Otis Brown Log: 16 January

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

LarryDoc - 17 Jan 2005 07:51 GMT

Another slow day for Otis Brown this day featuring only 3 posts, all to
himself or at least an effort to move out of his corner. There was
concern yesterday that perhaps he's been ill. Certainly he is not too
ill to type.

Of course even his few posts do include the usual indefensible drivel
and nonsense. Actually, the very same sentences he's used countless
times on a daily basis for over two years. Clearly, no one cares
anymore.

Reply to this Message

otisbrown@pa.net - 17 Jan 2005 21:11 GMT

Dear Larry,

Hello! Sorry for the delay in my posts concerning
the PREVENTION of nearsightedness.

I was talking to Dr. Francis Young about his
study (Oakley-Young) and his results
versus the "Houston" bifocal study.

He said that he was on a sebatical, but
had little involvement with the "Houston"
study -- and DID NOT AGREE WITH THE RESULTS.

So the Oakley-Young study -- demonstrating
the effective-prevention is possible and
feasable is still a scientific reality.
But enjoy my friend.

Best,

Otis

Reply to this Message

RM - 18 Jan 2005 00:29 GMT

> I was talking to Dr. Francis Young about his
> study (Oakley-Young) and his results
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> feasable is still a scientific reality.
> But enjoy my friend.

Let me understand.

So because someone who has a differing opinion with the results of a
scientific study doesn't agree with that study, then it's not valid.
Right? Is that what you are saying?

Sounds like bias to me Otis. But we already know that Otis=bias (as well as
Otis=misquoting, Otis=liar).

Reply to this Message