Hi.

Even if your reasoning is the classical sheep thinking (remember that
the best discoveries in human evolution were made by people that
were doubting established thinking) I will gladly address your
points.

1) You put faith in people that prescribe you glasses so that other
people sell them to you. Then glasses make your naked eye ability to
see worse generating the need of new visits to the first kind of
people
that will prescribe you new glasses. The net result of this is that
your vision get worse and your wallet get empty.

2) These unfair businessmen don't give a f**k about your health and
more than that they don't give a f**k about science and human
evolution but they cunningly use the established authority to bashing
any new discovery. Why don't they investigate the discoveries about
human eyes made by Bates trying to reproduce his experiments to see
if they are factual ? Why they wait for evidence then discard it as
anedoctical ? A true scientist investigates the SINGLE fact that
doesn't fit in his theory (there are many in eye and vision related
disease frequently witnessed by those unfair businessmen) to
discover why the theory is not describing what really happens.

3) There are lots of people that are benefited by NOT using glasses
or that are cured by the methods of the natural eye that are smashed
by the unfair businessmen because if no glasses are needed then
no business could go on and no more authority on their part. In fact
if someone proves that they are wrong (as it is) the whole
establishment will fall apart, so they are the least people to be
expected to prove or accept that. Searching for approvement from
them is simply foolish, so there will never be controlled clinical
trials from those people and they will never recognize them to
be scientific. That's the power of authority.

4) You are right about snakeoil books because the unfair
businessmen did a very smart thing: instead of completely hide the
original publications of the discoverer of the cure of imperfect sight
by treatment without glasses (thing that was and is not possible)
they did a very cunning thing: they crippled it, and (after the
original scientist died) they let it spread without important pieces.
Was it a whole world conspiracy thing ? I think not, but it was
and is not in their interest to investigate and spread the truth so
nobody cared to check it out.

5) The word-of-mouth thing is true. The problem in vision cure
is that superstition is strong in people: one of the key element in
the cure of imperfect sight by treatment without glasses is the use
of the strong light of the sun. Especially for people that wore
glasses it is indispensable to get accustomed to strong light.
This has to be done to the point that when there is strong light
you are not in the least bothered by it, so that there is absolutely
no strain or thought of strain. (A lot of people with normal or
more than normal sight find absolutely non-problematic to look
at the sun, they even enjoy doing it). Now, there is a great fear
and superstition about these unfavorable conditions. The discoverer
of the methods was an MD and people followed (due to the same
authority principle that now hiders the spreading of the truth)
his instructions even when he advised them to do the various
forms of sun treatment. Nowadays only very few people do the
original treatment that includes using the sun glass, learning to
look at the sun, etc. Guess what ? Those people are getting
results! And not mild ones ! Among intelligent people the word
is spreading very rapidly.

6) Why intelligent people are needed to the methods to work ?
Simple: the cause of imperfect sight is the wrong idea about
the use of the eyes. People with imperfect sight think that to do
something better (to see better in this case) an effort is needed.
The methods aim at make the patients UNDERSTAND that their
imperfect vision is due to them wanting to clear up things with
an effort staring at the point they are looking at and trying to
see all at the same time like a camera on film. The eye is different
from the film in this respect because while the film is equally
sensitive in all its area, the retina has a little spot that is more
sensitive than the rest, so it follow that one can see only one
point (the one he is looking at) best and the rest not so clear.
To have an image of the field of vision, the brain takes hints of
it by shifting the point of fixation and IMAGINING the rest.
(There are NO PIXELS in the brain !). It then follows that
improving one imagination one improves the vision. And this
is the other important aspect of the methods that is usually
neglected by the so called "practitioners" or "teachers".
How could you imagine something ? Remembering it! Because
one could imagine only something that he saw. The fundamental
principle of the cure of imperfect sight by treatment without
glasses is exactly this. Practicing with familiar objects (usually
letters of a test card) looking at them, closing the eyes and
remembering them trying to imagine them without effort.
When one learns how to do this the smaller letters clear up
because he strain less to see the bigger ones all at once.

Hope this helps to clear things.

Evaristo.


--
"It is not faith that cures, but a proper use of the eyes."