Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

-20 D myopic prescription under self treatment

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
g.gatti@agora.it - 04 Feb 2005 18:56 GMT
Good news from our client who is treating her imperfect sight  after
having discarded her strong myopic glasses.

Today we managed to read the 50 line of the white Snelln chart at 8
feet, indoors, with a good light pointing on the eyechart.

So the "remote" point is slowly slowly becoming more remote every day
of work.

Other interesting dfevelopments are that the "eccentric fixation2 has
been reduced to half a meter. The original measurement at two meters
distance from the big C of the 200 line gave a value of TWO meters of
eccentric fixation: so the improvement up to now has been of FOUR
TIMES!!!

With the third line (letter P of the Bates' original Snellen chart) of
the 70 feet, the eccentric fixation is reduced to 30 cm.

Please do not reply to this message.
otisbrown@pa.net - 04 Feb 2005 21:03 GMT
Dear Rishi,

Rather that using the "50" line, why not
keep it simple and provide the
SIZE of the letter and the
distance.  The would be
an OBJECTIVE measurement.

Best,

Otis
Engineer
g.gatti@agora.it - 04 Feb 2005 21:54 GMT
I am referring to the original Snellen chart I produce,
http://TheCentralFixation.com

If I say 50-line, this means the line of letters calibrated for normal
vision at fifty feet distance.

It is already an objective data.

Read Dr. Bates book.
otisbrown@pa.net - 05 Feb 2005 05:20 GMT
Dear Rishi,

The normal way you state her vision (VA) on the eye chart
is to say she has 20/50 vision.

Or the ability to read 7/8 inch letters at 20 feet.

Truly an amazing change from -20 diopters.

Perhaps we should send a deligation of ODs
over to your place to verify this result.

Congratulations.

Best,

Otis
Engineer
g.gatti@agora.it - 05 Feb 2005 09:30 GMT
Please, read better.

The girl is under treatment, she does not want to be bothered by
idiotic-scientists until she is cured permanently.
RM - 05 Feb 2005 05:53 GMT
This posting is an automatic reply to any sci.med.vision newsgroup thread
that is receiving comments from a person named "Otis", "Otis Brown",
"otisbrown@pa.net" or "Otis, Engineer".

Otis is not an expert in any field of vision. His medical and eyecare
training is nil.  He is a proponent of a myopia prevention technique that is
unproven.

In addition, Otis continually misquotes people in his posts. He drops the
names of doctors whom he falsely claims to be associated with.  He has been
caught in out-and-out lies. He has given people incorrect medical advise.
Sadly, his behavior suggests he may have psychological problems that compel
him to argue against people just for the sake of causing an argument.

Otis is what is known in internet newsgroup lingo as a "troll".  Do not
reply to his postings-- it just takes up bandwidth and storage space that
should be reserved for meaningful topics.  It also just fulfils his sick
psychological needs.

No one means to suppress the honest opinions of others.  This message is
only meant to forewarn anyone who might misconstrue Otis as a trained
eyecare expert.

For anyone who is interested in understanding the current state of
scientific/medical research on myopia prevention, I offer the following
link: http://annals.edu.sg/pdf200401/V33N1p4.pdf.  If you have other topics
you wish to discuss, there are experts here who will usually help you.
Don't waste your time with Otis.

Please see the weekly posting "welcome to sci.med.vision" which usually
appears on Mondays, for information on how to filter out Otis' posts so that
you may be able to participate in worthwhile discussions in this forum.
g.gatti@agora.it - 05 Feb 2005 09:28 GMT
This post is an automatic reply to the idiotic automatic messages this
super idiot named RM publishes regularly on this open forum.

This particularly spicy-ful idiot is against any new method or science
that can help the patient affected by imperfect sight to cure himself
or herself by means of the only method that works, that is REST.

Don't you be bothered by this special idiot.

It is just another specimen of the endless idiots who call themselves
"doctors" but in fact they just destroy people's eyesight and in so
doing, their life.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.