Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Correcting the vision with high numbers

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Prasad - 16 Mar 2005 20:01 GMT
Hi,
My daughter is 6 years old. She was complaining about not able to
read small letters on board at school. We have taken her to a doctor
and he prescribed to her  lenses with +1.25, +1.5 power. As she was
not able to read the letters on board I was surprised with + power
prescription so we went to another doctor and they prescribed +2.5
-1.5(cyl) , +2.5, -1.25(cyl).  The reason given by the second doctor
is that she is stretching the fibers connecting the lenes to
compensate for the power and she is having astigmatism  so we should
use higher power lenses with the above combination. If we do not use
these lenses the mentioned the fibers will become week and there will
be permanent damage to eye. Is this the only way of correcting this
power ? We are totally confused.

Thanks,
prasad.
g.gatti@agora.it - 16 Mar 2005 20:11 GMT
> use higher power lenses with the above combination. If we do not use
> these lenses the mentioned the fibers will become week and there will
> be permanent damage to eye. Is this the only way of correcting this
> power ? We are totally confused.

Discard the glasses and teach your daughter how to look at thing
without straining, by swinging, and swing her as much as you can, with
a regular rhythm, from side to side, gently.

You see from yourself that these doctors know nothing: the second idiot
doctor doubled or tripled the prescription.

How can there happen these things?

http://TheCentralFixation.com
drfrank21@hotmail.com - 16 Mar 2005 20:37 GMT
Without knowing if either provider did a cycloplegic exam or other
information
it's tough to speculate which rx may be the more accurate one. The
second provider
though - permanent damage to the eye- seems to be overdramatic. Neither
srx
is that high that would cause an amblyopia (lazy eye) situation.

frank
prasadgontla@gmail.com - 17 Mar 2005 17:24 GMT
> Without knowing if either provider did a cycloplegic exam or other
> information
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> frank

I am not sure about the test performed I will get that information. The
second provider was mentioning that the power as he thinks is +5(R),
+6(L). But when such a high power glasses were tried my daughter was
not able to read anything so he is prescribing a lower number to get
adjusted. As I mentioned earlier I donot understand this logic.

Thanks,
Prasad.
g.gatti@agora.it - 17 Mar 2005 18:35 GMT
> adjusted. As I mentioned earlier I donot understand this logic.

There is no logic, any.

Discard the glasses and start the treatment.
Dom - 19 Mar 2005 04:01 GMT
> Hi,
>  My daughter is 6 years old. She was complaining about not able to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Thanks,
> prasad.

When you say the first doctor prescribed "+125, +15" do you mean (1) R
+1.25, L +1.5, or (2) R +1.25 with +1.5cyl, and L the same as the right?

If the answer is (2), then the two prescriptions may not be that different.

Either way, she needs glasses if she is long-sighted by that much. Plus
power can affect distance vision (blackboard) as well as close reading. Can
you clarify the exact prescriptions given by each doctor and post to this
list?

The 'fibers becoming weak' story doesn't make sense, but this doesn't mean
that doctor's prescription is wrong necessarily.

Dom
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.