There is no shortage of studies on tinnitus and for that matter on
many other illnesses.  But despite the availability of intellectual
knowledge, on both sides of an argument,  of any particular subject,
one in the final analysis still has to resort to action in order to
take care of what keeps bothering himself.

Then how can we decide whether or not we should go ahead with a
suggested treatment?. The method is simple and is related to what the
policy makers in the government use.  Namely, it is a method that
makes use of the theory of 'reversable or irreversable consequences'.

If a government policy will likely produce irreversable consquences,
policy makers have to put this policy aside for further studies.  On
the other hand, if the consequences from a certain policy are clearly
reversible, then this policy should be implemented right away.

When it comes to deciding on whether one should try GB in order to see
if it can relieve one's tinnitus through improving the blood
circulation in one's brain, all it takes is to make sure that the
consequences from taking GB are reversible.

In my opinion, trying GB for _a couple of weeks_, a month at the
most,  under the guidance of an experienced pharmacist, will unlikely
produce irreversible consequences, but the benefits will be enormous
if it happens to 'bingo' on you...

FP