g.ga...@agora.it wrote:
> You do not know how to relieve sufferings, answer to this man pains if
> you can.
>
> Give him an answer why his doctor blundered.
Dear Rishi,
Subject: RM's arrogance
You are right.
No one answered the question about due care and
concern about the fact that the man should have
been informed of potential adverse consequences
of these drugs. Instead they attack me
for even mentioning the necessity of
informed consent. And you tell me they
are not arrogant?
This man has the potential to file a lawsuit
based on the failure to provide this
information to him.
Best,
Otis
Engineer
RM - 11 Jan 2005 22:31 GMT
>> Give him an answer why his doctor blundered.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> based on the failure to provide this
> information to him.
That's the answer-- sue somebody! If you only understood even a little bit
about cyclopentolate and how the eye works you would realize what a fool you
would make of yourself if you tried such a stunt.
Of course I wouldn't like filing a law suit against an eye doctor-- because
I am part of the "conspiracy of eye doctors" (by the way guys, our next
meeting is scheduled in Bermuda on March 12th).
Otis, you are too ignorant of the way the eye works, and the way topical
medications such as cyclopentolate work, to know anything about this issue.
I hope you value your close relationship with Rishi the Italian nutcase
because he's the only one in this newsgroup who gives any credibility to
your opinions. I, for one, think your postings are a potential heath hazard
to innocent patients and that you should be stopped.
g.gatti@agora.it - 12 Jan 2005 11:56 GMT
> Otis, you are too ignorant of the way the eye works, and the way topical
> medications such as cyclopentolate work, to know anything about this issue.
> I hope you value your close relationship with Rishi the Italian nutcase
> because he's the only one in this newsgroup who gives any credibility to
> your opinions. I, for one, think your postings are a potential heath hazard
> to innocent patients and that you should be stopped.
Please Mr. Idiot,
answer why your patient had the eyesight destroyed by following with
care your standards of treatment.
You idiot.
retinula@hotmail.com - 13 Jan 2005 03:08 GMT
you must be the Italian idiot that RM refered to.
How can anyone tell what the cause of the reduced vision is for this
patient-- there is insufficient information. Without examining him
myself I would imagine his problem stems from his original problem--
iritis. He needs to see a good eye doctor and ask these questions.
What would you recommend-- sungazing and leeches?
Dr. Leukoma - 12 Jan 2005 02:16 GMT
First of all, "Brown," the use of a mydriatic and a steroid is the
"standard of care" in the treatment of anterior uveitis. There is no
need for an "informed consent agreement" here. Secondly, there is no
evidence that the mydriatic is the cause of this man's problem,
inasmuch as the exact nature of the problem has not been disclosed.
Now, go back and try to cure your myopia.
DrG
> g.ga...@agora.it wrote:
> > You do not know how to relieve sufferings, answer to this man pains
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Otis
> Engineer
retinula@hotmail.com - 12 Jan 2005 02:42 GMT
there was no wrong-doing on the part of the eye doctor here. The
treatment he received is routine and no "informed consent" is required.
The patient is likely suffering from further consequences of his
iritis and the eye drops he received has nothing to do with it.
otisbrown apparently has some axes to grind against eye care
professionals. He likewise has a weak understanding of routine eye
care.