> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> > well-designed study including 1,121 people with tinnitus found that ginkgo
> > (given 3 times daily for 3 months) was *no more effective than placebo
in
> > relieving symptoms of tinnitus. Given these conflicting findings, the
> > therapeutic value of ginkgo for tinnitus remains uncertain. In general,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Susan
Very true, in fact I still take it on occasion (maybe psychological
suggestive response) but no real change for me.
*"No better than placebo", suggests that any relief must be very rare at
best, and probably psychological if any.
Jamffer
Susan - 11 Nov 2007 18:31 GMT
> *"No better than placebo", suggests that any relief must be very rare at
> best, and probably psychological if any.
Rare, yes, but if you're the rare beneficiary, who cares?
The placebo effect does not exist in the way you're referring to it, and
Ginkgo has strong physiological effects, so that's a rather foolish
assertion.
T has many causes and GB may just treat one of the rarer ones, who knows?
Susan
Ghamph - 11 Nov 2007 18:57 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Susan
Of course you have a better way to test, than placebo control study of over
1000 suffers.
Maybe show me your evidence. (study)
The placebo effect is the same in the study as Ginkgo (probably natural
variance) if not suggestive.
You foolish, narrow minded vitamin hawk.
If it worked for me I would be broadcasting it loudly on this group.
Since there's not a lot of people claiming GB is a panacea lets agree that
relief is rare.
That assertion is not foolish but proven.
Susan - 11 Nov 2007 19:35 GMT
>>x-no-archive: yes
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> That assertion is not foolish but proven.
Wow, stupid AND uncivil.
Not an auspicious combination.
Susan
Ghamph - 11 Nov 2007 20:07 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Susan
You must be ugly on the outside too.