> > > So far i have not got improvements in eyeball vision, but for sure it
> > > is very very interesting to observe these patterns in people and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Such a funny guy
Andrew,
Indeed he is.
You are a strange funny guy.
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
andrew Judd - 23 Jun 2004 15:11 GMT
> > "Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:<4f0Cc.10060$bs4.3088@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Indeed he is.
> You are a strange funny guy.
Jan as this is claimed to be a scientific board can you explain what
is strange about me?
Please be as scientific as you can please
Thanks
Andrew
Jan - 23 Jun 2004 19:13 GMT
> > > "Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:<4f0Cc.10060$bs4.3088@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Jan as this is claimed to be a scientific board can you explain what
> is strange about me?
My answer to you is as scientific as possible and based on your
scientificaly qualification of Mike Turner.
> Please be as scientific as you can please
I was, as you are.
> Thanks
>
> Andrew
You are welcome
Jan (normally Dutch spoken)
>MT> Then you'd love phrenology
> Such a funny guy
No, it isn't funny at all.
If personality dictates the shape of the eyeball, or vice versa, it's
reasonable to think that bumps on the head could also, or freckles in the
iris. Personality might even depend on the position of the stars and
planets, or a repeating 12-year cycle.
-MT
Scott Seidman - 23 Jun 2004 22:19 GMT
"Mike Tyner" <mtyner@mindspring.com> wrote in news:I6lCc.11090$bs4.9355
@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:
> Personality might even depend on the position of the stars and
> planets, or a repeating 12-year cycle.
>
> -MT
Probably a repeating 100 year cycle, and we only get to see the first 85
years or so :-)
Scott
andrew Judd - 24 Jun 2004 10:01 GMT
> >MT> Then you'd love phrenology
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> iris. Personality might even depend on the position of the stars and
> planets, or a repeating 12-year cycle.
I can show so far is that if you patch the eye of a person being
interviewed, they respond differently depending on which eye is
patched, they find this interesting, and are able to adjust their
opposing viewpoints, relatively easily.
Also I am finding that people with myopia and astigmatism express
noticably opposing viewpoints while being patched. Often they become
emotional, or find that one eyes 'experience' is preferred to the
other.
So this does not dictate anything. But is surely a subject that is
worth investigating further.
Dr. Leukoma - 24 Jun 2004 13:13 GMT
>> >MT> Then you'd love phrenology
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> So this does not dictate anything. But is surely a subject that is
> worth investigating further.
I would find having one eye patched to be an irritating experience, to say
the least.
DrG