Some people claim their myopia gets better as they age. Is this true? If so,
will Lasik to plano result in hyperopia later on?
Dr Judy - 15 Jan 2005 17:35 GMT
> Some people claim their myopia gets better as they age. Is this true?
Some people become less myopic in their forties due to relaxation of the
ciliary muscle, usually by less than 1D. Some get more myopic due to
increase in density of the lens. Some don't change.
>If so, will Lasik to plano result in hyperopia later on?
If they were in the group becoming less myopic, yes.
Dr Judy
Andrew Chew - 16 Jan 2005 02:03 GMT
>> Some people claim their myopia gets better as they age. Is this true?
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Dr Judy
Thanks. Seems my aunt had her vision improve in one eye by 2D(-5D to -3D).
RM - 17 Jan 2005 13:28 GMT
perhaps she had been previously overminused in that eye when she was
younger. Happens a lot.
>>> Some people claim their myopia gets better as they age. Is this true?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Thanks. Seems my aunt had her vision improve in one eye by 2D(-5D to -3D).
Mike Tyner - 15 Jan 2005 19:09 GMT
> Some people claim their myopia gets better as they age. Is this true?
About half of them, but it's usually only a half-diopter or so. Non-myopes
experience the same shift, and in hyperopes sometimes it's a dramatic
change.
> If so, will Lasik to plano result in hyperopia later on?
You betcha. Still, plano is what most want, and expect. This is one of the
good reasons to target -0.50 or -0.75 as an endpoint. The other is
that -0.50 makes presbyopia much less annoying.
-MT
Robert Martellaro - 17 Jan 2005 18:08 GMT
>Some people claim their myopia gets better as they age. Is this true? If so,
>will Lasik to plano result in hyperopia later on?
It's called "hyperopic shift".
http://www.optometrists.asn.au/gui/files/ceo826236.pdf
Hope this helps
Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
robopt@execpc.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself."
- Richard Feynman
Andrew Chew - 18 Jan 2005 13:11 GMT
> It's called "hyperopic shift".
>
> http://www.optometrists.asn.au/gui/files/ceo826236.pdf
>
> Hope this helps
Thanks, it's very useful. Guess that rules out lasik for me since it seems
myopia in my family regresses by large amounts in the presbyopic years and
I'm already in my mid-30s.
My current -2.25 & -3.00 would probably end up as -0.25 & -1.00.
g.gatti@agora.it - 18 Jan 2005 20:13 GMT
I have witnessed 40 years old ex -3 D myopic who have cured their
distant vision and can read microscopic print (1/3 mm) at 20 cm
distance.
retinula@hotmail.com - 19 Jan 2005 03:27 GMT
g.ga...@agora.it wrote:
> I have witnessed 40 years old ex -3 D myopic who have cured their
> distant vision and can read microscopic print (1/3 mm) at 20 cm
> distance.
Well if you were a -3D myope you could see at 20 cm pretty well. Wow
you're a genius.
kemccx@gmail.com - 24 Jan 2005 02:52 GMT
what if someone has had cataract surgery ? Does the eye still continue
to change as one gets older? Or does the set focal point remain at the
orignal length?
RM - 24 Jan 2005 04:56 GMT
There is much less change after cataract surgery. However, it does happen.
------
> what if someone has had cataract surgery ? Does the eye still continue
> to change as one gets older? Or does the set focal point remain at the
> orignal length?
Dr Judy - 26 Jan 2005 01:30 GMT
> what if someone has had cataract surgery ? Does the eye still continue
> to change as one gets older? Or does the set focal point remain at the
> orignal length?
Since the lens is the source of much of the variation in refractive error
over time in adults, those who have had cataract surgery (ie no longer have
their lens) tend to have very little future change. It does happen, but is
unusual.
Dr Judy
g.gatti@agora.it - 26 Jan 2005 12:07 GMT
> Since the lens is the source of much of the variation in refractive error
> over time in adults, those who have had cataract surgery (ie no longer have
> their lens) tend to have very little future change. It does happen, but is
> unusual.
Please EXPLAIN HOW IT CAN HAPPEN IN SUCH UNUSUAL CASES.
g.gatti@agora.it - 24 Jan 2005 09:47 GMT
Yes but he sees 20/10 without glasses now.
I see you are a perfect genius.