of stray cells
versus a more moderate reaction with flare means there is an
improvement.

Good luck.

frank
David Robins, MD - 20 Apr 2005 05:38 GMT
Most cataract patients have not problems after surgery. I seen them back at
6 week - off the steroid drops for about 2 weeks, and check for uveitis,
among other things. Some do need prolonged treatment.

The second doctor, at least, realizing you weren't acting like the average,
should have seen you back on the drops, later in the taper, to see if all
was quiet. If not, that would have been the time to re-up the treatment.

Note that some eyes do not react well to the foreign body of theimplant in
the eye, and take a long time settling down. A very few never do, and the
implant needs to be removed. Some can stay on a little steroid indefinitely
to keep the iritis under control (ie once a day or so.)

On 4/16/05 2:10 PM, in article
1113685849.807660.67660@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com, "kemccx@gmail.com"

> Thanks for the reply and followup question -
> The surgery was on 12/14/04.  Per my surgeon, I stopped using drops a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> out, I should not still have this complication.   NOTE: I get more out
> of this newsgroup than from my own docs!    Karen
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.