Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Vision / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

2nd annual: Are shoes a cause of vision problems?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
James Semmel - 18 Jan 2005 16:54 GMT
Hi everyone,

Given the responses it kicked off last year here in the newsgroups, I
would like to annually address the biomechanical effects of shoes on
human degenerative diseases.  Most people still think the idea stinks.
Yet it seems to me that shoes on the feet are like germs on the hands.

Chiropodist Dr. Simon J. Wikler pioneered efforts to understand the
influences of shoes in the 1950's, but his work was neglected during
the subsequent drug-and-diet-based approaches to medicine.  However,
the prolific footwear historian and podiatrist Dr. William A. Rossi
clearly demonstrated throughout his publications that shoes influence
the posture of the human body.  Therefore, coupled with the
posture-based approaches to medicine of the distinguished orthopedist
Dr. Joel E. Goldthwait, I have expanded Dr. Wikler's insightful work to
include a variety of illnesses and conditions whose cause remains
unknown.

Vision problems are just examples of conditions that seem to result
from the habitual use of shoes, particularly during the formative,
childhood years.  It really makes no sense for humans to have four
relatively sharp senses of hearing, feeling, tasting, and smelling, but
an extremely poor-quality fifth one of vision.  Indeed, the
distinguishing factor is that none of the other senses share the
fantastic muscular control necessary for proper organic functioning.
The eye is thus directly subject to unnatural postural strain with
imbalanced feet.  After walking around in shoes for several years--and
it does not take very long at all--the multiple, tiny muscles of a
person's eyes have been subjected to tremendous postural stress.
Faulty body mechanics seems to be responsible for myopia, hyperopia,
astigmatism, presbyopia, strabismus, amblyopia, or other degenerate
conditions, but shoes apparently also influence internal diseases such
as cataracts, macular degeneration, glaucoma, and others.

You may find my thesis on shoes and disease at
http://www.shoebusters.com on the Internet.  My outlined treatment
involves removing the cause; regularly applying a contrast bath--or
more descriptively, an alternate cold-hot footbath--to maintain
flexibility in the feet; barefoot walking to maintain strength in the
feet, resorting to wide-toed, soft-soled moccasins if necessary; and
getting plenty of rest.

Depending on age, footwear habits, and daily demands, a 20-minute daily
walk, supplemented by a 20-minute contrast footbath every third or
fourth day (about twice a week), could actually be sufficient to
control or prevent many common conditions, but the regimen should be
used as the foundation for any other therapy, which may provide further
relief of symptoms if necessary.

Thank you very much for any questions, discussion, or feetback.
the barefoot loafer,
  James Semmel
g.gatti@agora.it - 18 Jan 2005 18:36 GMT
people cures its imperfect sight while wearing shoes by means of reast
methods, but I understand the value of barefoot walking, or at least a
good large shoe that does not prevent the feet to move inside.

barefoot walking is an important part of the HM phenomenon, which
addresses also vision problems (http://www.solarhealing.com)
retinula@hotmail.com - 18 Jan 2005 20:34 GMT
2nd annual freak convention:
Held in Amsterdam, Netherlands on April 1st 2005  All sungazers,
podoptometrists, engineers, and scam artists invited.  Otis Brown and
Rishi are featured speakers.

---------

g.ga...@agora.it wrote:
> people cures its imperfect sight while wearing shoes by means of reast
> methods, but I understand the value of barefoot walking, or at least a
> good large shoe that does not prevent the feet to move inside.
>
> barefoot walking is an important part of the HM phenomenon, which
> addresses also vision problems (http://www.solarhealing.com)
- 18 Jan 2005 20:49 GMT
> 2nd annual freak convention:
> Held in Amsterdam, Netherlands on April 1st 2005  All sungazers,
> podoptometrists, engineers, and scam artists invited.  Otis Brown and
> Rishi are featured speakers.

Sonesta ?

Signature

Free to  Marcus Porcius Cato: ''Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"

In conclusion, I think that the "Otis therapy" should be destroyed

Jan (normally Dutch spoken)

otisbrown@pa.net - 18 Jan 2005 20:51 GMT
Dear Friend,

Subject:  Those who "object" to "traditional" treatments.

It has been the history of medicine that any one who
"objects" to the "standard treatment" must be
wrong by definition.  This has been the
tragic blindness to advocacy for "change" even
within the profession.  Dr. Bates felt the "sting"
of that type response -- and ANYONE who
discusses "problem" with the minus-lens
method put is place 400 years ago -- will
recerive similar "treatment".

Indeed even Ignaz Seimelweis -- who
advocated WASHING YOUR HANDS
before deliveriung babys -- received
incredible anger from his fellow MDs.

So your blind and poorly informed response
is undertood.

Today there are ODs who are now supporting
a perons's right to be informed of the preventive
method by use of the plus.  Indeed a professor
of optometry, Theodore Grosvenor has stated
EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

But it is very clear that you ears and
mind are "stopped up" to anything
you don't like.

Best,

Otis
Engineer
RM - 19 Jan 2005 00:10 GMT
This posting is an automatic reply to any sci.med.vision newsgroup thread
that is receiving comments from a person named "Otis", "Otis Brown",
"otisbrown@pa.net" or "Otis, Engineer".

Otis is not an expert in any field of vision. His medical and eyecare
training is nil.  He is a proponent of a myopia prevention technique that is
unproven and in many aspects has been specifically disproven by controlled
scientific studies.

In addition, Otis continually misquotes people in his posts. He drops the
names of doctors whom he falsely claims to be associated with.  He has been
caught in out-and-out lies. He has given people incorrect medical advise.
Sadly, his behavior suggests he may have psychological problems that compell
him to argue against people just for the sake of causing an argument.

Otis is what is known in internet newsgroup lingo as a "troll".  Do not
reply to his postings-- it just takes up bandwidth and storage space that
should be reserved for meaningful topics.  It also just fulfils his sick
psychological needs.

No one means to suppress the honest opinions of others.  This message is
only meant to forewarn anyone who might misconstrue Otis as a trained
eyecare expert.

For anyone who is interested in understanding the current state of
scientific/medical research on myopia prevention, I offer the following
link: http://annals.edu.sg/pdf200401/V33N1p4.pdf.  If you have other topics
you wish to discuss, there are experts here who will usually help you.
Don't was your time with Otis.

Please see the weekly posting "welcome to sci.med.vision" which usually
appears on Mondays, for information on how to filter out Otis' posts so that
you may be able to participate in worthwhile discussions in this forum.
g.gatti@agora.it - 18 Jan 2005 22:05 GMT
HRM phenomenon

sorry for the typo
Joe Stella - 19 Jan 2005 01:18 GMT
>Given the responses it kicked off last year here in the newsgroups, I
>would like to annually address the biomechanical effects of shoes on
>human degenerative diseases.  Most people still think the idea stinks.
>Yet it seems to me that shoes on the feet are like germs on the hands.

Isn't this post a bit early?  April 1 is still a couple of months
away...
- 19 Jan 2005 07:42 GMT
> Isn't this post a bit early?  April 1 is still a couple of months
> away...

No.

BTW, it's in the Sonesta "koepel'', an old building with a dome-shaped roof
with in top of it a room designed for plus wearing sungazers.

Signature

Free to  Marcus Porcius Cato: ''Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam"

In conclusion, I think that the "Otis therapy" should be destroyed

Jan (normally Dutch spoken)

andreas106 - 19 Jan 2005 18:05 GMT
Hi, James,
i'm working every day with a specialist for posture
(3D-Podo-Aethiology) we look on functional interactions and strategic
crossovers between the feet, vision, hearing, plan of occlusion (teeth)
and so on, i'm glad to see that many people around the world are
thinking and working on similar themes.
Funtional interactions between eyes and posture are investigated,
described and confirmed since the early 20th century, e.g.
"Körperstellung" (Body-Posture), by R. Magnus, 1924.
Let me use the words of some australian colleagues: "The lack of a
universal definition of propioception is problematic and has possibly
hampered progress in this area of research." That meets the point.
Shoes may cause vision problems as well as inadequate plans of
occlusion and many other factors. By overusing compensatory mechanisms
for several years every single factor may cause structural damage. In
my opinion ist's always useful to look on feet, shoes and posture and
not very useful to treat vision problems without a look on the rest of
the body. Inappropriate corrective glasses may fix injurious posture as
well as wrong shoes may lead to injurious occlusal plans and even
maintain organic and systemic problems.
Therefore i'm always glad when specialists from various disciplines
work on congruent solutions.
Regards, Andreas Million (dentistry, orthodontics), Germany
drmillion@operamail.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.