> Yet we seem to have your full attention. Why do you suppose that is?
><terri231@knowspam.mam> wrote in message news
>> Yet we seem to have your full attention. Why do you suppose that is?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Shug
Was I talking to you?
Terri
http://pub219.ezboard.com/btinnitusactivismandsupport
Ian Cessant - 18 Sep 2003 17:02 GMT
> ><terri231@knowspam.mam> wrote in message news
> >> Yet we seem to have your full attention. Why do you suppose that is?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Terri
> http://pub219.ezboard.com/btinnitusactivismandsupport
See what I mean, Shug? It's just OCD reflex.
Scatchin' an itch. No real substance.
Paul - 18 Sep 2003 20:27 GMT
> ><terri231@knowspam.mam> wrote in message news
> >> Yet we seem to have your full attention. Why do you suppose that is?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Terri
> http://pub219.ezboard.com/btinnitusactivismandsupport
Now Terri, after many posts to Murray outlining the
difference
between posts and emails, I thought you'd understand the
difference. When you post on usenet you talk to everyone
that reads the group though you may be addressing a
particular
individual. That's why people that read the group know
what
you're all about, even though, as you say, you weren't
"talking
to" them.
Paul
shug - 19 Sep 2003 15:22 GMT
> ><terri231@knowspam.mam> wrote in message news
> >> Yet we seem to have your full attention. Why do you suppose that is?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Terri
> http://pub219.ezboard.com/btinnitusactivismandsupport
What a prat you are? You replied to MY post, so one would assume you were
talking to me, yes! Christ almighty! <sigh>
shug