Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Tinnitus / October 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FLUNARIZINE HYDROCHLORIDE

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 01 Oct 2007 14:46 GMT
Anyone who is having trouble in sleep can talk to your doctor about
this one.  I was given this medicine by my ENT doctor when I felt
every night that someone was blowing a whistle at the middle of my
brain after mid-night.

As far as my experience is concerned, this med is non-additive and can
be bought OTC.
BaldBastardBuster@hotmail.com - 02 Oct 2007 02:40 GMT
On Oct 1, 7:46 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone who is having trouble in sleep can talk to your doctor about
> this one.  I was given this medicine by my ENT doctor when I felt
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> As far as my experience is concerned, this med is non-additive and can
> be bought OTC.

This drug is a calcium channel blocker indicated for heart disease or
high blood pressure and is NOT available over the counter in the US,
Canada, or Europe.

It also has serious side effects.

More misinformation from the self-appointed tinnitus expert.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 02 Oct 2007 03:36 GMT
On 10 2 ,   9 40 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Oct 1, 7:46 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> More misinformation from the self-appointed tinnitus expert.

The "misinformation" was given to me by my ENT doctor.  And thus
anyone who considers using this med should consult with his doctor
first.  It was a suggestion and was explained very clearly in my post,
unless, of course, you are operating on an assumption that any piece
of information that is not 'mis' means the patient can simply buy and
put it into his mouth.
BaldBastardBuster@hotmail.com - 02 Oct 2007 05:27 GMT
On Oct 1, 8:36 pm, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 2 ,   9 40 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> of information that is not 'mis' means the patient can simply buy and
> put it into his mouth.

Yeah.  Sure. Right.

More baloney.

Please stick your head in a vise.  Apply 500 lbs of pressure.  You
will experience immediate relief.

And so will we.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 02 Oct 2007 11:42 GMT
On 10 2 ,   12 27 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Oct 1, 8:36 pm, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> -         -

You go ahead first.  If it feels good, tell me and I will second it.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 02 Oct 2007 12:04 GMT
On 10 2 ,   12 27 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Oct 1, 8:36 pm, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> And so will we.-         -

You see, this is another piece of "islander mentality".  Have you done
a survey on this "we"?  You are trying to advance an argument by using
the majority rule tactic to coerce your opponent into submission by
suggesting that *we* are on your side and the *we* have to be right.

You are not an American.  Are you?

> -         -
BaldBastardBuster@hotmail.com - 02 Oct 2007 13:48 GMT
On Oct 2, 5:04 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 2 ,   12 27 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
>
> > -         -

You really should go away.  Maybe all that Ginko has opened a leak in
your cerebral cortex.  No, actually, I doubt you have one.  So its OK
to keep taking the Ginko.  For you.

Please don't advise people to take heart medications for tinnitus.
And don't tell folks that these prescription meds are available OTC
when they are not.

And don't point to old studies involving less than 100 patients that
purport to show that Ginko helps tinnitus.

And stop pushing the antihistimine serc as a cure.  It isn't.  Neither
is accupuncture.

The best treatment for tinnitus is to get it checked out to make sure
there is no underlying medical cause.  And then just accept it and
live your life. Over time, it recedes into the background.  Pursuing
fruitless "cures" just keeps your attention focused on it.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 02 Oct 2007 16:09 GMT
On 10 2 ,   8 48 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Oct 2, 5:04 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> your cerebral cortex.  No, actually, I doubt you have one.  So its OK
> to keep taking the Ginko.  For you.

So you are talking to someone without a cerebral cortex.  You have to
be someone like him in order to communicate with him.

> Please don't advise people to take heart medications for tinnitus.
> And don't tell folks that these prescription meds are available OTC
> when they are not.

Whatever medications I am  suggesting to people were prescribed to me
by certified doctors.  They are available OTC where I am living.  Do
you think the whole world is like the Manhatten Island in every
conceivable way?

> And don't point to old studies involving less than 100 patients that
> purport to show that Ginko helps tinnitus.

You seem to have missed the most important in the German experiment.
It is not the number of people in the sample, but the way by which
ginko is taken into the body that matters the most.  Read again.  It
is simple English.

> And stop pushing the antihistimine serc as a cure.

Which one?  Betahistine?  Who says it is a cure, islander?

 It isn't.  Neither
> is accupuncture.

It did it for me.

> The best treatment for tinnitus is to get it checked out to make sure
> there is no underlying medical cause.

No examination anywhere in the whole world can 'make sure' there is no
underlying medical cause.  This assumption is wrong...

 And then just accept it and
> live your life. Over time, it recedes into the background.  Pursuing
> fruitless "cures" just keeps your attention focused on it.

Since the assumption above is wrong, the conclusion that follows that
assumption would collapse under the golden gate bridge in SF.

Try again...

-         -

> -         -
BaldBastardBuster@hotmail.com - 03 Oct 2007 02:24 GMT
On Oct 2, 9:09 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 2 ,   8 48 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
> No examination anywhere in the whole world can 'make sure' there is no
> underlying medical cause.  This assumption is wrong...

Don't think so.  Acoustic neuromas, auto-immune problems, high blood
pressure, vitamin deficiencies, thyroid insufficiency, and even earwax
pressing against the eardrum can all cause tinnitus.  And these
conditions are all treatable.  But you need an examination by an ear
specialist, as well as the appropriate test, to rule them out.  It
would be a shame indeed if someone listens to you about gobbling down
GB pills and misses out on an easy cure.
Janice - 03 Oct 2007 02:35 GMT
If they had an easy cure they wouldn't be here asking, would they?

Comprehension problems?

> Don't think so.  Acoustic neuromas, auto-immune problems, high blood
> pressure, vitamin deficiencies, thyroid insufficiency, and even
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> down
> GB pills and misses out on an easy cure.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 03 Oct 2007 02:50 GMT
On 10 3 ,   9 24 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Oct 2, 9:09 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 92 lines]
> pressure, vitamin deficiencies, thyroid insufficiency, and even earwax
> pressing against the eardrum can all cause tinnitus.

...and there are others too, such as a pinched nerve in my personal
case.  So your definition of a "thorough" examination still
collapses...

 And these
> conditions are all treatable.  But you need an examination by an ear
> specialist, as well as the appropriate test, to rule them out.  It
> would be a shame indeed if someone listens to you about gobbling down
> GB pills and misses out on an easy cure.-         -

It is one of the things to try but there are others.  Have I ruled out
going to see an experienced ENT doctor like Murrary in any of my post?

> -         -
BaldBastardBuster@hotmail.com - 03 Oct 2007 03:56 GMT
On Oct 2, 7:50 pm, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 3 ,   9 24 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 110 lines]
>
> > -         -

You sure did.  You advised sufferers to wait two weeks and take
Ginko.  And then in another post you contradict yourself by recounting
about how Chinese doctors rush to immediately treat tinnitus with ear
infusions.  They do that in Europe, too. In the USA, they sometimes do
it, too, but use steroids.  It all depends on the examination.  Which
is why it is important to get one as soon as possible. Got it, now?
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 03 Oct 2007 09:24 GMT
On 10 3 ,   10 56 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Oct 2, 7:50 pm, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 115 lines]
> You sure did.  You advised sufferers to wait two weeks and take
> Ginko.

What makes you think that taking ginko is not an immediate treatment?
Ginko thins the blood in the head and helps circulation.  Of course,
if they could get intravenous infusion, it is even better.

 And then in another post you contradict yourself by recounting
> about how Chinese doctors rush to immediately treat tinnitus with ear
> infusions.

Not ear infusions!  Intravenous injection is done onto the arms and is
not necessarily meant specifically for the ear.

 They do that in Europe, too. In the USA, they sometimes do
> it, too, but use steroids.  It all depends on the examination.  Which
> is why it is important to get one as soon as possible. Got it, now?-         -

An examination is important, of course.  Ginko helps keeping the T
fresh, until something better comes on board.  This scenario applies
for many patients' cases.

I rushed to have a check-up as soon as I heard T.  One doctor, after
giving me an expensive scan operation, sent me away with a bottle of
vitamin B.  Another, also after an expensive test, sent me away with a
bottle of med used to pump blood into the inner ear.  I forgot the
name.  None of that was useful.  And in my experience GB was better
than both of them.  Thus you cannot make a statement that taking GB
does not represent immediate treatment.

Get it???
> -         -
DeltaSwinger@hotmail.com - 09 Oct 2007 01:29 GMT
On Oct 3, 2:24 am, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10 3 ,   10 56 , BaldBastardBus...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 148 lines]
>
> > -         -

I thought you went to see "almost 15" doctors.  Did any of them rule
out an acoustic neuroma?  I'd be concerned if I were you and did not
get a test for that.  It is a benign tumor, yes.  But it can literally
destroy your brain.  I would say, judging from the quality of your
posts, that indeed may be going on.  I'd get that checked out pronto
if I were you.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.