Thanks to Dr. G for his response:
> Thanks to Dr. G for his response:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Actually, the PDR includes "spasm of accommodation" as an adverse
> effect. Evidently it blocks impulse transmiission at the synapses.
Spasm of accommodation, which can be painful, typically results from over-
use of accommodation. I know of at least one documented case where Elavil
relieved accommodative spasm. But, that's not your problem, is it? Your
problem is that Elavil has impaired your ability to accommodate, right?
DrG
Rustler - 27 Jun 2004 01:56 GMT
DrG wrote:
>Spasm of accommodation, which can be painful, typically results from over-
>use of accommodation. I know of at least one documented case where Elavil
>relieved accommodative spasm. But, that's not your problem, is it? Your
>problem is that Elavil has impaired your ability to accommodate, right?<
I can't say 100% that Elavil impaired my accommodation, however the problem
didn't come up until several days after starting the drug, and that was the
only change I am aware of in my routine.
I can see that Elavil might relieve a spasm in the muscle controlling the lens
as it evidently interferes with nerve impulses being transmitted--in fact, it
would seem quite likely that such would be the case. If that's what's
happening, then a person would assume that normal impulses for pulling on the
lens to see close objects could also be blocked. So both of these points appear
to demonstrate similar action.