On 5/16/07 6:48 AM, in article
1179323290.120904.298740@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com, "bigvince"
<Vince.Miraglia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Does anyone know a treatment to clear eustachian tubes which is
>> suitable for someone with high blood pressure? My doctor seems to have
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> blockage. Is it the cause of the noises in your ear . Are you on meds
> ect. Find a very good Doctor. They are not interchangable.
Simple eustachian tube blockage may respond to nose drops - vasoconstrictors
that you apply to the nose and then drop the head with the ear down so that
the drops trickle towards the ear.
My product Clear.ease (www.hydromedonline.com) is a combo of papaya and
pineapple enzymes to open the eustachian tube. Take one 3x a day, dissolve
in mouth between cheek and gums.
Hot tea, lemon and honey can also help.
Susan please note:
I do make a PROFIT on Clear.ease
I do profit on the suffering of sick people
But since I designed this for eustachian blockage should I then NOT tell
about it?
Janice - 17 May 2007 04:37 GMT
You must be kidding!
Definitely changes a few things for me. Only in the US.
> On 5/16/07 6:48 AM, in article
> 1179323290.120904.298740@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com, "bigvince"
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> tell
> about it?
Susan - 17 May 2007 14:23 GMT
x-no-archie: yes
> Simple eustachian tube blockage may respond to nose drops - vasoconstrictors
> that you apply to the nose and then drop the head with the ear down so that
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> But since I designed this for eustachian blockage should I then NOT tell
> about it?
I think if you disclose your financial interest, then folks can make an
informed choice, at least.
You might also discuss the fact that other, cheaper forms of
proteolytics are found to have anti inflammtory effects, and that there
is no evidence of demonstrated superiority of your far pricier formulation.
Susan
Murray Grossan - 18 May 2007 03:26 GMT
On 5/17/07 6:23 AM, in article 5b33aaF2qdrbmU1@mid.individual.net, "Susan"
<nevermind@nomail.com> wrote:
> You might also discuss the fact that other, cheaper forms of
> proteolytics are found to have anti inflammtory effects, and that there
> is no evidence of demonstrated superiority of your far pricier formulation.
For the benefit of the readers, kindly list these. I personally don't know
of any other buccal lozenge with calibrated enzyme units. Remember oral
enzymes that you swallow are for digestion and are inactivated by stomach
acids. The buccal tablet is absorbed via buccal pouch so it by passes the
stomach.
Susan - 18 May 2007 12:46 GMT
> For the benefit of the readers, kindly list these. I personally don't know
> of any other buccal lozenge with calibrated enzyme units. Remember oral
> enzymes that you swallow are for digestion and are inactivated by stomach
> acids. The buccal tablet is absorbed via buccal pouch so it by passes the
> stomach.
Studies that specifically prove that this is a more cost effective and
clinically effective delivery?
Susan
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 17 May 2007 16:16 GMT
> On 5/16/07 6:48 AM, in article
> 1179323290.120904.298...@w5g2000hsg.googlegroups.com, "bigvince"
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> But since I designed this for eustachian blockage should I then NOT tell
> about it?
I would not listen to advice that does not bring a profit to the
inventor. Since your product is bringing you a profit, I DO listen ....