> We have an interesting situation at a large company in the southeast.
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> Thanks for any information.
I know sharpness and video cards matter. Some sections here use dual
monitors, also, with special video cards. An additional monitor AND
video card will cost about the same as a replacement 22" monitor.
What I am after is some sort of relationship between productivity and
monitor size, assuming a given sharpness.
The eye docs have told me the further away from the monitor the eye
is, the less the myopia-inducing strain on the lense. If I get more
than two feet from a 17" screen loaded up with Framemaker stuff, I
can't read it anymore. Two feet is still too close for a small enough
myopia-inducing strain.
I need much larger font sizes, which is not a possibility now. Larger
fonts need larger screens for a given amount of material presented.
Larger fonts will let me get 3' away from the screen, maybe.
There is a reduction in productivity when CVS sets in. The morale
factor alone is significant, knowing I am ruining my eyes permanently.
There has got to be some study somewhere that shows a relationship
between productivity and monitor size. Maybe the relationship might
not be quite so direct,... it might be nothing more than a
relationship between productivity and CVS.
Anyway, anyone out there with some ideas, please let me know.
"Mark A" <ma@switchboard.net> wrote >
> The sharpness of the monitor is just as important (if not more so) than the
> size. Also the video card (and the refresh rate used) has a significant
> impact on CVS.>
> Many newer video cards will support multiple monitors so you can put each
> document on a separate screen.
Mark A - 26 May 2004 23:27 GMT
> I know sharpness and video cards matter. Some sections here use dual
> monitors, also, with special video cards. An additional monitor AND
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Anyway, anyone out there with some ideas, please let me know.
All productivity "studies" are bogus. It's not science, it's common sense.
Dan Abel - 27 May 2004 00:21 GMT
> All productivity "studies" are bogus. It's not science, it's common sense.
I have my favorite productivity study that I studied in a management class
that I took many years back. It's not completely off topic, since it
attempted to measure productivity changes due to changing light levels.
It was a plant that assembled telepone equipment, so it was easy to
measure how many got assembled during a given time period. The study
found that productivity increased, when light levels were increased,
decreased or left the same! They attempted to figure out why, and found
that the job was so mind-numbingly boring that the fact that somebody was
paying some attention to the workers made them feel better enough about
their jobs that they became more productive.
I think the problem with any productivity study done concerning larger
monitors, is that such work is almost impossible to measure. In fact, I
would guess that for some jobs where it was possible to measure
productivity changes, a small monitor that showed just what the worker
needed to see would be more productive than a large monitor which
interfered with the space available for other equipment.

Signature
Dan Abel
Sonoma State University
AIS
dabel@sonic.net
Lew - 27 May 2004 15:58 GMT
"Mark A" wrote: "All productivity "studies" are bogus. It's not
science, it's common sense."
Of course it is common sense. So what!? You aren't getting the Dr's
point.
I can directly relate to his problem. Where I work common sense
doesn't mean diddly when it comes to costs and funding. All that
matters is that the purse-string-pullers see some sort of cost
advantage. It is part of their religion -- they must see a savings or
less time spent or increased revenue. If they don't see a near term
quantifiable improvement, they won't spend any money.
I don't have any productivity numbers. Sorry. There is, however, a
growing understanding of CVS and how it affects the bottom line.
Maybe the accountants might get motivated if they saw huge healthcare
expenses associated with UV, posture, and vision problems from working
with lousy monitors.