> > Anybody out there here of a situation where a person only needed glasses
> > for
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I agree that the relationship with myopia is likely a coincidence.
No scientific answer, then.
> Blood sugar variations can cause significant myopia but it is transient,
> usually resolving after the blood sugar is controlled. Surely they've tested
> for that.
What happens, the eye elongates and then resumes its former shape?
> The most common reason for permanent myopic shift at age 57 is a change in
> the crystalline lens that occurs preceding cataract. It might not be visible
> in the examination, or may only appear as a mild yellowing in the lens. It
> can still take years for a significant cataract to form.
20/450 is indeed an high myopia, though.
It should be interesting to treat this person with rest methods and
see what would happen since your science has no answer.
Perhaps is just a mental defiance.