I am referring to the original Snellen chart I produce,
http://TheCentralFixation.com
If I say 50-line, this means the line of letters calibrated for normal
vision at fifty feet distance.
It is already an objective data.
Read Dr. Bates book.
otisbrown@pa.net - 05 Feb 2005 05:20 GMT
Dear Rishi,
The normal way you state her vision (VA) on the eye chart
is to say she has 20/50 vision.
Or the ability to read 7/8 inch letters at 20 feet.
Truly an amazing change from -20 diopters.
Perhaps we should send a deligation of ODs
over to your place to verify this result.
Congratulations.
Best,
Otis
Engineer
g.gatti@agora.it - 05 Feb 2005 09:30 GMT
Please, read better.
The girl is under treatment, she does not want to be bothered by
idiotic-scientists until she is cured permanently.
This posting is an automatic reply to any sci.med.vision newsgroup thread
that is receiving comments from a person named "Otis", "Otis Brown",
"otisbrown@pa.net" or "Otis, Engineer".
Otis is not an expert in any field of vision. His medical and eyecare
training is nil. He is a proponent of a myopia prevention technique that is
unproven.
In addition, Otis continually misquotes people in his posts. He drops the
names of doctors whom he falsely claims to be associated with. He has been
caught in out-and-out lies. He has given people incorrect medical advise.
Sadly, his behavior suggests he may have psychological problems that compel
him to argue against people just for the sake of causing an argument.
Otis is what is known in internet newsgroup lingo as a "troll". Do not
reply to his postings-- it just takes up bandwidth and storage space that
should be reserved for meaningful topics. It also just fulfils his sick
psychological needs.
No one means to suppress the honest opinions of others. This message is
only meant to forewarn anyone who might misconstrue Otis as a trained
eyecare expert.
For anyone who is interested in understanding the current state of
scientific/medical research on myopia prevention, I offer the following
link: http://annals.edu.sg/pdf200401/V33N1p4.pdf. If you have other topics
you wish to discuss, there are experts here who will usually help you.
Don't waste your time with Otis.
Please see the weekly posting "welcome to sci.med.vision" which usually
appears on Mondays, for information on how to filter out Otis' posts so that
you may be able to participate in worthwhile discussions in this forum.
g.gatti@agora.it - 05 Feb 2005 09:28 GMT
This post is an automatic reply to the idiotic automatic messages this
super idiot named RM publishes regularly on this open forum.
This particularly spicy-ful idiot is against any new method or science
that can help the patient affected by imperfect sight to cure himself
or herself by means of the only method that works, that is REST.
Don't you be bothered by this special idiot.
It is just another specimen of the endless idiots who call themselves
"doctors" but in fact they just destroy people's eyesight and in so
doing, their life.