Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Arthritis / July 2008
NICE
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Andy - 22 Jul 2008 11:14 GMT http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7513484.stm
discuss
Walt - 22 Jul 2008 12:42 GMT > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7513484.stm > > discuss It is utter nonesense - for all the reasons cited in the article. There is no way to tell in advance how someone will respond to a drug and all of these drugs lose effectiveness over time. It is another example of short-term thinking that will result in long-term pain and added costs. I certainly hope that you folks in Great Britain can kill this "guidance" before it kills you.
Walt Hanks
tony sayer - 22 Jul 2008 13:05 GMT In article <444a6ef8-92d7-4d7b-8db7-ffe31c759e85@c58g2000hsc.googlegroup s.com>, Walt <walt.hanks@verizon.net> scribeth thus
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7513484.stm >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Walt Hanks Course if the NICE people who made those decisions were afflicted with Arthur they'd soon change their minds, but I suppose their Six figure salaries enable them to pay for that privately:(............
 Signature Tony Sayer
Smokie Darling (Annie) - 22 Jul 2008 13:19 GMT > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7513484.stm > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Walt Hanks and then what happens when someone (like me) is allergic to Rituximab? I got weeping hives, it was awful, because they all got infected. Granted, I've already tried all the biologics, but what happens to someone in my position? Are they SOL?
Harvey R. Stone - 22 Jul 2008 17:17 GMT > It is utter nonesense - for all the reasons cited in the article. > There is no way to tell in advance how someone will respond to a drug [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Walt Hanks and then what happens when someone (like me) is allergic to Rituximab? I got weeping hives, it was awful, because they all got infected. Granted, I've already tried all the biologics, but what happens to someone in my position? Are they SOL?
I had a hive reaction to Remicae but nooo weeeeping,,, thank goodness.
Harv
Kelly - 22 Jul 2008 19:12 GMT I can't remember Annie - have you tried orencia?
Kelly
On Jul 22, 5:42 am, Walt <walt.ha...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On Jul 22, 6:14 am, Andy<americauk00nos...@gmail.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Walt Hanks and then what happens when someone (like me) is allergic to Rituximab? I got weeping hives, it was awful, because they all got infected. Granted, I've already tried all the biologics, but what happens to someone in my position? Are they SOL?
Peter - 23 Jul 2008 16:05 GMT > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7513484.stm > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Walt Hanks No doubt about it, many of the Decisions made by NICE are controversial to say the least. The title is National Institute for Clinical Excellence, but as far as I can see one its main functions is to limit government expenditure on expensive drugs. This is done on the grounds that they are considered to be ineffective in some way, or not effective enough. Couple this to the fact that there is a post code lottery for drugs like anti tnf inhibitors, even when NICE has approved them and you get a picture of inconsistency in the supply and allocation of these drugs in the UK.
Socialised medicine (the NHS) does not mean universally excellent free medicine, although many Brits don't suffer the sort of expense you people have in the U.S. Part of the trouble is the socialist doctrine upon which the NHS was founded. For instance, if you are prepared to pay for a drug which the NHS won't supply, they are likely to turn round and say that they will not treat you for the disease at all and you will have to pay for everything. (because of an outcry and the total injustice of preventing people from saving their own lives, I think that this has now been rescinded.
Anyway, NICE is wrong and inhuman to prevent those with severe RA from having a try at a second anti tnf inhibitor, just because they failed the first. If these people qualified for the drug in the first place (after trying all the other dmards) the expense has already been approved, so it costs no more if they are put on another anti tnf. Hence penny pinching.
Sorry about the winge, but I fired up whe I think there is an injustice.
Best wishes to all
Peter
Andy - 23 Jul 2008 11:45 GMT >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7513484.stm > >discuss Ping Ruth Arnold....come back 19 December 2001 "I've also sent a Press Release about the site to ARC, Rheumatologyweb, about.com, rheumatology.org.uk, arhtritiscare.org.uk and the BBC.
I've reproduced it below. Can any of you give me some ideas about who else I could send it to?
Some press, radio or TV coverage would be good wouldn't it.
Thanks!
ruth arnold spacehoppa.com www.nicecampaign.co.uk
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ----------------------------------------------------------------- New website launched to campaign for new anti-TNF drugs to be made available to arthritis sufferers in the UK, http://www.nicecampaign.org.uk -----------------------------------------------------------------
A new website has been launched this week to collect positive personal stories of arthritis sufferers who are using new anti-TNF drugs.
The web site's purpose is to provide compelling reasons why NICE should approve the drugs Enbrel* and Remicade* (also known as Etanercept and Infliximab) for general use on the NHS in the United Kingdom.
The organisers of www.nicecampaign.org.uk want to achieve this by creating a sort of online, electronically-stored petition. Most of the people who currently have access to these drugs are in America so, via the internet support groups: alt.support.arthritis and uk.people.support.arthritis on Usenet, those people already taking the drugs have been asked for their opinions on whether or not these new drugs are worthwhile.
The final results will be sent to NICE in time for their final committee meeting on 15th January 2002. This will be their final meeting before announcing their decision whether to allow the new anti-TNF drugs to be made available via the NHS.
For more information or to add your comments visit the site at: http://www.nicecampaign.org.uk
##
(*Footnote: If you want more information about the new anti-TNF drugs go to the excellent web pages of drdoc (Dr David Gotlieb) at http://www.arthritis.co.za to find out more.)
Contact:
Ruth Arnold - the website organiser - can be contacted at: r...@spacehoppa.com or by telephoning: 01270 766001.
----------------------------------------------------------------- More information: -----------------------------------------------------------------
About the site organiser...
Ruth Arnold, the organiser of www.nicecampaign.org.uk has had rheumatoid arthritis since the age of 15. Now 28 years old, she has steadily been working her way through all the conventional treatments - diclofenac, sulphasalazine, methotrexate and chloroquine, but nothing has ever brought the disease fully under control.
Like millions of arthritis sufferers around the world, she has a fairly aggressive form of the disease. She has joint contractures, joint erosion and restricted range of movement in many of her joints. Enbrel, Remicade and other drugs like it are looking increasingly necessary for Ruth and other sufferers who, like her, are running out of other options.
In Ruth's opinion, if NICE chooses to make these drugs available, they should be offered not just to people who have already failed several drugs but should also be available to those people for whom the joint destruction is only just beginning. She says "If NICE make the right decision now, we could save generations to come a lifetime of difficulty and pain.".
About NICE.
NICE is an organisation in the UK whose responsibility it is to advise both the government and Local Health Authorities on which drugs and medical equipment should be provided free at the point of delivery on the National Health Service.
It's remit states that: "It is part of the National Health Service (NHS), and its role is to provide patients, health professionals and the public with authoritative, robust and reliable guidance on current "best practice"."
The upshot is, if NICE approve these drugs, they should become available nationwide to those patients that qualify as suitable candidates. At the moment hardly anyone in the UK has access to these drugs.
When will NICE's decision be made?
NICE have agreed to come to their final decision by March 2002. They have a final committee meeting on this matter scheduled for the 15th January 2002. Go to http://www.nice.org.uk/cat.asp?c=20323 on the web to read more about it on the NICE web site."
UPSA posting stats from Google groups Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2000 21 75 457 433 2001 577 498 481 242 467 521 686 533 720 703 597 601 2002 551 834 1223 770 692 544 559 586 576 339 319 239 2003 358 192 526 319 279 330 150 307 386 325 270 261 2004 254 345 226 209 131 188 73 111 281 220 217 170 2005 89 134 127 105 70 87 95 74 16 64 39 39 2006 125 93 50 31 39 27 21 13 42 41 71 33 2007 29 6 51 47 52 57 86 69 71 72 126 66 2008 32 8 115 73 40 26 20
Nann Bell - 25 Jul 2008 13:28 GMT > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7513484.stm > > discuss My first impression is that NICE needs at least one, preferably several people on the board with stubborn inflammatory arthritis!
And I agree whole-heartedly with Abagail Page's quote "It is short-sighted and pernicious that NICE can look only at cost to the NHS, not at total cost to the taxpayer in terms of benefits and social care. It is rationing without rationality.
"When will the government do the maths and see that treating someone is often far cheaper than not treating them?"
I hope you all are effective in preventing the implementation of this exceedingly foolish recommendation!
(oh and why is the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence abbreviated NICE rather than NIHCE? It certainly isn't *nice* in this instance!
 Signature Nann remove the Gator cheer to email me Change everything. Love & forgive.
|
|
|