 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Tinnitus / September 2003O/T Murray...a Nazi type question
Murray, You asked why no one stood up against the Nazi goons. How about I give you a real time example. Never before in history has the complexion and culture of a country been taken over with a war. It hasn't happened - not once single time. Now, you live in CA, correct? How's that immigration problem working for you? I've contacted all my representatives. None of them care about who comes over the border. A lot of people I know have done the same thing. But the republican party no longer exists and the democrat party is the party of Stalin, Marx, and Lenin. They are socialists that look at the illegals as votes. Rather than round them up and dump them on the other side of the Rio Grande the democrats try to register them to drive and then they can vote. And that piece of filth named Clinton that rivals other pieces of filth is doing something not seen; at least in modern times. He is on the campaign trail berating a sitting president in a time of war. Why? Because Hillary sat there and took it so she could make a vie at the presidency. If and when that happens we will cease to be a nation because we have no real Supreme Court when a Ruth Bader Ginzberg references other nation's rulings to rationalize a sick ruling. Nazis, Visigoths, Vandals, Clinton's, Democrats, doesn't matter. What's in a name when they are destroying the country and your way of life? Now, a lot of people want to stop them. We can do nothing. No one cares to hear. We are ruled by oligarchs. And if I die as the last angry man over it then so be it. No Murray, I'm not your enemy. Your anger is misdirected. You know damn well that your advertizing here is improper. And you know why you selected to do it as you do and so do I. Martin Aquinas - I God damn know I'm right. >Never before in history has the complexion and culture of a >country been taken over with a war. That should read "without a war." Martin Aquinas > Murray, > > You asked why no one stood up against the Nazi goons. How about > I give you a real time example. Real examples our lil' OCD Sock? Try your very own Brother Troll "Gym Bob". The fact that you keep silent over his Nazi anti-Semitism, and in fact team up with him for attacks on ast displays you are nothing but a tin horn and a hypocrite. But then, "Martin", you have never put your money where your mouth is on this newsgroup, so we expect no more from you. But then he's your pal for bullying on ast, which we do recognize is much more important to you and is pretty much all that you really have going in life. Below are some of his priceless gems just from ast. You should do an all groups Google search on "Gym Bob" & "jewish". From: Gym Bob (NonAtAll@nospam.com) Subject: Re: Niacin and Porky Pig) OK...who is gonna make it all bye-byes and say "sorry" first? You know the Jewish apologee? The Catholics have confession for this. I think I am in need of a good vet. From: Gym Bob (NonAtAll@nospam.com) Subject: Re: (O/T) I started a file You forgot to give the Jewish confesion From: Gym Bob (NonAtAll@nospam.com) Subject: Re: Rumors Homosexuals? None of them are f.cking Jews! From: Gym Bob (NoThanx@notspam.com) Subject: Re: I thought this was a tinnitus support group.... Help? I guess that is a matter of opinion! From Gym Bob just this week: I gave a kid some candy once. Does that mean I can hurt everybody else and I am forgiven? I do not actively participate in the jewish faith and therefore I do not subscribe to that crap. >I do not actively participate in the jewish faith So Gym Bob is Jewish. Now, when was I required to stand up and fight other's battles? Do I approve of some of the things said here? No, I don't. Am I Judge Judy? No, not her either. I'm sure you think I'm in direct contact with people over this and I'm someone who writes "countless letters and makes countless phone calls" - you are wrong. Martin Aquinas You don't consider yourself to be Judge Judy? You are the quintessential Judge Judy. Do you have so little insight into what you write here? Martin, c'mon. That statement is 180 degrees out of phase with reality. Howard N. Gutnick > Now, when was I required to stand up and fight other's battles? Do I > approve of some of the things said here? No, I don't. Am I Judge Judy? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Martin Aquinas >You are the quintessential >Judge Judy. I like to think of myself as an anthropologist, actually. Martin Meade - unearthing things people tried to bury Martin <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> wrote: >So Gym Bob is Jewish. No OCD Boy. Read my post again. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic. Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of your troll tagteam? Personally, I despise Nazis. Here is my post again: > > Murray, > > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > am forgiven? I do not actively participate in the jewish faith and therefore > I do not subscribe to that crap. >Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of >your troll tagteam? Sorry but there will be no Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. You made a charge you prove it. >>Personally, I despise Nazis.<< I'll go you one further. Not only do I despise Nazi's, many of their wishes are alive and well in the democrat party. I despise their leadership and I despise the ACLU. It is ultra-American to feel that way. Can you say the same? Martin Lincoln - where did my party go? > >Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of > >your troll tagteam? > > Sorry but there will be no Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. You made a > charge you prove it. What charge? >> >Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of >> >your troll tagteam? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >What charge? Can't you read? Try looking above in your question. Martin Aquinas > >> >Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of > >> >your troll tagteam? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Martin Aquinas You read it. Go back to the post. The question is for you about your man Gym Bob. What is your answer? "your man"? What do you have against homesexual people, other than your mouth? > The question is for you about your man Gym Bob. > What is your answer? ^"your man"? What do you have against homesexual people, other than your ^mouth? Does this mean that you are now identifying yourself as homosexual, "Gym Bob?" You are aware that the phrase "your man" is not always interpreted sexually, aren't you? Methinks you doth protest too much! ^ ^"Ian Cessant" <ocd_r_us@yahoo.com> wrote in message ^news:24d46d6d.0309182115.58a07631@posting.google.com... ^> The question is for you about your man Gym Bob. ^> What is your answer? ^ > "your man"? What do you have against homesexual people, other than your > mouth? So what's a "homesexual"? Someone with a low-income housing fetish? Martinnnnn, Terri-llilly, it's for yoouu... [sig heil, Scumbag] >So what's a "homesexual"? It's pretty clearly defined. It used to be considered a disorder. Now, up is down and down is up and it's "just another lifestyle choice" and one that demands to tell you repeatedly that they want more rights than others. Martin Aquinas I love when they go "up and down". > >So what's a "homesexual"? > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Martin Aquinas > I love when they go "up and down". So does your boyfriend. ok SWEET CHEEKS. Do you always refer to yourself in the third party context? And I thought we were going to keep "us" a secret. > > I love when they go "up and down". > > So does your boyfriend. > ok SWEET CHEEKS. Do you always refer to yourself in the third party > context? > > And I thought we were going to keep "us" a secret. mo of homus. >[sig heil, Scumbag] Did you know that many of the early Nazi party were homosexuals? Is that why you raise your right arm? Martin Aquinas >You read it. Go back to the post. >The question is for you about your man Gym Bob. >What is your answer? The question is [as you wrote Ian] : >Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of > >> >your troll tagteam? The question is beneath my dignity to answer. Why have you never once spoke out against the ACLU and there defense of NAMBLA? Or do you support NAMBLA given the SC's ruling on sodomy? What is your answer? Better yet, why does Muzzy stir the pot and you say nothing about his unwillingness to answer direct questions when he himself raised the issue? ANS: Because Muzzy often picks his insults without thought to his ability [or lack of] to back them up. Martin Dredd ^On 18 Sep 2003 22:15:33 -0700, ocd_r_us@yahoo.com (Ian Cessant) wrote: ^ ^>You read it. Go back to the post. ^>The question is for you about your man Gym Bob. ^>What is your answer? ^ ^The question is [as you wrote Ian] : ^ ^>Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of ^> >> >your troll tagteam? ^ ^The question is beneath my dignity to answer. Sorry, Martin, but we don't have time to dig into the earth to determine what might be at the level of your dignity. Just answer the question. ^ ^Why have you never once spoke out against the ACLU and there defense ^of NAMBLA? Who gives a rat's a.s? What has it got to do with the behavior of your alter ego, "Gym Bob?" ^ Or do you support NAMBLA given the SC's ruling on sodomy? Who gives a rat's a.s? Answer the question about your shadow, "Gym Bob?" ^What is your answer? My answer id that you are a coward, too frightened to give a direct answer to a direct question about your, I mean "Gym Bob's," posts, instead of trying to misdirect us onto a stupid tangent about your favorite organization, NAMBLA (which may be your other hobby besides Nagler)? Neither the ACLU, the Supreme Court, or even NAMBLA have offered commentary on anything on this news group, but your reabsorbed twin, "Gym Bob," has. What say you about what "Gym Bob" said? ^ <snip rest> >Who gives a rat's a.s? Answer the question about your shadow, "Gym >Bob?" > >^What is your answer? I would direct you to my previous answer as to your inquiry. You might need help. Ask a neighbor Martin Aquinas ^On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 03:33:10 GMT, Abel Aravidze <abelarav@net.com> ^wrote: ^ ^>Who gives a rat's a.s? Answer the question about your shadow, "Gym ^>Bob?" ^> ^>^What is your answer? ^ ^I would direct you to my previous answer as to your inquiry. You might ^need help. Ask a neighbor I would direct you to the original question as to your alleged "answer." You definitely need help. Ask a psychiatrist, or consult your inner child, "Gym Bob." ^ ^Martin Aquinas YOU are so good with the personal insults. Did you ever think of seeking employment using your talent? > ^On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 03:33:10 GMT, Abel Aravidze <abelarav@net.com> > ^wrote: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > ^ > ^Martin Aquinas ^YOU are so good with the personal insults. ^ ^Did you ever think of seeking employment using your talent? Did you ever think of seeking employment at all? I know a shopping mall that is looking for a new speed bump. ^ ^"Abel Aravidze" <abelarav@com.net> wrote in message ^news:cttomv0pgfl9t2vmbnb1jub7gtpj9ard6i@4ax.com... ^> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:16:55 -0400, Martin ^> <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> wrote: ^> ^> ^On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 03:33:10 GMT, Abel Aravidze <abelarav@net.com> ^> ^wrote: ^> ^ ^> ^>Who gives a rat's a.s? Answer the question about your shadow, "Gym ^> ^>Bob?" ^> ^> ^> ^>^What is your answer? ^> ^ ^> ^I would direct you to my previous answer as to your inquiry. You might ^> ^need help. Ask a neighbor ^> ^> I would direct you to the original question as to your alleged ^> "answer." You definitely need help. Ask a psychiatrist, or consult ^> your inner child, "Gym Bob." ^> ^> ^ ^> ^Martin Aquinas ^> ^ "alter ego"? You just had to bring religion back into the argument now, didn't you? First it was sexual preference and now religious persecution and above all things yet, sodomy. When will it ever stop? > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:42:54 -0400, Martin > Who gives a rat's a.s? What has it got to do with the behavior of your > alter ego, "Gym Bob?" > > ^ Or do you support NAMBLA given the SC's ruling on sodomy? > "alter ego"? > > You just had to bring religion back into the argument now, didn't you? > > First it was sexual preference and now religious persecution and above all > things yet, sodomy. When will it ever stop? When you dump your boyfriend. ^"alter ego"? ^ ^You just had to bring religion back into the argument now, didn't you? Are you really this stupid, or do you just play a moron on usenet? "Altar" is the elevated structure in a house of worship; "alter" simply means alternative. Hint: puns work better in oral rather than written conversation. ^ ^First it was sexual preference and now religious persecution and above all ^things yet, sodomy. When will it ever stop? ^ ^"Abel Aravidze" <abelarav@net.com> wrote in message ^news:8shnmvse90dtii0dej374p8tivjqskjsk0@4ax.com... ^> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:42:54 -0400, Martin ^> Who gives a rat's a.s? What has it got to do with the behavior of your ^> alter ego, "Gym Bob?" ^> ^> ^ Or do you support NAMBLA given the SC's ruling on sodomy? ^> ^ I didn't think I would have to explain it to you. Now I am not too sure. You seem to underatnd the pundle but complain it doesn't make sense to you??? Oh I get it now. You are a moron! > ^"alter ego"? > ^ [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > ^> > ^ ^I didn't think I would have to explain it to you. Now I am not too sure. You ^seem to underatnd the pundle but complain it doesn't make sense to you??? Exactly where did I complain that it didn't make sense, or show that I didn't get it?? ^ ^Oh I get it now. You are a moron! Oh, I get it now. You are an illiterate, ^ ^"Abel Aravidze" <abelarav@com.net> wrote in message ^news:ujvqmvcgesc3ihu44vtj69qrq3t12uhag3@4ax.com... ^> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 13:16:12 GMT, "Gym Bob" <NoThanx@notspam.com> ^> wrote: ^> ^> ^"alter ego"? ^> ^ ^> ^You just had to bring religion back into the argument now, didn't you? ^> ^> Are you really this stupid, or do you just play a moron on usenet? ^> "Altar" is the elevated structure in a house of worship; "alter" ^> simply means alternative. Hint: puns work better in oral rather than ^> written conversation. ^> ^> ^ ^> ^First it was sexual preference and now religious persecution and above ^all ^> ^things yet, sodomy. When will it ever stop? ^> ^ ^> ^"Abel Aravidze" <abelarav@net.com> wrote in message ^> ^news:8shnmvse90dtii0dej374p8tivjqskjsk0@4ax.com... ^> ^> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:42:54 -0400, Martin ^> ^> Who gives a rat's a.s? What has it got to do with the behavior of your ^> ^> alter ego, "Gym Bob?" ^> ^> ^> ^> ^ Or do you support NAMBLA given the SC's ruling on sodomy? ^> ^> ^> ^ ^> ^ "Abel Aravidze" <abelarav@net.com> wrote in message Or do you support NAMBLA given the SC's ruling on sodomy? First it was Jim Chinnis and the child molesting stuff, then midgets from Harvard then sodomy...... now NAMBLA. What is the preoccupation with pedophilia? Is there a connection between pedophilia and Tinnitus? Michael, are you a silent member of this group? Hello.... gloved one... what's your twenty? Come-back? ^"Abel Aravidze" <abelarav@net.com> wrote in message ^Or do you support NAMBLA given the SC's ruling on sodomy? ^ ^First it was Jim Chinnis and the child molesting stuff, then midgets from ^Harvard then sodomy...... now NAMBLA. What is the preoccupation with ^pedophilia? Is there a connection between pedophilia and Tinnitus? Michael, ^are you a silent member of this group? Hello.... gloved one... what's your ^twenty? Come-back? ^ Excuse me, but go back and read what I wrote more carefully. You will see that any of the "child molesting" talk was Martin's, not mine. What you have posted above as a quote from me is in fact a quote from Martin. Try again. Relax and loosen your socks, they're too tight.... I wasn't targeting you. I was talking about overall. > ^"Abel Aravidze" <abelarav@net.com> wrote in message > ^Or do you support NAMBLA given the SC's ruling on sodomy? [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > What you have posted above as a quote from me is in fact a quote from > Martin. Try again. > ^On 18 Sep 2003 22:15:33 -0700, ocd_r_us@yahoo.com (Ian Cessant) wrote: > ^ [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Who gives a rat's a.s? What has it got to do with the behavior of your > alter ego, "Gym Bob?" The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack members of the newsgroup. Martin preaches against Nazis and yet works with and supports them in this newsgroup. If Osama Bin Laden himself came on this newsgroup to attack the health care workers here, dug up old posts and quotes fron battles past and used them out of context, Martin would embrace him and praise him. You're a hypocrite, Martin. An empty tinhorn. Your hypocracy is always clearly at your side for all to see like a big ugly dog. FINALLY! Somebody noticed some of our multi-talents. What are you doing after all the action big boy? -- > You're a hypocrite, Martin. An empty tinhorn. Your > hypocracy is always clearly at your side for all > to see like a big ugly dog. ^FINALLY! Somebody noticed some of our multi-talents. ^ ^What are you doing after all the action big boy? I'm not familiar with all the, errr, ins and outs of gay culture, but isn't it usually the "bottom" who uses phrases like "big boy" in his sexual come-ons? ^Abel Aravidze <abelarav@net.com> wrote in message news:<8shnmvse90dtii0dej374p8tivjqskjsk0@4ax.com>... ^> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 22:42:54 -0400, Martin ^> <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> wrote: ^> ^> ^ ^> ^>You read it. Go back to the post. ^> ^>The question is for you about your man Gym Bob. ^> ^>What is your answer? ^> ^ ^> ^The question is [as you wrote Ian] : ^> ^ ^> ^>Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of ^> ^> >> >your troll tagteam? ^> ^ ^> ^The question is beneath my dignity to answer. ^> ^> Sorry, Martin, but we don't have time to dig into the earth to ^> determine what might be at the level of your dignity. Just answer the ^> question. ^> ^> ^ ^> ^Why have you never once spoke out against the ACLU and there defense ^> ^of NAMBLA? ^> ^> Who gives a rat's a.s? What has it got to do with the behavior of your ^> alter ego, "Gym Bob?" ^> ^ ^The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and ^Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack ^members of the newsgroup. It's worse than that -- "Gym Bob" IS Martin, and I can demonstrate it, if you wish. Martin puts words into the mouth of his sock puppet, "Gym Bob," whenever he doesn't want to be directly associated with those words. ^Martin preaches against Nazis and yet works with and ^supports them in this newsgroup. Martin doesn't preach against Nazis at all -- he just uses the word as an insult against anyone who is to the left of Strom Thurmond or Jesse Helms -- when he's not calling everyone a Communist, that is. Words mean nothing to Martin. Reading Martin's writings is like listening to AM talk radio -- you never remember what was said an hour later, but if you listen to it exclusively, and in a drowsy state, you might actually wind up believing what you hear. ^If Osama Bin Laden himself came on this newsgroup to ^attack the health care workers here, dug up old posts ^and quotes fron battles past and used them out of context, ^Martin would embrace him and praise him. And Terri would praise Osama's posts while she was on "vacation!" ^ ^You're a hypocrite, Martin. An empty tinhorn. Your ^hypocracy is always clearly at your side for all ^to see like a big ugly dog. And the big ugly dog is named "Gym Bob" -- the only question is who is holding the leash. Abel Aravidze says:- > ^Abel Aravidze wrote... > ^> martinsock wrote: > ^> ^>You read it. Go back to the post. > ^> ^>The question is for you about your man Gym Bob. > ^> ^>What is your answer? > ^> ^The question is [as you wrote Ian] : > ^> ^>Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of > ^> ^>your troll tagteam? > ^> ^The question is beneath my dignity to answer. aint that a gem?! > ^> Sorry, Martin, but we don't have time to dig into the earth to > ^> determine what might be at the level of your dignity. Just answer the > ^> question. > ^> ^Why have you never once spoke out against the ACLU and there defense > ^> ^of NAMBLA? > ^> Who gives a rat's a.s? What has it got to do with the behavior of your > ^> alter ego, "Gym Bob?" > ^The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and > ^Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack > ^members of the newsgroup. > It's worse than that -- "Gym Bob" IS Martin, and I can demonstrate it, > if you wish. Martin puts words into the mouth of his sock puppet, "Gym > Bob," whenever he doesn't want to be directly associated with those > words. yeah look at the timings & relationships to martinsock postings the 'style' the grammar & the punctuation come through as well & he always dodges the question the antisemitism is martinsock copying simpson imo tho i wouldnt put it beyond one of *his* multi-talents along with the homophobia & the sexual perversion refs > ^Martin preaches against Nazis and yet works with and > ^supports them in this newsgroup. > Martin doesn't preach against Nazis at all -- he just uses the word as > an insult against anyone who is to the left of Strom Thurmond or Jesse [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > if you listen to it exclusively, and in a drowsy state, you might > actually wind up believing what you hear. look at his boobie posts & then at his as martin & ask whether this man has anything of value to say its all insult & exhibitionism from his second hand shockjock opinions to his anti-nagler & grossan crapola > ^If Osama Bin Laden himself came on this newsgroup to > ^attack the health care workers here, dug up old posts > ^and quotes fron battles past and used them out of context, > ^Martin would embrace him and praise him. > And Terri would praise Osama's posts while she was on "vacation!" no tellin what a woman with a grudge wouldnt do :\ > ^You're a hypocrite, Martin. An empty tinhorn. Your > ^hypocracy is always clearly at your side for all > ^to see like a big ugly dog. > And the big ugly dog is named "Gym Bob" -- the only question is who is > holding the leash. conlon? LOL!!! Cheers hic >yeah look at the timings & relationships to martinsock postings >the 'style' the grammar & the punctuation come through as well [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >it beyond one of *his* multi-talents along with the homophobia & the >sexual perversion refs Would someone please tell me who I am? This changing from week to week is making me dizzy. How about this for starters. Am I male or female? I need to know what you girls think...HA! Martin Aquinas P.S. Yoli knows who I am, but he doesn't post here anymore. Besides, I doubt if you could beat it out of him. >>yeah look at the timings & relationships to martinsock postings >>the 'style' the grammar & the punctuation come through as well [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >P.S. Yoli knows who I am, but he doesn't post here anymore. Besides, I >doubt if you could beat it out of him. They must create this confusion because they don't want everyone to realize that there are simply a lot of people that have figured out Nagler and his crew, not just "one or two" as they would like everyone to believe. Terri http://pub219.ezboard.com/btinnitusactivismandsupport da towel ("No one cares what you think") rushes to the aid of her fellow truffler:- > They must create this confusion because they don't want everyone to > realize that there are simply a lot of people that have figured out > Nagler and his crew, not just "one or two" as they would like everyone > to believe. nah towel - this not about nagler its about martinsock antisemitism & his failure 2 answer teh question u 'lot of people' is da yoliar martinsock & u in various sox hth > http://pub219.ezboard.com/btinnitusactivismandsupport http://pub219a.ezboard.com/helpllillywithhergrudge LOL!!! Cheers hic > da towel ("No one cares what you think") rushes to the aid of her fellow truffler:- > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Cheers hic For that matter she is a tagteam member with Martin and Gym Bob. She will stay silent about Gym Bob's anti-Semitic attacks as well since they are targeted against those who oppose her obsessions with Nagler and keeping this newsgroup trashed. I have nothing against any f.cking jews. > > da towel ("No one cares what you think") rushes to the aid of her fellow truffler:- > > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > since they are targeted against those who oppose her obsessions > with Nagler and keeping this newsgroup trashed. > >>yeah look at the timings & relationships to martinsock postings > >>the 'style' the grammar & the punctuation come through as well [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > http://pub219.ezboard.com/btinnitusactivismandsupport oh oh change the subject to Nagler oh oh change the subject to Nagler change the subject to Nagler oh oh attack Nagler now oh oh Nagler attacks will stop it oh oh martinsock ("I'm not reading all messages") gets to the heart of the question:- > Would someone please tell me who I am? ask da towel shes teh expert in that department - could pin u down 2 an exact continent lol > This changing from week to week is making me dizzy. spinnin fro teh get go > How about this for starters. Am I male or female? unambiguously mouth & trousers > I need to know what you girls think...HA! gonna cuse us o lesbehanisme next? lol > P.S. Yoli knows who I am, but he doesn't post here anymore. some1 p0stin crapola fro near orlando who could it b? > Besides, I doubt if you could beat it out of him. full o it - like u now about teh antisemitism & how u & u boobie always dodges teh question?? LOL!!! Cheers hic > martinsock ("I'm not reading all messages") gets to the heart of the question:- Isn't that something? In pretty much every one of Martin's responses to me the last couple of days he has either misquoted me entirely, answers questions that I never asked in leu of the question I did ask, or attempts to change the topic. Sometimes the changes he makes in quotes of my wording are subtle but do change the meaning of my points to make it appear that I'm saying or asking something else. It seems to be the only way that he can defend his appalling actions and positions. For example teaming up with an anti-Senmitic to attack the people of this newsgroup, and flooding the newsgroup with headers of hatred and distortions. I do know that people with ocd will do that to objects that they perceive as barriers to their obsessions. It causes them to miss information and therefore to fail to comprehend. Stop being Jewish if you don't like it. I did. > > martinsock ("I'm not reading all messages") gets to the heart of the question:- > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > they perceive as barriers to their obsessions. It causes them to > miss information and therefore to fail to comprehend. >For example teaming up with an anti-Senmitic to >attack the people of this newsgroup, and flooding the newsgroup >with headers of hatred and distortions. Just because you state it does not mean it is true. You can't post a single anti-Semitic word I have written. That pretty much sums up how pathetic your words are. Now, stop supporting the heinous actions of the ACLU against Christians by your silence. Getting it yet? Martin Aquinas Ian Cessant wrote trenchantly:- > martinsock watch wrote... > > martinsock ("I'm not reading all messages") gets to the heart of the question:- > Isn't that something? In pretty much every one of Martin's responses > to me the last couple of days he has either misquoted me entirely, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > attack the people of this newsgroup, and flooding the newsgroup > with headers of hatred and distortions. Yup that's been martinsocks MO from the outset - lie distort and insult and then twist and dodge when called on it he thinks he's clever - ha! but he's not clever enough to see that we are not impressed by his conceits (the self advertizin & the second-hand third-rate opinions) still less by teh boobie behind the deceit ("I don't know who GymBob is") > I do know that people with ocd will do that to objects that > they perceive as barriers to their obsessions. It causes them to > miss information and therefore to fail to comprehend. martinsock misses nothing (especially nothin from the doctors lol) and he understands very well what he's doing here he's just a noisy & persistant troll a troll with a masters degree and a gun LOL!!! Cheers hic >Yup that's been martinsocks MO from the outset - >lie distort and insult >and then twist and dodge when called on it You can't post a lie. You can't post a distortion. Insults? Yes...sometimes those with no character, IMO, deserve to be insulted. Or maybe you would put a flower in Hitler's pistol? Martin Aquinas. martinsock ("I'm not reading all messages") wrote characteristically:- > >Yup that's been martinsocks MO from the outset - > >lie distort and insult > >and then twist and dodge when called on it > You can't post a lie. You can't post a distortion. add 2 to 'about 3,730' about teh twistin & dodgin.. "you agree with me by your omitted words"? lol > Insults? Yes...sometimes "sometimes" martinsock? its u stock in trade! hope u "ran it by three different lawyers" lol > those with no character, IMO, deserve to be insulted. BS > Or maybe you would put a flower in Hitler's pistol? "The question is beneath my dignity to answer" LOL!!! Cheers hic >add 2 to 'about 3,730' How does that break down per capita? I am multiple personality, remember. LOL! Martin John Peter Tina Mary Ike Adam James Thomas Aquinas III martinsock ("Let me restate my position") cuts and runs:- > >add 2 to 'about 3,730' > How does that break down per capita? about 3,730 - no make that 'about 3,750' > I am multiple personality, remember. LOL! add them up & u still dont make a complete human just a mess o psychoses now about teh twistin & dodgin.. "you agree with me by your omitted words"? LOL!!! Cheers hic >add them up & u still dont make a complete human >just a mess o psychoses Yes...yes...I met you in the Hague when you were trying innocents for war crimes. You are so qualified to level charges. Tell me, when you are leader, what channel will I have to tune to nightly? Martin Toffler martinsock ("I am also licensed to carry concealed weapons") has an episode:- > >add them up & u still dont make a complete human > >just a mess o psychoses > Yes...yes...I met you in the Hague when you were trying innocents for > war crimes. i wood remind teh defendant that he must answer teh questions counsel puts 2 him > You are so qualified to level charges. u honor i lay b4 teh court 'about 3,770' messages p0sted 2 a support group by teh defendant > Tell me, when you are leader, what channel will I have to tune to nightly? u will have no need - i shall have u put down now back 2 teh point:- "you agree with me by your omitted words"? LOL!!! Cheers hic >u will have no need - i shall have u put down As I have thought all along. Cheers...bang...hic Martin Eastwood >^The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and >^Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack >^members of the newsgroup. Prove it. You stated it, now prove it. Don't ask me to prove it isn't true. You made the charge. Now defend it. Of course, you can't. >It's worse than that -- "Gym Bob" IS Martin, and I can demonstrate it, >if you wish. Martin puts words into the mouth of his sock puppet, "Gym >Bob," whenever he doesn't want to be directly associated with those >words. Prove it. You stated it, now prove it. Don't ask me to prove it isn't true. You made the charge. Now defend it. Of course, you can't. >^Martin preaches against Nazis and yet works with and >^supports them in this newsgroup. I work with no one. Now, again you leveled a charge. Prove it. You stated it, now prove it. Don't ask me to prove it isn't true. You made the charge. Now defend it. Of course, you can't. >Martin doesn't preach against Nazis at all -- he just uses the word as >an insult against anyone who is to the left of Strom Thurmond or Jesse [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >if you listen to it exclusively, and in a drowsy state, you might >actually wind up believing what you hear. Obviously you can't comprehend my writings if you believe the above. How sad it is that you are stupid. I toss out learning and you raise you hand to go to the bathroom. >^You're a hypocrite, Martin. An empty tinhorn. Your >^hypocracy is always clearly at your side for all >^to see like a big ugly dog. Because you say so? The opinion is hardly coming from a reputable source. >And the big ugly dog is named "Gym Bob" -- the only question is who is >holding the leash. I hold no lease nor am I held by one. Another part of your paranoia reaches USENET. Martin Aquinas ^On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 10:51:33 GMT, Abel Aravidze <abelarav@com.net> ^wrote: ^ ^>^The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and ^>^Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack ^>^members of the newsgroup. ^ ^Prove it. You stated it, now prove it. Don't ask me to prove it isn't ^true. You made the charge. Now defend it. Of course, you can't. The fact that you two work together in your silly little anti-Nagler crusade is obvious from your postings, even if you aren't in communication with each other. And with your schizoid personality, that wouldn't surprise me a bit. ^ ^ ^>It's worse than that -- "Gym Bob" IS Martin, and I can demonstrate it, ^>if you wish. Martin puts words into the mouth of his sock puppet, "Gym ^>Bob," whenever he doesn't want to be directly associated with those ^>words. ^ ^ ^Prove it. You stated it, now prove it. Don't ask me to prove it isn't ^true. You made the charge. Now defend it. Of course, you can't. You really don't want me to do this, do you, Martin -- you know that I can, and that I know exactly where to look. Or is your memory as defective as your logic? ^ ^ ^>^Martin preaches against Nazis and yet works with and ^>^supports them in this newsgroup. ^ ^I work with no one. Now, again you leveled a charge. ^Prove it. You stated it, now prove it. Don't ask me to prove it isn't ^true. You made the charge. Now defend it. Of course, you can't. You are aware of the difference between "working with" and "conspiring with," aren't you? ^>Martin doesn't preach against Nazis at all -- he just uses the word as ^>an insult against anyone who is to the left of Strom Thurmond or Jesse ^>Helms -- when he's not calling everyone a Communist, that is. Words ^>mean nothing to Martin. Reading Martin's writings is like listening to ^>AM talk radio -- you never remember what was said an hour later, but ^>if you listen to it exclusively, and in a drowsy state, you might ^>actually wind up believing what you hear. ^ ^Obviously you can't comprehend my writings if you believe the above. You have called democrats both Nazis and Communists on this newsgroup. Do you deny it? ^How sad it is that you are stupid. I toss out learning and you raise ^you hand to go to the bathroom. That's because the only "learning" you "toss out" belongs in the bathroom. You are a know-nothing blowhard who serves as an AM radio tape recorder. ^ ^>^You're a hypocrite, Martin. An empty tinhorn. Your ^>^hypocracy is always clearly at your side for all ^>^to see like a big ugly dog. ^ ^Because you say so? The opinion is hardly coming from a reputable ^source. ^ ^>And the big ugly dog is named "Gym Bob" -- the only question is who is ^>holding the leash. ^ ^I hold no lease nor am I held by one. Another part of your paranoia ^reaches USENET. You are rather emotional, aren't you? The word I used was "leash," not "lease," you ignoramus. Your so stupid, you can't even figure out what I mean by asking who is holding the leash, so you stupidly assume that I'm implying that someone controls you. I apologize if my use of language was too subtle to fall within your limited command of English. ^ ^Martin Aquinas >You are rather emotional, aren't you? The word I used was "leash," not >"lease," you ignoramus. Oh my...a typo. I apologize. Martin Aquinas >The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and >Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack >members of the newsgroup. Prove it. I do not "embrace" anyone's anti-Semitic comments. Nor is GymBob my "partner." Now, I have not seen you speak out against the ACLU and their many absurd stances. I have not seen you speak out against their support of NAMBLA. Why? Surely NAMBLA is a more dangerous operation than anyone speaking anti-Semitic remarks in America. Why are you silent? Get the point yet? Martin Aquinas > >The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and > >Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack > >members of the newsgroup. > > Prove it. I do not "embrace" anyone's anti-Semitic comments. Nor is > GymBob my "partner." What a load of crap. Prove what? That you have taken up with the anti-Semitic Gym Bob to attack members of the newsgroup? You have no clue as to how obvious you are, do you? OK. Google search 185 hits. Enjoy. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Martin+Gym+Bob+group:alt.support.tinnitus&hl=e n&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=ISO-8859-1&group=alt.support.tinnitus&start=10&sa=N NAMBIA and the ACLU have nothing to do with this newsgroup. You and Gym Bob do. If the ACLU and NAMBIA came onto this newsgroup and began attacking people you'd embrace them as your new best friends. Below are a few from page one of those 185 you and your tag-team man anti-Semitic Gym Bob attacking members of this group. Don't forget to read the other 185. In yours and his own words: From: Gym Bob (NonAtAll@nospam.com) Subject: Re: Gaglker on MEDICAL ETHICS! View: Complete Thread (9 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.support.tinnitus Date: 2003-06-25 07:27:30 PST Yeah but what does it mean? I only copied from a psycho text. "Martin" <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:6j4ifvocq2hr78o3em0a7l3lap93edcmbk@4ax.com... > On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 01:44:46 GMT, "Gym Bob" <NonAtAll@nospam.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Martin Aquinas From: Martin (oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: We can all learn from Martin View: Complete Thread (4 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.support.tinnitus Date: 2003-05-04 20:10:30 PST On Mon, 05 May 2003 00:35:44 GMT, "Gym Bob" <NonAtAll@nospam.com> wrote: >You know what that makes you? If we are voting, I say a shameless advertizer out to make a buck or two. Martin Aquinas From: Gym Bob (NonAtAll@nospam.com) Subject: Re: (O/T) to the OTHER Martin View: Complete Thread (4 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.support.tinnitus Date: 2003-05-27 17:05:43 PST Report him/her like you have done in the past hero! > Martin <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<hfd6dv0r5sliircjfuhebatia97vo8rnaf@4ax.com>... > > I don't care. What, I should care about what some twisted troll-nerd [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > > > Martin Aquinas - From: Gym Bob (NonAtAll@nospam.com) Subject: Re: In My Defense View this article only Newsgroups: alt.support.tinnitus Date: 2003-05-30 08:24:37 PST I have a "Congratulations!" card waiting for his family. "Martin" <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hklddvscb4c6a2a8gubckoes9oujqu2u11@4ax.com... > On Fri, 30 May 2003 02:37:53 GMT, "Capt. Ron Yoli" > <captainron@cfl.rr.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Borders...Language,..Culture...QUICK! From: Martin (oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: In My Defense View this article only Newsgroups: alt.support.tinnitus Date: 2003-05-30 17:22:31 PST On Fri, 30 May 2003 15:36:18 GMT, "Gym Bob" <NonAtAll@nospam.com> wrote: >I have a "Congratulations!" card waiting for his family. LOL! Martin Aquinas - "We cannot forget. We cannot forgive ... We went through too much. They will have a sentence of their own: Remembrance." Liberalism is a philosophy of consolation for the West as it commits suicide Borders...Language,..Culture...QUICK! From: Martin (oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: why? -> mental illness View: Complete Thread (2 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.support.tinnitus Date: 2003-07-24 22:07:56 PST On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 03:10:00 GMT, "Gym Bob" <NonAtAll@nospam.com> wrote: >Martin is a hero. You are too kind. I have filtered the troll that you responded to long ago. It's amazing what vitriol a person can spew. Martin Aquinas - Civilizations are clashing...will you defend your own or doom your children? "We cannot forget. We cannot forgive ... We went through too much. They will have a sentence of their own: Remembrance." Border...Language...Culture....QUICK! From: Gym Bob (NonAtAll@nospam.com) Subject: Re: Lix never existed? View: Complete Thread (5 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: alt.support.tinnitus Date: 2003-06-10 19:47:05 PST So what we are saying is that Lix and Nagler may be the same person? "Martin" <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:el7cevk07seiv6t18i4u9t704n2c76v71b@4ax.com... > On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 03:12:32 GMT, "Gym Bob" <NonAtAll@nospam.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Border...Language...Culture....QUICK! >> >The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and >> >Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Martin+Gym+Bob+group:alt.support.tinnitus&hl=e n&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=ISO-8859-1&group=alt.support.tinnitus&start=10&sa=N You have 62 hits in just one month, ocd_r_us and that is just with this nickname. Not a single one has anything to do with tinnitus support. I don't care how many hits you have, but before you criticize someone else's posting behavior, be sure you can withstand the same kind of scrutiny. It's kind of low because no one ever talks much about you because you are nothing more than a multiple-nick troll, but it is still a good effort. I'll save you the trouble. I have 1870 hits in a year and a half and I don't use any other nicks on usenet. More than a few of those happen to be support posts. Your hero Nagler has 6,960 that he hasn't deleted yet using his nagler nickname. Jim Chinnis trails at 6,230. Murray is the grandaddy of them all with 7,980. Now if you really need something to do, get out your abacus and get to work on how many of those are actual posts, and how many are just the person's name mentioned. Terri http://pub219.ezboard.com/btinnitusactivismandsupport >I'll save you the trouble. I have 1870 hits in a year and a half and I >don't use any other nicks on usenet. .............. You forgot those you post as Kelly under your nospamman27 nick. Terri/llilly/Kelly, get some help. Your psychopathology is consuming you. smn >You forgot those you post as Kelly under your nospamman27 nick. Can you prove that? I say you can't, Ben Janko. Martin Aquinas > >> >The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and > >> >Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > this nickname. Not a single one has anything to do with tinnitus > support. What I do here has everything about tinnitus support in this newsgroup. For me it's not all about Nagler but about your abhorrant behavior. Your occassional supportive post does not justify your ugly saddistic obsessions with attacks against members of this newsgroup. It does not justify your encouragement of Gym Bob the anti-Semitic and Martin who is even more saddistic in his ocd than you are. > I don't care how many hits you have, but before you criticize > someone else's posting behavior, be sure you can withstand the same > kind of scrutiny. 'Sig heil' then, eh Terri-llilly? How abhorrent. Long as it is aimed at your perceived enemies.... > Your hero Nagler has 6,960 that he hasn't > deleted yet using his nagler nickname. Jim Chinnis trails at 6,230. > Murray is the grandaddy of them all with 7,980. Ooops, there you go again, Terri-llilly: I hates them three must attack them must must keep ast focus on attacking them must must Nagler keeps me going on my crusade, not Martin. Why Martin and I have yet to even have sex together. > > >> >The facts are clear. Gym Bob is anti-Semitic and > > >> >Martin continues to embrace him as a partner to attack [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > must > must >Why Martin and I have yet >to even have sex together. That's not my bag, baby. Well, maybe it is? Is it Bob or Bobbie? (g). Uh oh, we just had a communication. We are tag teaming. Ian will rant and rave again! Remember, meet me in IRQ at 12:03:58 precisely, MDT. You say to me "I once hated a man" my reply will be "The cotillion started at Midnight. Why are you late?" We will then pass jokes back and forth about midget lawyers from Harvard. After that we shall share a cup of coffee. The beans must be taken from an 8,000 foot elevation. I will then reveal to you that my name is Bruce and that I own Starbucks. Got it?. Martin Aquinas Martin, wear something sexy like the Red Hot Chili Peppers do..... nothing but a sock on your penis. I have a few contacts in this newsgroup that can obtain any type of sock you could ask for (including luxury imported ones). One retailer is called Soxs-R-Us. They offer no tax and free shipping! Why Martin and I have yet to even have sex together. That's not my bag, baby. Well, maybe it is? Is it Bob or Bobbie? (g). Martin Aquinas "Robert" wrote excitedly:- > Martin, wear something sexy like the Red Hot Chili Peppers do..... > nothing but a sock on your penis. the mind reels! rather a sock in his mouth than on his shortcoming LOL!!! Cheers hic Nineteen ninety five? Is that for a pair of sox or just one? Can I buy a gross? LOL!!! Cheers hic "Robert" wrote barely:- > Nineteen ninety five? Is that for a pair of sox or just one? they always come in pairs its traditional teh customer is o course free 2 wear 1 - or none > Can I buy a gross? sure martinsock has a gross > LOL!!! > Cheers hic "That was pretty lame of you" LOL!!! Cheers hic I love when you talk dirty! > >Why Martin and I have yet > >to even have sex together. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Martin Aquinas >I love when you talk dirty! Apparently others are turned on too! :) Martin Chili Pepper "Martin" <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com wrote amorously: I love when you talk dirty! > Apparently others are turned on too! :) > Martin Chili Pepper I had to give my socks a cold shower!! LOL!!! Cheers hic > >Why Martin and I have yet > >to even have sex together. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Martin Aquinas The fact is you encourage, support and attack with someone whom you know is anti-Semitic and who makes anti-Jewish remarks on this newsgroup. That in itself, Martin, is an anti-Semitic act on your part. Not only do you do it openly, but according to this post of yours, you are bragging about it. Even if he did, what's the problem? It has been internationally accepted for milleniums. > > >Why Martin and I have yet > > >to even have sex together. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Not only do you do it openly, but according to this post of yours, you > are bragging about it. > Even if he did, what's the problem? It has been internationally accepted for > milleniums. That had me completely baffled..... sort of the same while hearing the OJ criminal trial verdict. Now you have to make up your miind (both cells). You can't have it both ways young man. First we are all told Martin and I are the same person and now you announce to the world we support each other. You are a little confused and have no point except the one about your own ignorance. > > >Why Martin and I have yet > > >to even have sex together. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Not only do you do it openly, but according to this post of yours, you > are bragging about it. >First we are all told Martin and I are the same person and now you announce >to the world we support each other. Try to sing this like Eric Idle I like myself I think I'm grand I go to the movies and I hold my hand I put my arms Around my waist And when I get fresh I slap my face Martin Palin >That in itself, Martin, is an anti-Semitic act on your part. >Not only do you do it openly, but according to this post of yours, you >are bragging about it. Do you ever pick up the NY Times? Ever watch CBS, NBC, ABC? You, Ian, by your logic are encouraging them all for their elitist and anti-American conduct. You are an enabler to them. Now, take a look at both paragraphs above. Both are really, really stupid comments to make. They lack reasoning. Now, have you written the ACLU about their position with defending NAMBLA? If not, why do you support them in your silence? Catching on yet? Martin "They call me Mr. Vegas" Aquinas - who is smarter than Ian but he is so stupid he doesn't know it. From: Martin <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: alt.support.tinnitus >> The fact is you encourage, support and attack with someone whom >> you know is anti-Semitic and who makes anti-Jewish remarks on this >> newsgroup. That in itself, Martin, is an anti-Semitic act on your part. >> Not only do you do it openly, but according to this post of yours, you >> are bragging about it. >Do you ever pick up the NY Times? Ever watch CBS, NBC, ABC? You, Ian, >by your logic are encouraging them all for their elitist and >anti-American conduct. You are an enabler to them. Wrong. They are not present in this newsgroup. Both you and Gym Bob are. >Now, have you written the ACLU about their position with defending >NAMBLA? If not, why do you support them in your silence? >Catching on yet? So that's it? Your justification for your anti-Semitic acts in ast? If NAMBLA or the ACLU were here in ast attacking people then it would be issue. They are not here but you two, who commit anti-Semitic acts, are. Catching on yet?? Get it yet Martin?? Suddenly Israel and the Jewish aren't worth it for you anymore? Sig heil, Martin?? >Your justification for your anti-Semitic acts in ast? You are going to keep making an a.s of yourself. Go right ahead and post a single anti-Semitic remark that I have made. Just one. >If NAMBLA or the ACLU were here in ast attacking people then it would be issue. It is as relevant as your charge because your charge is false. >They are not here but you two, who commit anti-Semitic acts, are. Sorry, but I do not commit to anti-Semitic remarks. You keep claiming that I do, that's for sure. >Catching on yet?? >Get it yet Martin?? >Suddenly Israel and the Jewish aren't worth it for you anymore? Please have a sanity check. You must have me confused with another. >Sig heil, Martin?? Mozeltoff, and good night. Work on your propaganda some more, Herr Goebbels. Didn't they hang you with your Nazi slime friends at Nuremberg? Martin Aquinas > Go right ahead and post a single anti-Semitic remark that I have made. > Just one. Go ahead a post a single post of mine where I said you, Martin, made "anti-Semitic remarks". Just one. Now I've said it many times about your man Gym Bob. > >If NAMBLA or the ACLU were here in ast attacking people then it would be issue. > > It is as relevant as your charge because your charge is false. Really? What is my charge? > >They are not here but you two, who commit anti-Semitic acts, are. > > Sorry, but I do not commit to anti-Semitic remarks. You keep claiming > that I do, that's for sure. "Acts", Martin, not "remarks". "Acts". Again, I have not claimed that you, Martin, made anti-Semitic remarks. Prove that I did. The operative term is "acts". Here is what I said again: "The fact is you encourage, support and attack with someone whom you know is anti-Semitic and who makes anti-Jewish remarks on this newsgroup. That in itself, Martin, is an anti-Semitic act on your part. Not only do you do it openly, but according to this post of yours, you are bragging about it." > >Catching on yet?? > >Get it yet Martin?? > >Suddenly Israel and the Jewish aren't worth it for you anymore? > > Please have a sanity check. You must have me confused with another. Hardly. Hey Martin, does your tagteam buddy Gym Bob make anti-Semitic remarks? > >Sig heil, Martin?? ^Martin <oh_brother_where_art_thou@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<sae2nv0b9ugjst6cmocqg5e04mq0b827ie@4ax.com>... ^> ^> Go right ahead and post a single anti-Semitic remark that I have made. ^> Just one. ^> ^ ^Go ahead a post a single post of mine where I said you, Martin, made ^"anti-Semitic remarks". Just one. ^Now I've said it many times about your man Gym Bob. The source of Martin's confusion is that he can't remember which identity he is defending, "Martin" or "Gym Bob." He keeps forgetting who he is trying to be. ^ ^ ^ ^> >If NAMBLA or the ACLU were here in ast attacking people then it would be issue. ^> ^> It is as relevant as your charge because your charge is false. ^> ^ ^Really? What is my charge? ^ ^ ^ ^> >They are not here but you two, who commit anti-Semitic acts, are. ^> ^> Sorry, but I do not commit to anti-Semitic remarks. You keep claiming ^> that I do, that's for sure. ^> ^ ^"Acts", Martin, not "remarks". "Acts". ^Again, I have not claimed that you, Martin, made anti-Semitic remarks. ^Prove that I did. The operative term is "acts". Here is what I said again: ^"The fact is you encourage, support and attack with someone whom ^you know is anti-Semitic and who makes anti-Jewish remarks on this ^newsgroup. That in itself, Martin, is an anti-Semitic act on your part. ^Not only do you do it openly, but according to this post of yours, you ^are bragging about it." ^ ^> >Catching on yet?? ^> >Get it yet Martin?? ^> >Suddenly Israel and the Jewish aren't worth it for you anymore? ^> ^> Please have a sanity check. You must have me confused with another. ^> ^ ^Hardly. ^Hey Martin, does your tagteam buddy Gym Bob make anti-Semitic remarks? ^ ^> >Sig heil, Martin?? ^> >^"The fact is you encourage, support and attack with someone whom >^you know is anti-Semitic and who makes anti-Jewish remarks on this >^newsgroup. That in itself, Martin, is an anti-Semitic act on your part. >^Not only do you do it openly, but according to this post of yours, you >^are bragging about it." How could you be so disgusting then? I have seen the term NAMBLA used here and you have never said a word. That [by your reasoning] is a NAMBLA "act" and you are guilty as charged. Clear yet? Martin Aquinas > >^"The fact is you encourage, support and attack with someone whom > >^you know is anti-Semitic and who makes anti-Jewish remarks on this [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Martin Aquinas No. That has nothing to do with his or my reasoning. What does that have to do with aiding and abetting someone who makes ant-Semitic posts as you are doing? Even this whole NAMBLA argument you're using is nothing more than you trying to make excuses to continue that aiding and abetting. And a smoke screen. That is, by definition, in itself another anti-Semitic act. You see, he nor anyone else here is coddling NAMBLA supporters as you do with Gym Bob and anti-Semitism. By the way, you still haven't answered my question that I asked at the begining of this thread that you started, which is: "Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of your troll tagteam?" Why do you keep saying there is something wrong with semites? > > >^"The fact is you encourage, support and attack with someone whom > > >^you know is anti-Semitic and who makes anti-Jewish remarks on this [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > "Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of > your troll tagteam?" >Why do you keep saying there is something wrong with semites? ................. Why do you keep saying? smn >Why do you keep saying? > >smn Why do you exist? Is it so that people may say "There but for the grace of God go I"? Martin - the resident philosopher >Why do you keep saying there is something wrong with semites? My money is on because he's an idiot. Martin the Greek >You see, he nor anyone else here is coddling NAMBLA supporters >as you do with Gym Bob and anti-Semitism. Your charge is false. I am not in the business of engaging in Thesis, Anti, Synthesis. If you want answers try leveling charges with facts and truth to them and not your twisted assertions likely done while smoking dope. >By the way, you still haven't answered my question that I asked >at the begining of this thread that you started, which is: >"Is it that you love "Nazi goons" when they're a member of >your troll tagteam?" See above. Martin Aquinas |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message