 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Vision / April 200557-year old presbiopic/hypermetropic lady reads diamond type at 10 cm
It took 15 minutes of relaxation but suddenly this lady after wearing for ten years plus lenses for the correction of hypermetropia and presbyopia (in the last five years the lenses were progressive from +3 dioptres) now could read in a well lighted place outdoors the line titled 4) of the Bates book, "seven truths of notmal sight", page 195, at 10 cm from her face. I will post her progress in the next few weeks. http://TheCentralFixation. >It took 15 minutes of relaxation but suddenly this lady after wearing >for ten years plus lenses for the correction of hypermetropia and [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >I will post her progress in the next few weeks. Don't bother, Rishi. There's not a living soul walking this earth who believes you anyway.... > Don't bother, Rishi. There's not a living soul walking this earth who > believes you anyway.... These are true things. I am on this market since three years, and I will go on forever. If this was not possible, the thing should have been dismissed long ago. But don't worry, your business will not suffer. These are things for intelligent people. >> Don't bother, Rishi. There's not a living soul walking this earth >who >> believes you anyway.... > >These are true things. Thank you, but the validity of my statement was really self-evident. >I am on this market since three years, and I will go on forever. I don't really know about that, but it certainly *feels* that way. >If this was not possible, the thing should have been dismissed long >ago. ...and has been... > >If this was not possible, the thing should have been dismissed long > >ago. > > ...and has been... You have dismissed your mind, I'm sorry for you. People are improving and eventually get a permanent cure. Now it is no more a fact of one or two cases, these are dozens now. Some are able to trick a dirty machine like the refractometer. What to do? I dont' ask you to believe. Please, f.ck off. >People are improving and eventually get a permanent cure. > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >What to do? Well . . . you could perform proper, controlled, peer-reviewed studies and have them *published.* This *could* give you *some* measure of much-needed credibility. >I dont' ask you to believe. > >Please, f.ck off. From the country of Dante Alighieri? Disgraceful. Simply disgraceful. > Well . . . you could perform proper, controlled, peer-reviewed studies > and have them *published.* This *could* give you *some* measure of > much-needed credibility. I'm not interested, please get lost, don't be unnecessarily idiotic. she probably never was hypermetropic and many 57 years olds can still accommodate. Why is it so difficult to believe that this is possible? > she probably never was hypermetropic and many 57 years olds can still > accommodate. > > Why is it so difficult to believe that this is possible? Well, she could not see anything for 15 minutes. > many 57 years olds can still > accommodate. wrong! MAYBE they can accommodate about 0.50 diopters, but that is probably doubtful. in full sunlight her pupils were constricted. and in bright light there are sufficient central rays of light entering the eye to make small near print discernable. accommodations had nothing to do with it. oh-- and of course it could just be the typical BS that Rishi likes to post to get attention to his web site where he makes money off of unsuspecting gullible people. Well, that's what happens when you have "Not Male" eyes. >at 10 cm from her face. Gee, a whole FOUR INCHES. I'm blind as a proverbial bat and even I can read small print at 4" without my spectacles... What a contemptible fraud you are. Have the Italian authorities caught you yet? Of course this hypermetropic, presbyopic elderly woman can read in bright sunlight. Did you think to check the size of her pupils? They are undoubtedly pinholes. DrG > What a contemptible fraud you are. Have the Italian authorities caught > you yet? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > DrG I would like to know why you idiot-doctors prescribed to her +3 progressive eyeglasses... Perhaps you are all criminal who sell unnecessary glasses for the gullible? Why then she could not see anything for 15 minutes? > > What a contemptible fraud you are. Have the Italian authorities > caught [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Why then she could not see anything for 15 minutes? I don't know Italian law, but I wouldn't be surprised if you haven't broken a few. Telling people to look at the sun will result in some people being injured. DrG |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.