> I am considering trying contacts again after a 17 year absence from
> them. I am age 60 now. I stopped wearing them when I was in the early
> forties because the single vision was not working any longer.
> because I could wear reading glasses over them to see the desk area and
> computer well and then just take them off when I need to leave the
> desk. Also contacts would work well for golf and some other
> activities.
I wore reading glasses over contacts for many years and was very happy.
> My prescription is:
>
> right: sph -0.50 cyl -1.00 axis 105
> left: sph -4.25 cyl - 0.50 axis 105
> reading: +2.50 for both eyes. The doctor wrote on the prescription to
> Could I get use to contacts after so many years away from them? With
> the above prescription, can I use the bifocal contacts?
I started wearing contacts when I was 45. I found soft lenses to be very
easy to get used to. Experience varies on this. With the big difference
in power, contacts should give you better vision. This is why I went to
contacts. I don't know about bifocal contacts. I understand that they
work for some people but not others.

Signature
Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net
>I am considering trying contacts again after a 17 year absence from
>them. I am age 60 now. I stopped wearing them when I was in the early
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>for computer use). I am thinking that contacts might be good for work
>because I could wear reading glasses over them to see the desk area and
You will, depending on the work distances, probably require either one pair for
reading and another pair for the monitor, or multifocals designed for multiple
work distances. See below.
>computer well and then just take them off when I need to leave the
>desk. Also contacts would work well for golf and some other
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Could I get use to contacts after so many years away from them? With
>the above prescription, can I use the bifocal contacts?
Only way to know is to try them again.
>Would contacts either with bifocal or using reading glasses enable me
>to read better from both eyes at the same time?
Properly designed glasses will usually provide clearer vision than multifocal
contact lenses, the exception being the "translating" design RGPs (rigid gas
permeable) contact lenses. Simultaneous contact lens designs will probably not
provide acceptable vision with a +2.50 add for distance vision, near vision, or
both, especially for prolonged periods of close tasks and/or night driving.
Contact lenses will provide improved stereoscopic vision, a plus for hitting the
ball, but not a concern for those sitting at a desk all day. Well made glasses
should provide sufficient depth perception though.
>Also one question on slab off. I have read on this board in old posts
>that slab off should not be used on PALs. Is this still true? I hear
>different answers on this one from the opticans.
No, PALs can be slabbed. There will be a faint line across the lower half of the
left lens. If you were an avid reader I would consider a slab-off or a separate
pair of readers. However, you said you are having no problems with your present
PALs, except for the head tilt when looking at a monitor. If the new Rx does not
increase the disparity in lens powers then I would probably not slab the lens. A
separate pair of glasses designed just for looking at the monitor and desktop
will provide significantly improved physical and visual comfort. Strongly
recommended.
>Thanks
>Bob
Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
robopt@execpc.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"If a million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."
- Anatole France
> I am considering trying contacts again after a 17 year absence from
> them. I am age 60 now. I stopped wearing them when I was in the early
> forties because the single vision was not working any longer.
What proof do you want more?
Why are you so stubborn?