 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Tinnitus / August 2007How is the research on tinnitus ?
Does research progress ??? > Does research progress ??? You have raised a very interesting issue, from both a practical and an academic point of view. Research does lead to improvement when it is conducted by high quality intellectgentsia. On the other hand, when research is done by quasi- scientists or third-grade hillbilly intellectual 'laborers', the research so accomplished can even throw back progress. So my advice to you is to follow the research findings done by the first- grade intellectgentsia. Of course it is up to you to distinguish between the smart and the less smart. On Aug 11, 5:09 pm, "fyfp...@gmail.com" <fyfp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does research progress ??? > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > first- grade intellectgentsia. Of course it is up to you to > distinguish between the smart and the less smart. Well that explains it. > > Does research progress ??? > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > first- grade intellectgentsia. Of course it is up to you to > distinguish between the smart and the less smart. My advice is to ignore the mindless, nonsensical drivel spewed by this arrogant a.shole and use your common sense. Once a fundamental discovery is made, it will soon be recognized by the scientific community, and nobody will give a rat's a.s whether the discovery was made by a so-called "first-grade, high quality intellectgentsia" or by a so-called "third-grade hillbilly intellectual laborer. Il mittente di questo messaggio |The sender address of this non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio |person but to a fake address of an di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it Since "1984" G.O. hasn't put out anything intelligent. >> > Does research progress ??? >> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > Per maggiori informazioni |For more info > https://www.mixmaster.it > Since "1984" G.O. hasn't put out anything intelligent. Based on your posts to this newsgroup, it would appear that you have never put out anything intelligent. > In article <1186848557.719391.184...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > My advice is to ignore the mindless, nonsensical drivel spewed by this arrogant a.shole and use your common sense. Once a fundamental discovery is made, it will soon be recognized by the scientific community, and nobody will give a rat's a.s whether the discovery was made by a so-called "first-grade, high quality intellectgentsia" or by a so-called "third-grade hillbilly intellectual laborer. **If the scientific community recognizes a fundamental discovery, it simply implies this discovery was made by the first-grade intellectgensia and not by some hillbilly intellectual laborers. "First-grade intellectgensia" does not necessarily have to come from places like Harvard or Yale, it can come from a community college in Alabama. I am sorry that English is not your first language... , > Il mittente di questo messaggio |The sender address of this > non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > - - > > In article <1186848557.719391.184...@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> > > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > I am sorry that English is not your first language... Nonsense. Recognition of a fundamental discovery by the scientific communmity implies nothing about the discoverer's intelligence. The discovery could have been simply accidental or the result of a brute force effort aimed at investigating all possible alternatives. You are much like the third-grade hillbilly intellectual laborer and the monkey at a typewriter. Depending on chance, you may eventually say something that is sensible. In the mean time, perhaps you should take refresher courses in both English and logic. > In article <1186987203.394505.148...@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com> > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > Nonsense. Recognition of a fundamental discovery by the scientific > communmity implies nothing about the discoverer's intelligence. Then whatever intelligence that discovers it is good or 'first grade intelligence, at least from my point of view, unless you can define what good intelligence means and have me agree to that defintion of yours. The > discovery could have been simply accidental or the result of a brute > force effort aimed at investigating all possible alternatives. That is still good or first-grade intelligence. Milton discovered the law of gravity when an apply fell on his head while someone with less intelligence might have ignored it completely. Does "a brute force effort" necessarily mean it is less than first-grade intelligence at all? > You are much like the third-grade hillbilly intellectual laborer > and the monkey at a typewriter. Wait until you are capable of countering what I said above before you attempt to advance your argument using personal attacks. Can i say you are much like a dog or pig at a typewriter? What does it suggest to you. Depending on chance, you may > eventually say something that is sensible. Are you the judge? How does a dog or a pig at a typewriter judge anything in the absence of a human criteria? In the mean time, > perhaps you should take refresher courses in both English and > logic. For what? To be as illogical as you are? A course that refreshes is a refreshing course. Right? - - > - - > > In article <1186987203.394505.148...@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com> > > [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > For what? To be as illogical as you are? A course that refreshes is > a refreshing course. Right? Based on your idiotic comments and your obvious irationality, it would appear that your tinnitus is accompanied by severe mental retardation as well as by numerous psychoses. Obviously, tinnitus is the least of your problematic afflictions. Based on your comments I would say about 15 years old and a huge coward. > Based on your idiotic comments and your obvious irationality, it > would appear that your tinnitus is accompanied by severe mental > retardation as well as by numerous psychoses. Obviously, tinnitus > is the least of your problematic afflictions. > Based on your comments I would say about 15 years old and a huge > coward. Based on your posts I would say that you are a mental retard. Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it > In article <SdydnezOs4yNy1_bnZ2dnUVZ_gedn...@golden.net> > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Per maggiori informazioni |For more info > https://www.mixmaster.it what a miserable thread > In article <1187086460.369716.40...@m37g2000prh.googlegroups.com> > [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > > - - Based upon your being able to understand what I wrote and that you called me a "monkey at a typewriter", it would suggest that you are a monkey too. Only monkeys are able to understand each other. Am I correct, monkey? > Based upon your being able to understand what I wrote and that you > called me a "monkey at a typewriter", it would suggest that you are a > monkey too. Only monkeys are able to understand each other. > > Am I correct, monkey? Impressive!!
|
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.