Anyone disagree with this?

Eye Movements
So far, the relation of the movements of the eyes to the requirements
of the visual apparatus and their control have been touched upon. To
examine the character of the movements in some detail requires rapid,
accurate measurement of the movements that the eyes undergo. Modern
studies of this subject employ a contact lens fitting on to the globe;
on the lens is a small plane mirror, and a parallel bundle of rays is
reflected off this mirror onto a moving film.
By the use of refined methods of measuring the position of the eyes at
any moment, it becomes immediately evident that the eyes are never
stationary for more than a fraction of a second; the movements are of
three types: (1) irregular movements of high frequency (30-70 per
second) and small excursions of about 20 seconds of arc; (2) flicks, or
saccades, of several minutes of arc occurring at regular intervals of
about one second; and between these saccades there occur (3) slow
irregular drifts extending up to six minutes of arc. The saccades are
corrective, serving to bring the fixation axis on the point of regard
after this has drifted away from it too far, and thus are a
manifestation of the fixation reflex.
The significance of these small movements during fixation was revealed
by studies on the stabilized retinal image: by a suitable optical
device the image of an object could be held stationary on the retina in
spite of the movements of the eye. It was found that under these
conditions the image would disappear within a few seconds. Thus, the
movements of the eye are apparently necessary to allow the contours of
the image to fall on a new set of rods and cones at repeated intervals;
if this does not occur, the retina adapts to their stimulus and ceases
to send messages to the central nervous system. The small flicks
mentioned above are essentially the same as the larger movement made
when the two eyes fixate (fix on) a light when it suddenly appears in
the peripheral field; this is given the general name of the saccade, to
distinguish it from the slower movements occurring during convergence
and smooth following. The dynamics of the saccade have been studied in
some detail by several workers. There is a reaction time of about 120
to 180 milliseconds, after which both eyes move simultaneously; there
is a definite overshoot and, with an excursion of 20°, the operation
is completed in about 90 milliseconds. The maximum velocity increases
with the extent of the movement, being 300° per second for 10° and
500° per second for 30°. A remarkable feature is the apparent absence
of significant inertia in the eyeball, so that movement is halted, not
by any checking action of antagonistic muscles but simply by cessation
of contraction of the agonists; thus, the movement is not ballistic.
Once under way, the saccade is determined in amount, so that the
subject cannot voluntarily alter its direction and extent. The control
mechanism for the saccadic type of movement can be described as a
sampled data system, i.e., the brain makes discontinuous samples of the
position of the eyes in relation to the target and corrects the error,
in contrast to a continuous feedback system that takes account of the
error all the time.
The movements of the eyes when they converge onto a near object are in
remarkable contrast to the saccade; the angular velocity is only about
25° per second, compared with values as high as 500° per second in
the saccade. The great difference in speed suggested to two
investigators that the two movements are executed by different muscle
fibres. In fact, the extraocular muscles do contain two types of muscle
fibre with characteristically different nerve supplies, and some recent
studies tend to support this view of a dual mechanism.
If a moving light suddenly appears in the field of view, and if its
rate of movement is less than about 30° per second, the response of
the eyes is remarkably efficient; a saccade brings the eyes on target,
and they follow the motion at almost exactly the same angular velocity
as that of the target; inaccuracies in following lead to corrective
saccades. When the rate of movement of the target is greater than about
30° per second, these corrective saccades become more obvious because
now smooth following is not possible; the eyes make constant-velocity
movements, but the velocity rarely matches that of the moving target,
so that there must be frequent corrective saccades. Studies have shown
that the following movements are highly integrated and must involve a
continuous feedback system whereby errors are used to modify the
performance. Thus, the systems for control of saccades and tracking
movements are fundamentally different.
Robin Parsons

In fact, Aldous Huxley was not treated by Batesm, who was long dead,
but by such infamous false disciples like Corbett et al, who destroied
the whole Bates legacy.

We are trying to rebuild it starting again from scratch.

Our website is http://TheCentralFixation.com

No I stated that I am genetically myopic, or at least before laser surgery.
Only an idiot would imply someone else to be an idiot save for simply
disagreeing.
That's when I get really suspicious of someone's assertions on a particular
topic.

We went through this hair-brained stuff in the 60's. Waste of time. In my
own particular case I could not exercise my eyesight to be any different
than I could exercise my way up to 6'5". Just ain't gonna happen.