Tinnitus to me is a symptom but not a cause of an illness. So why do
all that statements suggest this or that treatment/med is effective/
ineffective for tinnitus? If the statements were modified in such a
way as to suggest that this or that treatment/med is effective/
ineffective for XYZ or ABC cause of tinnitus, the statements would
have made more sense.
So would I be right when I suggest that Treatment 1 is more effective
for the 'nerve' typed cause of tinnitus than say Treatment 2?
On Oct 16, 12:41 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tinnitus to me is a symptom but not a cause of an illness. So why do
> all that statements suggest this or that treatment/med is effective/
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> So would I be right when I suggest that Treatment 1 is more effective
> for the 'nerve' typed cause of tinnitus than say Treatment 2?
The causal forces behind Tinnitus are what one should first
rectify. Then one should cope with the effectuals...the discomfort,
or the psychosomatic. I chose to bring a determined petitioning to
Congress and the public...and found agreement with Citizen's
Commission for Human Rights International,( www.ccchr.org) and many
others that find Congress, because of a supply and demand economy has
avoided the moral laws long enough.
The truth will show...we co-exist with too many foreign external
causals of many diseases...that humans should never be subjected
to...and money is not a good reason to kill someone...A slow death is
liken a slow poisoning...or premeditated murder.