> I have no doubt that the standard way to get glasses is
>better, but I am now living in a situation where I can
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>> >
>> > ??? In your experience, do they really call?
Unlikely.
>> > One, in the USA, does not want the Dr's name.
>> >
>> > ??? Is this because his state does not require it?
>> >
>> > I heard that Penn. is such a state. True??
They're probably just being honest.
>> > Does anyone know which states are which on this
>> > point?
>> >
>> > ??? Does anyone here think much of mail-order glasses?
You will not cause any permanent damage to your eyes if you are not an
adolescent. Your blood pressure might max out though.
>> > Somehow I doubt it.
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>> >
>> > Jack
Jack,
Suggestion. Have an optician fit you with a frame that is appropriate for your
Rx. Buy two identical frames. Both frames should be pre-adjusted with
calculations performed for optimal lens placement. Alternate Rx changes between
frames so that you are never without a reasonably functional pair of glasses.
Pay the regular price for the first pair, but demand reduced fees for subsequent
Rx changes, especially if they are occurring frequently as you have stated. Your
optician will get the Rx from your doctor, and you can mail the glasses to your
optician. They will be careful not to upset the frame fit (which may degrade the
vision) and will send you the glasses when the lens work is completed.
Hope this helps
Robert Martellaro
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Optician/Owner
Roberts Optical
robopt@execpc.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself."
- Richard Feynman