> One answer, from someone you don't know, have never met, and you are ready
> to kill a doctor?
Maybe you missed the smiley at the end of the sentence. As I'm sure most
people will apreciate dealing with a clueless doctor is frustrating at
best. I may well be blunt and tell someone what I think of them but even
I'm not stupid enough to carry out such an act and end up in prison.
> Getting a second opinion is valid, but involves going to the right person
> for that advice.
>
> Why not let a few more folks respond before you form your own opinion,
> assuming that you have not already decided what to believe and are only
> seeking someone to co-sign your BS.
This isn't the first place I've sought an opinion, which in all fairness
maybe I should have said, I just need as much information as possible to
put my case.
> The person who answered you could very well be totally qualified, it is not
> my intention of being disrespectful.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>>
>> Thanks again.
ENTconsult - 10 May 2004 17:16 GMT
Wow that was quick. Thank you, come Monday morning I'm going to be
>> throwing a certain doctor out of a first floor window head first. :-)
>> My impressions of him are correct, clueless.
on the contrary I believe it was you who misunderstood what your doctor said.
Your doctor is correct in saying when he looks into your ear canal that he
doesn't SEE evidence of inner ear infection - no pus pouring out. But Tinnitus
is not necessarily an infection.
In various studies they have shown that patients rarely remember more than 30%
of what the doctor said and why it is necessary to write everything down. No
reflection on the patient - its just that people are human.
Murray Grossan, M.D.
http://www.ent-consult.com